The objective of the study was to produce three-dimensional and porous nanofiber reinforced hydrogel scaffolds that can mimic the hydrated composite structure of the cartilage extracellular matrix. In this regard, wet-electrospun poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) nanofiber reinforced carboxymethyl chitosan-silk fibroin (PNFs/CMCht-SF) hydrogel composite scaffolds that were chemically cross-linked by poly(ethylene glycol) diglycidyl ether (PEGDE) were produced. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in cartilage regeneration where a three dimensional porous spongy composite scaffold was obtained by the dispersion of wet-electrospun nanofibers within a polymer matrix. All of the produced hydrogel composite scaffolds had an interconnected microporous structure with well-integrated PHBV nanofibers on the pore walls. The scaffold comprising an equal amount of PEGDE and polymer (PNFs/CMCht-SF1:PEGDE1) demonstrated comparable water content (91.4 ± 0.7%), tan δ (0.183 at 1 Hz) and compressive strength (457 ± 85 kPa) values to that of articular cartilage. Besides, based on the histological analysis, this hydrogel composite scaffold supported the chondrogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Consequently, this hydrogel composite scaffold presented a great promise for cartilage tissue regeneration.
ArmientoAStoddartMAliniM, et al.
Biomaterials for articular cartilage tissue engineering: learning from biology. Acta Biomater2018;
65: 1–20.
2.
AhmadiFGitiRMohammadi-SamaniS, et al.
Biodegradable scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Galen Med J2017;
6: 70–80.
3.
EslahiNSimchiAMehrjooM, et al.
Hybrid cross-linked hydrogels based on fibrous protein/block copolymers and layered silicate nanoparticles: tunable thermosensitivity, biodegradability and mechanical durability. RSC Adv2016;
6: 62944–62957.
4.
CoburnJMGibsonMMonagleS, et al.
Bioinspired nanofibers support chondrogenesis for articular cartilage repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2012;
109: 10012–10017.
5.
SeolYJParkJYJeongWKimTH, et al.
Development of hybrid scaffolds using ceramic and hydrogel for articular cartilage tissue regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res A2015;
103: 1404–1413.
6.
IwasakiNKasaharaYYamaneS, et al.
Chitosan-based hyaluronic acid hybrid polymer fibers as a scaffold biomaterial for cartilage tissue engineering. Polymers2010;
3: 100–113.
7.
HolzwarthJMMaPX.Biomimetic nanofibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials2011;
32: 9622–9629.
8.
LiWJLaurencinCTCatersonEJ, et al.
Electrospun nanofibrous structure: a novel scaffold for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res2002;
60: 613–621.
9.
YodmuangSMcNamaraSLNoverAB, et al.
Silk microfiber-reinforced silk hydrogel composites for functional cartilage tissue repair. Acta Biomater2015;
11: 27–36.
10.
VaraprasadKRaghavendraGMJayaramuduT, et al.
A mini review on hydrogels classification and recent developments in miscellaneous applications. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2017;
79: 958–971.
11.
DimidaSBarcaACancelliN, et al.
Effects of genipin concentration on cross-linked chitosan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: structural characterization and evidence of biocompatibility features. Int J Polym Sci2017;
2017: 1–8.
12.
YangJZhangYSYueK, et al.
Cell-laden hydrogels for osteochondral and cartilage tissue engineering. Acta Biomater2017;
57: 1–25.
13.
CaoYDingYZhangL, et al.
Preparation of surface-modified, micrometer-sized carboxymethyl chitosan drug‐loaded microspheres. J Appl Polym Sci2018;
135: 45731.
14.
GonçalvesRCda SilvaDPSigniniR, et al.
Inhibition of bacterial biofilms by carboxymethyl chitosan combined with silver, zinc and copper salts. Int J Biol Macromol2017;
105: 385–392.
15.
VepariCKaplanDL.Silk as a biomaterial. Prog Polym Sci2007;
32: 991–1007.
16.
KunduBRajkhowaRKunduSC, et al.
Silk fibroin biomaterials for tissue regenerations. Adv Drug Deliv Rev2013;
65: 457–470.
17.
MirahmadiFTafazzoli-ShadpourMShokrgozarMA, et al.
Enhanced mechanical properties of thermosensitive chitosan hydrogel by silk fibers for cartilage tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2013;
33: 4786–4794.
BasODe-Juan-PardoEMMeinertC, et al.
Biofabricated soft network composites for cartilage tissue engineering. Biofabrication2017;
9: 025014.
20.
Colpankan GunesOUnalanICecenB, et al.
Three-dimensional silk impregnated HAp/PHBV nanofibrous scaffolds for bone regeneration. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater2019;
68: 217–228.
21.
Gámiz-GonzálezMAEdlundUVidaurreA, et al.
Synthesis of highly swellable hydrogels of water-soluble Carboxymethyl chitosan and poly(ethylene glycol). Polym Int2017;
66: 1624–1632.
22.
WeigelTSchinkelGLendleinA.Design and preparation of polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering. Expert Rev Med Devices2006;
3: 835–851.
23.
RaghunathJRolloJSalesKM, et al.
Biomaterials and scaffold design: key to tissue-engineering cartilage. Biotechnol Appl Biochem2007;
46: 73–84.
24.
YanJMiaoYTanH, et al.
Injectable alginate/hydroxyapatite gel scaffold combined with gelatin microspheres for drug delivery and bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2016;
63: 274–284.
25.
XuHCaiSXuL, et al.
Water-stable three-dimensional ultrafine fibrous scaffolds from keratin for cartilage tissue engineering. Langmuir2014;
30: 8461–8470.
26.
ChenYWangHYuJ, et al.
Mechanically strong and pH-responsive carboxymethyl chitosan/graphene oxide/polyacrylamide nanocomposite hydrogels with fast recoverability. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed2017;
28: 1899–1917.
27.
ChenZCaoSWangH, et al.
Biomimetic remineralization of demineralized dentine using scaffold of CMC/ACP nanocomplexes in an in vitro tooth model of deep caries. PloS One2015;
10: e0116553.
28.
Kumar Singh YadavHShivakumarH.In vitro and in vivo evaluation of pH-sensitive hydrogels of carboxymethyl chitosan for intestinal delivery of theophylline. ISRN Pharm2012;
2012: 763127.
29.
AchiliasDSKarabelaMMVarkopoulouEA, et al.
Cure kinetics study of two epoxy systems with Fourier tranform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). J Macromol Sci A2012;
49: 630–638.
30.
PradhanSPandeyPMohantyS, et al.
Synthesis and characterization of waterborne epoxy derived from epoxidized soybean oil and bioderived C-36 dicarboxylic acid. J Coat Technol Res2017;
14: 915–926.
31.
FouchalFKnightJDickensPM.Monitoring the polymerization of a diglycidyl ether bisphenol-A/2, 2′-dimethyl-4, 4′-methylenebis (cyclohexylamine) matrix with a Fourier transform infrared optical fibre sensor. Proc IMechE, Part L: Design and Applications2004;
218: 331–342.
32.
GonzálezMGCabanelasJCBaselgaJ. Applications of FTIR on epoxy resins-identification, monitoring the curing process, phase separation and water uptake. In: Theophanides T (eds) Infrared spectroscopy – materials science, engineering and technology. London, UK: InTech, 2012, pp. 261–284.
33.
LiCVepariCJinH-J, et al.
Electrospun silk-BMP-2 scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials2006;
27: 3115–3124.
34.
UnalanIColpankanOAlbayrakAZ, et al.
Biocompatibility of plasma-treated poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) nanofiber mats modified by silk fibroin for bone tissue regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2016;
68: 842–850.
35.
Oliveira BarudHGBarudHdSCavicchioliM, et al.
Preparation and characterization of a bacterial cellulose/silk fibroin sponge scaffold for tissue regeneration. Carbohydr Polym2015;
128: 41–51.
36.
Sophia FoxAJBediARodeoSA.The basic science of articular cartilage: structure, composition, and function. Sports Health2009;
1: 461–468.
37.
LeeC-TKungP-HLeeY-D.Preparation of poly (vinyl alcohol)-chondroitin sulfate hydrogel as matrices in tissue engineering. Carbohydr Polym2005;
61: 348–354.
38.
ChenKZhangDYangX, et al.
Research on viscoelastic behavior and mechanism of hydrogel grafted with UHMWPE. Soft Mater2016;
14: 244–252.
39.
YangZWuYLiC, et al.
Improved mesenchymal stem cells attachment and in vitro cartilage tissue formation on chitosan-modified poly(L-lactide-co-epsilon-caprolactone) scaffold. Tissue Eng Part A2012;
18: 242–251.
LawlessBMSadeghiHTempleDK, et al.
Viscoelasticity of articular cartilage: analysing the effect of induced stress and the restraint of bone in a dynamic environment. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2017;
75: 293–301.
42.
YanLPWangYJRenL, et al.
Genipin-cross-linked collagen/chitosan biomimetic scaffolds for articular cartilage tissue engineering applications. J Biomed Mater Res A2010;
95: 465–475.
43.
PlacetVFoltêteE.Is dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) a non-resonance technique? EPJ Web Conf EDP Sci2010;
6: 41004.
44.
ReisRLCohnD.Polymer based systems on tissue engineering, replacement and regeneration.
Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany:
Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
45.
LiuYChan-ParkMB.Hydrogel based on interpenetrating polymer networks of dextran and gelatin for vascular tissue engineering. Biomaterials2009;
30: 196–207.
46.
TempleDKCederlundAALawlessBM, et al.
Viscoelastic properties of human and bovine articular cartilage: a comparison of frequency-dependent trends. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2016;
17: 419.
47.
AvalleMBelingardiGMontaniniR.Characterization of polymeric structural foams under compressive impact loading by means of energy-absorption diagram. Int J Impact Eng2001;
25: 455–472.
48.
VishwanathVPramanikKBiswasA.Optimization and evaluation of silk fibroin-chitosan freeze-dried porous scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering application. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed2016;
27: 657–674.
49.
SubramanianAVuDLarsenGF, et al.
Preparation and evaluation of the electrospun chitosan/PEO fibers for potential applications in cartilage tissue engineering. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed2005;
16: 861–873.
50.
BartnikowskiMWellardRWoodruffM, et al.
Tailoring hydrogel viscoelasticity with physical and chemical crosslinking. Polymers2015;
7: 2650–2669.
51.
JonesDSWoolfsonADDjokicJ.Texture profile analysis of bioadhesive polymeric semisolids: mechanical characterization and investigation of interactions between formulation components. J Appl Polym Sci1996;
61: 2229–2234.
52.
FerreiraPCalvinhoPCabritaAS, et al.
Synthesis and characterization of new methacrylate based hydrogels. Rev Bras Cienc Farm2006;
42: 419–427.
53.
HurlerJEngeslandAPoorahmary KermanyB, et al.
Improved texture analysis for hydrogel characterization: gel cohesiveness, adhesiveness, and hardness. J Appl Polym Sci2012;
125: 180–188.
54.
KrólŻMalikMMaryczK, et al.
Physicochemical properties of biopolymer hydrogels treated by direct electric current. Polymers2016;
8: 248.
55.
RosenthalAJ.Texture profile analysis – how important are the parameters? J Texture Stud2010;
41: 672–684.
56.
MajiSAgarwalTDasJ, et al.
Development of gelatin/carboxymethyl chitosan/nano-hydroxyapatite composite 3D macroporous scaffold for bone tissue engineering applications. Carbohydr Polym2018;
189: 115–125.
57.
McGawLJElgorashi Ee EloffJN. Cytotoxicity of African medicinal plants against normal animal and human cells. In: Victor K (eds) Toxicological survey of African medicinal plants. Amsterdam, Netherland: Elsevier, 2014, pp. 181–233.
