Mature Trauma Intensivist Model Improves Intensive Care Unit Efficiency But Not Mortality

Abstract

Background:

Although the Leap Frog intensivist staffing model has been shown to improve outcomes in the intensive care unit (ICU), to date, no one has examined the effect of an intensivist model in a dedicated trauma ICU. With stricter adherence to evidence-based protocols and 24-hour availability, we hypothesized that a mature intensivist model in a trauma ICU would decrease mortality.

Methods:

Level II trauma center trauma ICU admissions 2006 to 2011. The ICU care provided by 6 trauma intensivists. Two periods were compared: early (2006-2008) and mature (2009-2011). Patients matched on age, Injury Severity Score (ISS), preexisting conditions, and so on in a univariate analysis, with significant variables placed in a logistic regression model, with mortality as the outcome.

Results:

A total of 3527 patients (2999 excluding do not resuscitate status) were reviewed. Age ≥65 (odds ratio [OR] 2.38, P < .001), ISS ≥17 (OR 3.3, P < .001), coagulopathy (OR 1.64, P = .004), and anemia (OR 1.73, P = .02) were independent predictors of mortality. Multivariate logistic model encompassing these factors found no statistically significant differences in mortality across the 6-year period. The ICU efficiency showed significant improvements in terms of ventilator days (30.1% EARLY vs 24.4% MATURE; P < .001), decreases in mean consultant use per patient (0.55 ± 0.85 EARLY vs 0.40 ± 0.74 MATURE; P < .001), and increase in number of bedside procedures per patient (0.09 ± 0.48 EARLY vs 0.40 ± 0.74 MATURE; P < .001

Conclusions:

Our mature intensivists staffing model shows improvement in ICU throughput (ventilator days, ICU days, decreased consultant use, and increased bedside procedures) but no survival benefit. Further improvements in overall trauma mortality may lie in the resuscitative and operative phase of patient care.

Keywords

trauma intensivist model efficiency mortality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Demetriades

Martin

Salim

Rhee

Brown

Chan

. The effect of trauma center designation and trauma volume on outcome in specific severe injuries. Ann Surg. 2005;242(4):512–517.

Scarborough

Slone

Uribe

Craun

Bar-Or

. Reduced mortality at a community hospital trauma center: the impact of changing trauma level designation from II to I. Arch Surg. 2008;143(1):22–27.

Glance

Osler

Mukamel

Dick

. Impact of trauma center designation on outcomes: is there a difference between level I and level II trauma centers? J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(3):372–378.

Haut

Chang

Efron

Cornwell

III . Injured patients have lower mortality when treated by “full-time” trauma surgeons vs. surgeons who cover trauma “part-time”. J Trauma. 2006;61(2):272–278.

Haut

Chang

Hayanga

Efron

Haider

Cornwell

III . Surgeon- and system-based influences on trauma mortality. Arch Surg. 2009;144(8):759–764.

Richardson

Schmieg

Boaz

. Impact of trauma attending surgeon case volume on outcome: is more better? J Trauma. 1998;44(2):266–271.

MacKenzie

Rivara

Jurkovich

. A National evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(4):366–378.

Wallace

Angus

Barnato

Kramer

Kahn

. Nighttime intensivist staffing and mortality among critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(22):2093–2101.

Haas

Jurkovich

Wang

Rivara

Mackenzie

Nathens

. Survival advantage in trauma centers: expeditious intervention or experience? J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208(1):28–36.

10.

Peitzman

Courcoulas

Stinson

Udekwu

Billiar

Harbrecht

. Trauma center maturation: quantification of process and outcome. Ann Surg.1999;230(1):87–94.

11.

Papa

Langland-Orban

Kallenborn

. Assessing effectiveness of a mature trauma system: association of trauma center presence with lower injury mortality rate. J Trauma. 2006;61(2):261–266.

12.

Pronovost

Angus

Dorman

Robinson

Dremsizov

Young

. Physician staffing patterns and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: a systematic review. JAMA. 2002;288(17):2151–2162.

13.

Nathens

Rivara

MacKenzie

. The impact of an intensivist-model ICU on trauma-related mortality. Ann Surg. 2006;244(4):545–554.

14.

Lee

Rogers

Horst

. Application of a trauma intensivist model to a level II community hospital trauma program improves intensive care unit throughput. J Trauma. 2010;69(5):1147–1152.

15.

Rogers

Osler

Lee

. In a mature trauma system, there is no difference in outcome (survival) between level I and level II trauma centers. J Truama. 2011;70(6):1354–1357.

16.

The Leapfrog Group. ICU Physician Staffing (IPS). Revision March 3, 2009. http://www.leapfroggroup.org. Accessed August 15, 2013.

17.

Rivers

Nguyen

Havstad

. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(19):1368–1377.

18.

Bradburn

Rogers

Krasne

. High risk geriatric protocol: improving mortality in the elderly. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(2):435–440.

19.

MacLeod

Lynn

McKenney

Jeroukhimov

Cohn

. Predictors of mortality in trauma patients. Am Surg. 2004;70(9):805–810.

20.

Dutton

Stansbury

Leone

Kramer

Hess

Scalea

. Trauma mortality in mature trauma systems: are we doing better? an analysis of trauma mortality patterns, 1997-2008. J Trauma. 2010;69(3):620–626.

21.

DuBose

Inaba

Shiflett

. Measurable outcomes of quality improvement in the trauma intensive care unit: the impact of daily quality rounding checklist. J Trauma. 2008;64(1):22–27.