This study reports novel biomimetic polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) hydrogels modified with poly (2-acrylamido-2-ethylpropanesulfonic acid; PAMPS), mica and multi-walled carboxylated carbon nanotubes (CNTCOOH) and evaluates how filler identity and microstructure control functional properties for cartilage like applications. Spectroscopy and elemental mapping confirmed the presence and chemical integrity of all additives. Electron microscopy showed an interconnected porous network whose pore size increases with PAMPS, decreases with mica, and enlarges with CNTCOOH. Combining mica with CNTCOOH produced a denser network that strengthened the material but reduced fluid uptake. Measured water content (WC) ranged from 88.0% to 93.2%. The CNTCOOH rich composition swelled fastest and reached an equilibrium swelling ratio (SR) near 1692%, while the dual filler composition displayed limited swelling. Mechanical testing showed that the dual filler composition achieved the highest tensile strength (TS) of 0.55 MPa and the greatest elongation at break of 165% and also exhibited the highest compressive stiffness under large strain. In contrast, porous CNT rich samples absorbed fluid rapidly but had lower TS. Friction testing under joint like conditions identified hydration lubrication as the main low friction mechanism and the using both filler enriched samples produced the low coefficient of friction (COF) near 0.066. Wear tests after extended cycling revealed low average wear depths for the dual filler hydrogel and only minor surface flattening without cracking or delamination. Together these results demonstrate that deliberate choice and combination of fillers allow predictable tuning of swelling behavior, lubrication and mechanical resilience to meet different biomedical needs.
CensiRDubbiniAMatricardiP.Bioactive hydrogel scaffolds - advances in cartilage regeneration through controlled drug delivery. Curr Pharm Des2015; 21(12): 1545–1555.
2.
EslahiNAbdorahimMSimchiA.Smart polymeric hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering: a review on the chemistry and biological functions. Biomacromolecules2016; 17(11): 3441–3463.
3.
Sophia FoxAJBediARodeoSA.The basic science of articular cartilage: structure, composition, and function. Sports health2009; 1(6): 461–468.
4.
ZhouLGuoPD’EsteM, et al. Functionalized hydrogels for articular cartilage tissue engineering. Engineering2022; 13: 71–90.
5.
BobicV.Current status of the articular cartilage repair. e-biomed2000; 1(4): 37–41.
6.
KhanIMGilbertSJSinghraoSK, et al. Cartilage integration: evaluation of the reasons for failure of integration during cartilage repair. A review. Eur Cell Mater2008; 16(16): 26–39.
7.
SharkeyPFHozackWJRothmanRH, et al. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today?Clin Orthop Relat Res2002; 404: 7–13.
8.
Javan AlmasiMXiongD. Recent progress in bionic hydrogels for articular cartilage: tribological and mechanical characteristics. J Bionic Eng2024; 21(2): 653–673.
9.
QinCYangHLuY, et al. Tribology in nature: inspirations for advanced lubrication materials. Adv Mater2025; 37: 2420626.
10.
NečasDYarimitsuSRebendaD, et al. On the replacement of articular cartilage: the friction of PVA hydrogel layer in hip simulator test. Tribol Int2023; 178: 108100.
11.
NečasDVrbkaMMarianM, et al. Towards the understanding of lubrication mechanisms in total knee replacements – part I: experimental investigations. Tribol Int2021; 156: 106874.
12.
MurakamiTYarimitsuSNakashimaK, et al. Superior lubricity in articular cartilage and artificial hydrogel cartilage. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology2014; 228(10): 1099–1111.
13.
MurakamiTSakaiNYarimitsuS, et al. Evaluation of influence of changes in permeability with aging on friction and biphasic behaviors of artificial hydrogel cartilage. Biotribology2021; 26: 100178.
14.
YarimitsuSYoshidaASasakiS, et al. Evaluation of lubrication property of Poly(vinyl alcohol) hybrid gel for artificial articular cartilage. Tribol Online2016; 11(2): 360–365.
15.
Javan AlmasiMAbdelhusseinAXiongD. Durable bionic hydrogels nanocomposite with cartilage-mimetic charge: tailoring tribological and mechanical properties with functionalized carbon nanotubes for artificial cartilage. J Biomater Appl. Epub ahead of print December 2025. DOI: 10.1177/08853282251405354.
16.
AlmasiMJFanaei SheikholeslamiTNaghdiMR.Band gap study of polyaniline and polyaniline/MWNT nanocomposites with in situ polymerization method. Compos B Eng2016; 96: 63–68.
17.
NonoyamaTGongJP.Tough double network hydrogel and its biomedical applications. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng2021; 12(1): 393–410.
18.
CuiLChenJYanC, et al. Mechanical and biotribological properties of PVA/SB triple-network hydrogel for biomimetic artificial cartilage. J Bionic Eng2023; 20(3): 1072–1082.
19.
YuPLiYSunH, et al. Cartilage-inspired hydrogel with mechanical adaptability, controllable lubrication, and inflammation regulation abilities. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2022; 14(23): 27360–27370.
20.
GuanPJiYKangX, et al. Biodegradable dual-cross-linked hydrogels with stem cell differentiation regulatory properties promote growth plate injury repair via controllable three-dimensional mechanics and a cartilage-like extracellular matrix. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2023; 15(7): 8986–8998.
21.
ChenQZhangXChenK, et al. Bilayer hydrogels with low friction and high load-bearing capacity by mimicking the oriented hierarchical structure of cartilage. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2022; 14(46): 52347–52358.
22.
ZhaoWZhangYZhaoX, et al. Bioinspired design of a cartilage-like lubricated composite with mechanical robustness. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2022; 14(7): 9899–9908.
23.
YangFZhaoJKoshutWJ, et al. A synthetic hydrogel composite with the mechanical behavior and durability of cartilage. Adv Funct Mater2020; 30(36): 2003451.
24.
YuanSChenXZhangC.Reducing friction by control of isoelectric point: a potential method to design artificial cartilage. Adv Mater Interfaces2020; 7(15): 2000485.
25.
FengHWangSChenK, et al. Dual-network nanocomposite robust hydrogel with excellent durability properties as cartilage replacement. Tribol Int2024; 194: 109518.
26.
ElídóttirKLScottLLewisR, et al. Biomimetic approach to articular cartilage tissue engineering using carbon nanotube-coated and textured polydimethylsiloxane scaffolds. Ann N Y Acad Sci2022; 1513(1): 48–64.
27.
SeifiSShamlooABarzokiAK, et al. Engineering biomimetic scaffolds for bone regeneration: chitosan/alginate/polyvinyl alcohol-based double-network hydrogels with carbon nanomaterials. Carbohydr Polym2024; 339: 122232.
28.
WangJHuangCWangY, et al. Exploration of the single-walled carbon nanotubes’ influence for cartilage repair. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp2020; 606: 125520.
29.
AwasthiSGaurJKPandeySK, et al. High-strength, strongly bonded nanocomposite hydrogels for cartilage repair. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2021; 13(21): 24505–24523.
30.
GuoZBiYWuZ, et al. Biomimetic PVA hydrogel and MMT reinforced TPU water-lubricated bearing materials for superior frictional properties and wear resistance. Wear2025; 571: 205786.
31.
MowVCGuoXE.Mechano-electrochemical properties of articular cartilage: their inhomogeneities and anisotropies. Annu Rev Biomed Eng2002; 4(1): 175–209.
32.
HeW WReaumeM MHennenfentM M, et al. Biomimetic hydrogels with spatial- and temporal-controlled chemical cues for tissue engineering. Biomater Sci2020; 8(12): 3248–3269.
33.
AbdelhusseinAYangGAlmasiMJ, et al. Employing a novel carbon fiber/epoxy and date seed powder composition to improve the tribological and mechanical properties. J Compos Mater2025; 59(24): 2765–2778.
34.
GuptaNGuptaSMSharmaSK.Preparation of stable metal/COOH-MWCNT hybrid nanofluid. Mater Today Proc2021; 36: 649–656.
35.
MalekiAHamesadeghiUDaraeiH, et al. Amine functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes: single and binary systems for high capacity dye removal. Chem Eng J2017; 313: 826–835.
36.
AliSRehmanSAUShahIA, et al. Efficient removal of zinc from water and wastewater effluents by hydroxylated and carboxylated carbon nanotube membranes: behaviors and mechanisms of dynamic filtration. J Hazard Mater2019; 365: 64–73.
37.
LiuXYangKChangM, et al. Fabrication of cellulose nanocrystal reinforced nanocomposite hydrogel with self-healing properties. Carbohydr Polym2020; 240: 116289.
38.
OmerAMSadikWAEl-DemerdashAM, et al. Fabrication of semi-interpenetrated PVA/PAMPS hydrogel as a reusable adsorbent for cationic methylene blue dye: isotherms, kinetics and thermodynamics studies. Polym Bull2021; 78: 6649–6673.
39.
Javan AlmasiMGongCAbdelhusseinA, et al. Bionic double-network hydrogel nanocomposites reinforced with carboxylated carbon nanotubes: a comprehensive mechanical and tribological study for low friction applications. Macromol Res. Epub ahead of print March 2026. DOI: 10.1007/s13233-026-00505-y.
40.
DaiSWangSDongX, et al. A transparent, tough self-healing hydrogel based on a dual physically and chemically triple crosslinked network. J Mater Chem C2019; 7(46): 14581–14587.
41.
ShahverdiMSeifiSAkbariA, et al. Melt electrowriting of PLA, PCL, and composite PLA/PCL scaffolds for tissue engineering application. Sci Rep2022; 12(1): 19935.
42.
ArjmandiMRamezaniMNandA, et al. Experimental study on friction and wear properties of interpenetrating polymer network alginate-polyacrylamide hydrogels for use in minimally-invasive joint implants. Wear2018; 406–407: 194–204.
43.
Corzo-GonzálezZLoria-BastarracheaMIHernández-NuñezE, et al. Preparation and characterization of crosslinked PVA/PAMPS blends catalytic membranes for biodiesel production. Polym Bull2017; 74: 2741–2754.
44.
Abu-SaiedMASolimanEAAbualnajKM, et al. Highly conductive polyelectrolyte membranes poly(vinyl alcohol)/Poly(2-acrylamido-2-methyl propane sulfonic acid) (PVA/PAMPS) for fuel cell application. Polymers2021; 13(16): 2638.
45.
FaliAGamageSHowardM, et al. Nanoscale spectroscopy of dielectric properties of mica. ACS Photonics2021; 8(1): 175–181.
46.
Camarero-EspinosaSRothen-RutishauserBFosterEJ, et al. Articular cartilage: from formation to tissue engineering. Biomater Sci2016; 4(5): 734–767.
47.
ClaydenJGreevesNWarrenS.Organic chemistry. Oxford University Press, 2012.
48.
PapageorgiouDGLiZLiuM, et al. Mechanisms of mechanical reinforcement by graphene and carbon nanotubes in polymer nanocomposites. Nanoscale2020; 12(4): 2228–2267.
49.
LeeS-YPereiraBPYusofN, et al. Unconfined compression properties of a porous poly(vinyl alcohol)-chitosan-based hydrogel after hydration. Acta Biomater2009; 5(6): 1919–1925.
50.
PanYXiongD.Study on compressive mechanical properties of nanohydroxyapatite reinforced poly(vinyl alcohol) gel composites as biomaterial. J Mater Sci Mater Med2009; 20: 1291–1297.
51.
MurakamiTSakaiNYamaguchiT, et al. Evaluation of a superior lubrication mechanism with biphasic hydrogels for artificial cartilage. Tribol Int2015; 89: 19–26.
52.
GongJP.Friction and lubrication of hydrogels-its richness and complexity. Soft Matter2006; 2(7): 544–552.
53.
LinPZhangRWangX, et al. Articular cartilage inspired bilayer tough hydrogel prepared by interfacial modulated polymerization showing excellent combination of high load-bearing and low friction performance. ACS Macro Lett2016; 5(11): 1191–1195.
54.
KurokawaTTominagaTKatsuyamaY, et al. Elastic–hydrodynamic transition of gel friction. Langmuir2005; 21(19): 8643–8648.
55.
BavarescoVPZavagliaCACReisMC, et al. Study on the tribological properties of phema hydrogels for use in artificial articular cartilage. Wear2008; 265(3-4): 269–277.
56.
AnsariMDarvishiASabzevariA.A review of advanced hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering. Front Bioeng Biotechnol2024; 12: 1340893.
57.
ChowdhuryNFaisalSKumarA, et al. Characterization of hydrogel properties in the advancement of bio-tribology. In: WalkerJMKumarAKumarA (eds.) Applications of biotribology in biomedical systems. Springer, Cham, 2024, pp.27–78.
58.
OungoulianSRDurneyKMJonesBK, et al. Wear and damage of articular cartilage with friction against orthopedic implant materials. J Biomech2015; 48(10): 1957–1964.
59.
SimonTMJacksonDW.Articular cartilage: injury pathways and treatment options. Sports Med Arthrosc2006; 14(3): 146–154.
60.
CustersRJHDhertWJAvan RijenMHP, et al. Articular damage caused by metal plugs in a rabbit model for treatment of localized cartilage defects. Osteoarthr Cartil2007; 15(8): 937–945.
61.
WuYLiXWangY, et al. Research progress on mechanical properties and wear resistance of cartilage repair hydrogel. Mater Des2022; 216: 110575.
62.
MowVCKueiSCLaiWM, et al. Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage in compression: theory and experiments. J Biomech Eng1980; 102(1): 73–84.
63.
CharnleyJ.The lubrication of animal joints in relation to surgical reconstruction by arthroplasty. Ann Rheum Dis1960; 19(1): 10–19.
64.
JayGDHaberstrohKChaCJ.Comparison of the boundary-lubricating ability of bovine synovial fluid, lubricin, and healon. J Biomed Mater Res1998; 40(3): 414–418.
65.
UnsworthADowsonDWrightV.Some new evidence on human joint lubrication. Ann Rheum Dis1975; 34(4): 277–285.
66.
GleghornJPBonassarLJ.Lubrication mode analysis of articular cartilage using Stribeck surfaces. J Biomech2008; 41(9): 1910–1918.
67.
MaLGaisinskaya-KipnisAKampfN, et al. Origins of hydration lubrication. Nat Commun2015; 6(1): 6060.
68.
EschweilerJHornNRathB, et al. The biomechanics of cartilage-an overview. Life2021; 11(4): 302.
69.
AbbotAELevineWNMowVC.Biomechanics of the articular cartilage. The adult knee2003; 1: 81.
70.
MengYCaoJChenY, et al. 3D printing of a poly(vinyl alcohol)-based nano-composite hydrogel as an artificial cartilage replacement and the improvement mechanism of printing accuracy. J Mater Chem B2020; 8(4): 677–690.
71.
ChenQLiuSYuanZ, et al. Construction and tribological properties of biomimetic cartilage-lubricating hydrogels. Gels2022; 8(7): 415.
72.
CuiLLiHGongC, et al. A biomimetic bilayer coating on laser-textured Ti6Al4V alloy with excellent surface wettability and biotribological properties for artificial joints. Ceram Int2022; 48(18): 26264–26273.
73.
OsaheniAOMatherPTBlumMM.Mechanics and tribology of a zwitterionic polymer blend: impact of molecular weight. Mater Sci Eng C2020; 111: 110736.
LiuYXiongD.A tannic acid-reinforced PEEK-hydrogel composite material with good biotribological and self-healing properties for artificial joints. J Mater Chem B2021; 9(38): 8021–8030.
76.
XiaoFTangJHuangX, et al. A robust, low swelling, and lipid-lubricated hydrogel for bionic articular cartilage substitute. J Colloid Interface Sci2023; 629: 467–477.
77.
ZhangRZhaoWNingF, et al. Alginate fiber-enhanced poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels with superior lubricating property and biocompatibility. Polymers2022; 14(19): 4063.
78.
LiJGaoLXuR, et al. Fibers reinforced composite hydrogels with improved lubrication and load-bearing capacity. Friction2022; 10: 54–67.
79.
YeZLuHChaiG, et al. Glycerol-modified poly(vinyl alcohol)/poly(ethylene glycol) self-healing hydrogel for artificial cartilage. Polym Int2023; 72(1): 27–38.
80.
ShiYLiuJLiJ, et al. Improved mechanical and tribological properties of paam/PVA hydrogel-Ti6Al4V alloy configuration for cartilage repair. J Polym Res2022; 29(12): 515.
81.
DengSWangLZhaoC, et al. Low coefficient of friction hydrogels with fast self-healing properties inspired by articular cartilage. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp2023; 656: 130380.
82.
ChenJCuiLYanC, et al. Mechanical and tribological study of PVA–pmpdsah double-network hydrogel prepared by ultraviolet irradiation and freeze–thaw methods for bionic articular cartilage. J Bionic Eng2021; 18: 1192–1201.
83.
CuiLTongWZhouH, et al. PVA-BA/PEG hydrogel with bilayer structure for biomimetic articular cartilage and investigation of its biotribological and mechanical properties. J Mater Sci2021; 56: 3935–3946.
