Nanoscale patterning of scaffolds provides broad surface for adhesion and differentiation of stem cells. As we know, the combination of tissue engineering with stem cells technology hold the key for regeneration of damaged tissues for example skeletal muscle tissues. On the other hand, the mechanical assessments of poly ɛ-caprolacton nanofibers determined the required features of biomedical scaffold for skeletal muscle tissue. In this study, skeletal muscle satellite cells as the main group of stem cells were cultivated on the electrospun poly ɛ-caprolacton nanofibers. Our results indicated that in comparison with tissue culture polystyrene, the nanoscale of scaffolds provided more induction to matured cells of skeletal muscle. Moreover, the immobilization of cells by collagen on poly ɛ-caprolacton nanofibers significantly improved the differential potency of satellite cells.
ChaiCLeongKW. Biomaterials approach to expand and direct differentiation of stem cells. Mol Ther2007; 15(3): 467–480.
5.
VellemanSG. Role of the extracellular matrix in muscle growth and development. J Anim Sci2002; 80: 8–13.
6.
Shekaran A and Garcia AJ. Nanoscale engineering of extracellular matrix-mimetic bioadhesive surfaces and implants for tissue engineering. Biochim Biophys Acta 2011; 1810(3): 350–360.
7.
Li WJ and Tuan RS. Fabrication and application of nanofibrous scaffolds in tissue engineering. Curr Protoc Cell Biol 2009; Chapter 25: Unit 25.2.
8.
LiangDHsiaoBSChuB. Functional electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds for biomedical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev2007; 59(14): 1392–1412.
9.
ReedCR. Composite tissue engineering on polycaprolactone nanofiber scaffolds. Ann Plast Surg2009; 62(5): 505–512.
10.
SaccoA. Self-renewal and expansion of single transplanted muscle stem cells. Nature2008; 456(7221): 502–506.
11.
UsasAHuardJ. Muscle-derived stem cells for tissue engineering and regenerative therapy. Biomaterials2007; 28(36): 5401–5406.
12.
Stern-StraeterJ. Characterization of human myoblast cultures for tissue engineering. Int J Mol Med2008; 21(1): 49–56.
13.
GharaibehB. Isolation of a slowly adhering cell fraction containing stem cells from murine skeletal muscle by the preplate technique. Nat Protoc2008; 3(9): 1501–1509.
14.
RajeshVKattiDS. Nanofibers and their applications in tissue engineering. Int J Nanomedicine2006; 1: 15–30.
15.
Scott SellCBMatthew SmithMichael McClure. Extracellular matrix regenerated: tissue engineering via electrospun biomimetic nanofibers. Polymer Int2007; 56: 1349–1360.
16.
ChoiJ. The influence of electrospun aligned poly (-caprolactone)/collagen nanofiber meshes on the formation of self-aligned skeletal muscle myotubes. Biomaterials2008; 29(19): 2899–2906.
17.
Tissaphern MirfakhraiJohnDWMRayH. Baughman. Polymer artificial muscles. Mater Today2007; 10(4): 1–64.
Jen-Taut YehM-CYChing-Ju WuChin-San Wu. Preparation and characterization of biodegradable polycaprolactone/multiwalled carbon nanotubes nanocomposites. J Appl Polymer Sci2009; 112: 660–668.
20.
NasirNFBMRahaMGKadriNA. The study of morphological structure, phase structure and molecular structure of collagen-PEO 600K blends for tissue engineering application. Am J Biochem Biotechnol2006; 2(5): 175–179.
21.
Iman ShabaniVH-AEhsan SeyedjafariFarshad Babaeijandaghi. Improved infiltration of stem cells on electrospun nanofibers. Biochem Biophys Res Commun2009; 382: 129–133.
22.
Cherng-Yuh SuChung-KweiLChii-Ruey Lin. Polymerization-like crosslinking of thermoplastic polyurethane by microwave plasma treatment. Surf Coat Technol2006; 200: 3380–3384.
23.
SangermanoMToninMYagciY. Degradable epoxy coatings by photoinitiated cationic copolymerization of bisepoxide with e-caprolactone. Eur Polymer J2010; 46: 254–259.
24.
Hashemi SM, Soleimani M, Zargarian SS, Haddadi-Asl V, et al. In vitro differentiation of human cord blood-derived unrestricted somatic stem cells into hepatocyte-like cells on poly(ɛ-caprolactone) nanofiber scaffolds. Cells Tissues Organs 2009; 190: 135–149.
Vladkova TG. Surface engineered polymeric biomaterials with improved biocontact properties. Int J Polymer Sci 2010.
27.
ZhangYZVenugopalJHuangZM. Characterization of the surface biocompatibility of the electrospun PCL-collagen nanofibers using fibroblasts. Biomacromolecules2005; 6: 2583–2589.
28.
LiuQWuJTanT. Preparation, properties and cytotoxicity evaluation of a biodegradable polyester elastomer composite. Polymer Degrad Stability2009; 94: 1427–1435.
29.
SchofarMDBoudriotUWackC. Influence of nanofibers on the growth and osteogenic differentiation of stem cells: a comparison of biological collagen nanofibers and synthetic PLLA fibers. J Mater Sci Mater Med2009; 20: 767–774.
30.
SinananACBuxtonPGLewisMP. Muscling in on stem cells. Biol Cell2006; 98(4): 203–214.
31.
TanakaKKHallJKTroyAA. Syndecan-4-Expressing Muscle Progenitor Cells in the SP Encrosslink as Satellite Cells during Muscle Regeneration. Cell Stem Cell2009; 4: 217–225.
32.
JankowskiRJDeasyBMCaoB. The role of CD34 expression and cellular fusion in the regeneration capacity of myogenic progenitor cells. J Cell Sci2002; 115: 4361–4374.
33.
PavlathGK. Spatial and functional restriction of regulatory molecules during mammalian myoblast fusion. Exp Cell Res2010; 316(18): 3067–3372.
34.
HollnagelA. The cell adhesion molecule M-cadherin is not essential for muscle development and regeneration. Mol Cell Biol2002; 22(13): 4760–4770.
35.
ZammitPS. Pax7 and myogenic progression in skeletal muscle satellite cells. J Cell Sci2006; 119(Pt 9): 1824–1832.
AsakuraARudnickiMKomakiM. Muscle satellite cells are multipotential stem cells that exhibit myogenic, osteogenic, and adipogenic differentiation. Differentiation2001; 68(4-5): 245–253.
38.
YinJ. In vitro myogenic and adipogenic differentiation model of genetically engineered bovine embryonic fibroblast cell lines. Biotechnol Lett2010; 32(2): 195–202.
ArsicNMamaevaDLambaNJ. Muscle-derived stem cells isolated as non-adherent population give rise to cardiac, skeletal muscle and neural lineages. Exp Cell Res2008; 314(6): 1266–1280.
