Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Durable bionic hydrogels nanocomposite with cartilage-mimetic charge: Tailoring tribological and mechanical properties with functionalized carbon nanotubes for artificial cartilage
Advances in understanding natural articular cartilage have led to the development of bionic repair materials, with hydrogel composites emerging as a promising option due to their low friction, high water content, and customizable mechanical properties. This study investigates PVA/PAMPS/FMWCNT hydrogels, focusing on the role of negatively charged groups in enhancing performance. FTIR analysis confirmed the integration of PVA, PAMPS. SEM revealed a porous structure resembling cartilage, with carboxyl-functionalized samples showing the largest pores and achieved a 1853% swelling ratio, while hydroxyl- and amine-functionalized samples had smaller pores and greater crosslink density. Mechanical tests showed hydroxyl-functionalized samples achieved 1.01 MPa tensile stress and 237% elongation, whereas carboxyl-functionalized samples, despite strong hydrogen bonding, had inferior mechanical properties due to high porosity. Tribological tests demonstrated carboxyl-functionalized samples had the 0.0346 coefficient of friction (COF), attributed to their high negative charge density and hydration lubrication. Long-term friction tests revealed a stable coefficient (0.07), demonstrating sustained frictional stability under extended sliding conditions. These findings highlight the importance of functionalized multiwall carbon nanotubes (FMWCNT) and negatively charged groups in optimizing hydrogels for cartilage repair, offering insights for developing bionic materials.
CensiRDubbiniAMatricardiP. Bioactive hydrogel scaffolds - advances in cartilage regeneration through controlled drug delivery. Curr Pharm Des2015; 21: 1545–1555.
2.
EslahiNAbdorahimMSimchiA. Smart polymeric hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering: a review on the chemistry and biological functions. Biomacromolecules2016; 17: 3441–3463.
3.
Sophia FoxAJBediARodeoSA. The basic science of articular cartilage: structure, composition, and function. Sports health2009; 1: 461–468.
4.
ZhouLGuoPD’EsteM, et al. Functionalized hydrogels for articular cartilage tissue engineering. Engineering. 2022; 13: 71–90.
5.
BobicV. E-biomed: A journal of regenerative medicine, 2000, vol 1, pp. 37–41.
6.
KhanIMGilbertSJSinghraoS, et al.Cartilage integration: evaluation of the reasons for failure of integration during cartilage repair. A review. Eur Cell Mater2008; 16: 26–39.
7.
SharkeyPFHozackWJRothmanRH, et al. Why are total knee arthroplastiesfailing today?Clin Orthop Relat Res (1976-2007). 2002; 404: 7–13.
8.
Javan AlmasiMXiongD. Recent progress in bionic hydrogels for articular cartilage: tribological and mechanical characteristics. J Bionic Eng2024; 21: 653–673.
9.
QinCYangHLuY, et al.Tribology in nature: inspirations for advanced lubrication materials. Adv Mater2025; 17: 2420626.
10.
NonoyamaTGongJP. Tough double network hydrogel and its biomedical applications. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng2021; 12: 393–410.
11.
CuiLChenJYanC, et al.Mechanical and biotribological properties of PVA/SB triple-network hydrogel for biomimetic artificial cartilage. J Bionic Eng2023; 20: 1072–1082.
12.
YuPLiYSunH, et al. Cartilage-inspired hydrogel with mechanical adaptability, controllable lubrication, and inflammation regulation abilities. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022; 14(23): 27360–27370.
13.
GuanPJiYKangX, et al. Biodegradable dual-cross-linked hydrogels with stem cell differentiation regulatory properties promote growth plate injury repair via controllable three-dimensional mechanics and a cartilage-like extracellular matrix. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2023; 15(7): 8986–8998.
14.
ChenQZhangXChenK, et al. Bilayer hydrogels with low friction and high load-bearing capacity by mimicking the oriented hierarchical structure of cartilage. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022; 14(46): 52347–52358.
15.
ZhaoWZhangYZhaoX, et al. Bioinspired design of a cartilage-like lubricated composite with mechanical robustness. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022; 14(7): 9899–9908.
16.
YangFZhaoJKoshutWJ, et al.A synthetic hydrogel composite with the mechanical behavior and durability of cartilage. Adv Funct Mater2020; 30: 2003451.
17.
YuanSChenXZhangC. Reducing friction by control of isoelectric point: a potential method to design artificial cartilage. Adv Mater Interfac2020; 7: 2000485.
18.
FengHWangSChenK, et al.Dual-network nanocomposite robust hydrogel with excellent durability properties as cartilage replacement. Tribol Int2024; 194: 109518.
19.
ElídóttirKLScottLLewisR, et al. Biomimetic approach to articular cartilage tissue engineering using carbon nanotube–coated and textured polydimethylsiloxane scaffolds. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2022; 1513(1): 48–64.
20.
SeifiSShamlooABarzokiAK, et al.Engineering biomimetic scaffolds for bone regeneration: chitosan/alginate/polyvinyl alcohol-based double-network hydrogels with carbon nanomaterials. Carbohydr Polym2024; 339: 122232.
21.
WangJHuangCWangY, et al.Exploration of the single-walled carbon nanotubes’ influence for cartilage repair. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp2020; 606: 125520.
22.
AwasthiSGaurJKPandeySK, et al. High-strength, strongly bonded nanocomposite hydrogels for cartilage repair. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021; 13(21): 24505–24523.
23.
GuoZBiYWuZ, et al. Biomimetic PVA hydrogel and MMT reinforced TPU water-lubricated bearing materials for superior frictional properties and wear resistance. Wear. 2025; 571: 205786.
24.
AbdelhusseinAYangGAlmasiMJ, et al. “Employing a novel carbon fiber/epoxy and date seed powder composition to improve the tribological and mechanical properties”. J Compos Mater. 2025; 59(24): 00219983251341069.
25.
MowVCGuoXE. Mechano-electrochemical properties of articular cartilage: their inhomogeneities and anisotropies. Annu Rev Biomed Eng2002; 4: 175–209.
26.
HeWReaumeMHennenfentM, et al.Biomimetic hydrogels with spatial- and temporal-controlled chemical cues for tissue engineering. Biomater Sci2020; 8: 3248–3269.
27.
GuptaNGuptaSMSharmaS. Preparation of stable metal/COOH-MWCNT hybrid nanofluid. Mater Today Proc2021; 36: 649–656.
28.
MalekiAHamesadeghiUDaraeiH, et al.Amine functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes: single and binary systems for high capacity dye removal. Chem Eng J2017; 313: 826–835.
29.
AliSRehmanSAUShahIA, et al.Efficient removal of zinc from water and wastewater effluents by hydroxylated and carboxylated carbon nanotube membranes: behaviors and mechanisms of dynamic filtration. J Hazard Mater2019; 365: 64–73.
30.
LiuXYangKChangM, et al.Fabrication of cellulose nanocrystal reinforced nanocomposite hydrogel with self-healing properties. Carbohydr Polym2020; 240: 116289.
31.
OmerAMSadikWAAEl-DemerdashAGM, et al. Fabrication of semi-interpenetrated PVA/PAMPS hydrogel as a reusable adsorbent for cationic methylene blue dye: isotherms, kinetics and thermodynamics studies. Polym Bull. 2021; 78: 6649–6673.
32.
DaiSWangSDongX, et al.A transparent, tough self-healing hydrogel based on a dual physically and chemically triple crosslinked network. J Mater Chem C Mater2019; 7: 14581–14587.
33.
ShahverdiMSeifiSAkbariA, et al.Melt electrowriting of PLA, PCL, and composite PLA/PCL scaffolds for tissue engineering application. Sci Rep2022; 12: 19935.
34.
CuiLTongWZhouH, et al.PVA-BA/PEG hydrogel with bilayer structure for biomimetic articular cartilage and investigation of its biotribological and mechanical properties. J Mater Sci2021; 56: 3935–3946.
35.
LiuYXiongDZhaoX. Improved biotribological properties of polyetheretherketone composites for artificial joints with a ‘soft-on-hard’ structure and brushlike molecules. Tribol Int2020; 145: 106165.
36.
ArjmandiMRamezaniMNandA, et al. Experimental study on friction and wear properties of interpenetrating polymer network alginate-polyacrylamide hydrogels for use in minimally-invasive joint implants. Wear. 2018; 406: 194–204.
37.
Corzo-GonzálezZLoria-BastarracheaMIHernández-NuñezE, et al. Preparation and characterization of crosslinked PVA/PAMPS blends catalytic membranes for biodiesel production. Polym Bull. 2017; 74: 2741–2754.
38.
Abu-SaiedMSolimanEAAbualnajKM, et al.Highly conductive polyelectrolyte membranes Poly(vinyl alcohol)/Poly(2-acrylamido-2-methyl propane sulfonic acid) (PVA/PAMPS) for fuel cell application. Polymers2021; 13: 2638.
39.
ClaydenJGreevesNWarrenS. Organic chemistry. Oxford University Press, 2012.
40.
Camarero-EspinosaSRothen-RutishauserBFosterEJ, et al.Articular cartilage: from formation to tissue engineering. Biomater Sci2016; 4: 734–767.
PapageorgiouDGLiZLiuM, et al.Mechanisms of mechanical reinforcement by graphene and carbon nanotubes in polymer nanocomposites. Nanoscale2020; 12: 2228–2267.
43.
LeeS-YPereiraBPYusofN, et al.Unconfined compression properties of a porous poly(vinyl alcohol)-chitosan-based hydrogel after hydration. Acta Biomater2009; 5: 1919–1925.
44.
PanYXiongD. Study on compressive mechanical properties of nanohydroxyapatite reinforced poly(vinyl alcohol) gel composites as biomaterial. J Mater Sci Mater Med2009; 20: 1291–1297.
45.
MurakamiTSakaiNYamaguchiT, et al.Evaluation of a superior lubrication mechanism with biphasic hydrogels for artificial cartilage. Tribol Int2015; 89: 19–26.
46.
GongJP. Friction and lubrication of hydrogels-its richness and complexity. Soft Matter2006; 2: 544–552.
47.
LinPZhangRWangX, et al.Articular cartilage inspired bilayer tough hydrogel prepared by interfacial modulated polymerization showing excellent combination of high load-bearing and low friction performance. ACS Macro Lett2016; 5: 1191–1195.
48.
KurokawaTTominagaTKatsuyamaY, et al.Elastic-hydrodynamic transition of gel friction. Langmuir2005; 21: 8643–8648.
49.
MowVCKueiSLaiWM, et al. Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage in compression: theory and experiments. Journal of biomechanical engineering. 1980; 102(1): 73–84.
50.
CharnleyJ. The lubrication of animal joints in relation to surgical reconstruction by arthroplasty. Ann Rheum Dis1960; 19: 10–19.
51.
JayGDHaberstrohKChaCJ. Comparison of the boundary-lubricating ability of bovine synovial fluid, lubricin, and healon. J Biomed Mater Res1998; 40: 414–418.
52.
UnsworthADowsonDWrightV. Some new evidence on human joint lubrication. Ann Rheum Dis1975; 34: 277–285.
53.
GleghornJPBonassarLJ. Lubrication mode analysis of articular cartilage using Stribeck surfaces. J Biomech2008; 41: 1910–1918.
54.
MaLGaisinskaya-KipnisAKampfN, et al.Origins of hydration lubrication. Nat Commun2015; 6: 6060.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
