Injectable in situ-forming hydrogels appears to be a promising approach for tissue engineering applications. In this study, the effect of phenol moiety (Ph) addition to gelatin in enzymatically-gellable modified pectin hydrogel (Pec-Ph) was studied. Addition of gelatin-Ph to Pec-Ph (Pec-Ph/Gel-Ph) altered the physical properties of Pec-Ph-based hydrogels as compared to unmodified gelatin (Pec-Ph/Gel) addition. Swelling ratio and degradation rates of the Pec-Ph/Gel-Ph hydrogel decreased 35% and 50%, respectively, and the elasticity of Pec-Ph/Gel-Ph hydrogel was higher than the Pec-Ph/Gel hydrogels. Scanning electron microscopy images showed that the existence of phenolic groups in gelatin decreased the pore size of Pec-Ph/Gel-Ph hydrogels. Culture of chondrocyte cells in the Pec-Ph/Gel-Ph hydrogels showed more metabolic activity (4×) during a 14-day culture period. Hydrogels subcutaneously implanted in rats could also be identified readily without complete absorption and signs of toxicity or any untoward reactions after 1 month. The work showed the potential of Pec-Ph/Gel-Ph hydrogels as a promising in situ injectable hydrogel for soft tissue engineering applications.
GhorbaniMRoshangarLSoleimani RadJ. Development of reinforced chitosan/pectin scaffold by using the cellulose nanocrystals as nanofillers: an injectable hydrogel for tissue engineering. Eur Polym J2020; 130: 109697.
2.
GuLLiTSongX, et al. Preparation and characterization of methacrylated gelatin/bacterial cellulose composite hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering. Regen Biomater2020; 7: 195–202.
3.
SetayeshmehrMEsfandiariERafieiniaM, et al. Hybrid and composite scaffolds based on extracellular matrices for cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part B Rev2019; 25: 202–224.
4.
MorshedlooFKhoshfetratABKazemiD, et al. Gelatin improves peroxidase-mediated alginate hydrogel characteristics as a potential injectable hydrogel for soft tissue engineering applications. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater2020; 108: 2950–2960.
5.
Puertas-BartoloméMBenito-GarzónLOlmeda-LozanoM. In situ cross-linkable polymer systems and composites for osteochondral regeneration. In: OliveiraJPinaSReisR, et al. (eds) Osteochondral tissue engineering. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. Cham: Springer, 2018, pp.327–355, Vol. 1058.
6.
KuoK-CLinR-ZTienH-W, et al. Bioengineering vascularized tissue constructs using an injectable cell-laden enzymatically crosslinked collagen hydrogel derived from dermal extracellular matrix. Acta Biomater2015; 27: 151–166.
7.
LiuMZengXMaC, et al. Injectable hydrogels for cartilage and bone tissue engineering. Bone Res2017; 5: 17014.
8.
TavakolMVasheghani-FarahaniESoleimaniM, et al. Synthesis and characterization of an enzyme mediated in situ forming hydrogel based on gum tragacanth for biomedical applications. Iran J Biotechnol2014; 12: 42–49.
9.
HouSLakeRParkS, et al. Injectable macroporous hydrogel formed by enzymatic cross-linking of gelatin microgels. ACS applied bio materials2018; 1: 1430–1439.
10.
ChenFYuSLiuB, et al. An injectable enzymatically crosslinked carboxymethylated pullulan/chondroitin sulfate hydrogel for cartilage tissue engineering. Sci Rep2016; 6: 20014.
11.
ChenFNiYLiuB, et al. Self-crosslinking and injectable hyaluronic acid/RGD-functionalized pectin hydrogel for cartilage tissue engineering. Carbohydr Polym2017; 166: 31–44.
12.
AfewerkiSSheikhiAKannanS, et al. Gelatin-polysaccharide composite scaffolds for 3D cell culture and tissue engineering: towards natural therapeutics. Bioeng Transl Med2019; 4: 96–115.
13.
JaipanPNguyenANarayanRJ. Gelatin-based hydrogels for biomedical applications. MRS Commun2017; 7: 416–426.
14.
ZhaoWDuZFangJ, et al. Synthetic/natural blended polymer fibrous meshes composed of polylactide, gelatin and glycosaminoglycan for cartilage repair. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed2020; 31: 1437–1456.
15.
BalakrishnanBJoshiNJayakrishnanA, et al. Self-crosslinked oxidized alginate/gelatin hydrogel as injectable, adhesive biomimetic scaffolds for cartilage regeneration. Acta Biomater2014; 10: 3650–3663.
16.
NaghizadehZKarkhanehAKhojastehA. Self-crosslinking effect of chitosan and gelatin on alginate based hydrogels: injectable in situ forming scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C2018; 89: 256–264.
17.
RoselliniEZhangYSMiglioriB, et al. Protein/polysaccharide-based scaffolds mimicking native extracellular matrix for cardiac tissue engineering applications. J Biomed Mater Res A2018; 106: 769–781.
18.
WangYChenYXuY, et al. Effects of the bonding intensity between hyaluronan and gelatin on chondrogenic phenotypic maintenance. J Mater Chem B2020; 8: 9062–9074.
19.
NoreenANazliZIAkramJ, et al. Pectins functionalized biomaterials; a new viable approach for biomedical applications: a review. Int J Biol Macromol2017; 101: 254–272.
20.
GuptaBTummalapalliMDeopuraBL, et al. Preparation and characterization of in-situ crosslinked pectin-gelatin hydrogels.. Carbohydr Polym2014; 106: 312–318.
21.
AhmadianMKhoshfetratABKhatamiN, et al. Influence of gelatin and collagen incorporation on peroxidase-mediated injectable pectin-based hydrogel and bioactivity of fibroblasts. J Biomater Appl2021; 36: 179–190.
22.
FirouziNBaradar KhoshfetratAKazemiD. Enzymatically gellable gelatin improves nano-hydroxyapatite-alginate microcapsule characteristics for modular bone tissue formation. J Biomed Mater Res A2020; 108: 340–350.
23.
SakaiSHiroseKTaguchiK, et al. An injectable, in situ enzymatically gellable, gelatin derivative for drug delivery and tissue engineering. Biomaterials2009; 30: 3371–3377.
24.
SakaiSLiuYMatsuyamaT, et al. On-demand serum-degradable amylopectin-based in situ gellable hydrogel. J Mater Chem2012; 22: 1944–1949.
25.
NavaMMDraghiLGiordanoC, et al. The effect of scaffold pore size in cartilage tissue engineering. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater2016; 14: e223–e229.
26.
HanK-SSongJETripathyN, et al. Effect of pore sizes of silk scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Macromol Res2015; 23: 1091–1097.
27.
SinghSKDhyaniAJuyalD. Hydrogel: preparation, characterization and applications. Pharm Innov2017; 6: 25.
28.
KhatamiNKhoshfetratABKhaksarM, et al. Collagen-alginate-nano-silica microspheres improved the osteogenic potential of human osteoblast-like MG-63 cells. J Cell Biochem2019; 120: 15069–15082.
29.
WuLDingJ. Effects of porosity and pore size onin vitro degradation of three-dimensional porous poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) scaffolds for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A2005; 75A: 767–777.
30.
GhoshSBPhogatKBandyopadhyay-GhoshS. Injectable scaffolds for bone tissue repair and augmentation. In: Sultana N, Bandyopadhyay-Ghosh S and Soon CF (eds) Tissue engineering strategies for organ regeneration. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2020, pp.91–125.
31.
TakeiTSugiharaKYoshidaM, et al. Injectable and biodegradable sugar beet pectin/gelatin hydrogels for biomedical applications. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed2013; 24: 1333–1342.
32.
LohQLChoongC. Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: role of porosity and pore size. Tissue Eng Part B Rev2013; 19: 485–502.
33.
Khodabakhsh AghdamSKhoshfetratABRahbarghaziR, et al. Collagen modulates functional activity of hepatic cells inside alginate-galactosylated chitosan hydrogel microcapsules. Int J Biol Macromol2020; 156: 1270–1278.
34.
MurphyCMHaughMGO’BrienFJ. The effect of mean pore size on cell attachment, proliferation and migration in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials2010; 31: 461–466.
