A multiblock bioresorbable copolyester, poly(butylene/diethylene glycol succinate), was synthesized by reactive blending, and it was used, together with the corresponding poly(butylene succinate) homopolymer, to form films and to fabricate biomimetic electrospun scaffolds. The poly(butylene/diethylene glycol succinate) scaffold had a more pronounced elastomeric behavior than poly(butylene succinate). It also underwent hydrolytic degradation faster than poly(butylene succinate) since the incorporated diethylene glycol succinate units rendered the copolymer more hydrophilic than poly(butylene succinate). The films degraded faster than electrospun samples due to the autocatalytic effect of carboxylic end-groups. The biodegradable poly(butylene/diethylene glycol succinate) scaffold supported the growth and preserved the cardiac phenotype markers of H9c2 cells, demonstrating its potential utility in soft tissue engineering applications.
RehfeldtFEnglerAJEckhardtA. Cell responses to the mechanochemical microenvironment—implications for regenerative medicine and drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliver Rev2007; 59: 1329–1339.
2.
JawadHAliNNLyonAR. Myocardial tissue engineering: a review. J Tissue Eng Regen M2007; 1: 327–342.
3.
AmsdenB. Curable, biodegradable elastomers: emerging biomaterials for drug delivery and tissue engineering. Soft Matter2007; 3: 1335–1348.
4.
BlackJHastingsG. Handbook of biomaterial properties. London: Chapman and Hall, 1998.
5.
SerranoMCChungEJAmeerGA. Advances and applications of biodegradable elastomers in regenerative medicine. Adv Funct Mater2010; 20: 192–208.
6.
GuelcherSA. Biodegradable polyurethanes: synthesis and applications in regenerative medicine. Tissue Eng Pt B2008; 14: 3–17.
7.
YinDWangXHYanY. Preliminary studies on peripheral nerve regeneration using a new polyurethane conduit. J Bioact Compat Pol2007; 22: 143–159.
8.
PegoAPSiebumBLuynV. Preparation of degradable porous structures based on 1,3-trimethylene carbonate and d,l-lactide (co)polymers for heart tissue engineering. Tissue Eng2003; 9: 981–994.
9.
OzawaTMickleDAGWeiselRD. Optimal biomaterial for creation of autologous cardiac grafts. Circulation2002; 106: I176–I182.
10.
GuarinoVAlvarez-PerezMCirilloV. HMSC interaction with PCL and PCL/gelatin platforms: a comparative study on films and electrospun membranes. J Bioact Compat Polym2011; 26(2): 144–160.
MarchesePCelliAFioriniM. Influence of the activity of transesterification catalysts on the phase behavior of PC-PET blends. Macromol Chem and Physic2002; 203: 695–704.
13.
SoccioMLottiNFinelliL. Influence of transesterification reactions on the miscibility and thermal properties of poly(butylene/diethylene succinate) copolymers. Eur Polym J2008; 44: 1722–1732.
14.
SoccioMLottiNFinelliL. Miscibility of biodegradable poly(propylene succinate)/poly(propylene adipate) blends: effect of the transesterification reactions. Eur Polym J2009; 45: 3236–3248.
15.
FujimakiT. Processability and properties of aliphatic polyesters, “Bionolle,” synthesized by polycondensation reaction. Polym Degrad Stabil1998; 59: 209–214.
16.
XuJGuoB-H. Poly(butylene succinate) and its copolymers: research, development and industrialization. Biotechno J2010; 5: 1149–1163.
17.
LiHChangJCaoA. In vitro evaluation of biodegradable poly(butylene succinate) as a novel biomaterial. Macromol Biosci2005; 5: 433–440.
18.
OlivieraJTCorreloVMSolPC. Assessment of the suitability of chitosan/polybutylene succinate scaffolds seeded with mouse mesenchymal progenitor cells for a cartilage tissue engineering approach. Tissue Eng Pt A2008; 14: 1651–1661.
19.
HuangZ-MZhangYZRamakrishnaS. Electrospinning and mechanical characterization of gelatin nanofibers. Polymer2004; 45: 5361–5368.
20.
ForoniLDiraniGGualandiC. Paraffin embedding allows effective analysis of proliferation, survival and immunophenotyping of cells cultured on poly(l-lactic acid) electrospun nanofiber scaffolds. Tissue Eng Pt C2010; 16: 751–760.
21.
ChenMSChangSJChangRS. Copolyesters. I. Sequence distribution of poly(butylene terephthalate-co-adipate) copolyesters determined by 400 MHz NMR. J Appl Polym Sci1990; 40: 1053–1057.
22.
JiangGWuHGuoS. Reinforcement of adhesion and development of morphology at polymer—polymer interface via reactive compatibilization: a review. Polym Eng Sci2010; 50: 2273–2286.
23.
KhonakdarHAGolrizMJafariSH. Correlation of sequence block lengths and degree of randomness with melt rheological properties in PET/PEN blends. Macromol Mater Eng2009; 294: 272–280.
24.
MarchesePCelliAFioriniM. Relationships between the molecular architecture, crystallization capacity, and miscibility in poly(butylene terephthalate)/polycarbonate blends. J Polym Sci Pol Phys2004; 42: 2821–2832.
25.
PuppiDPirasAMDettaN. Poly(vinyl alcohol)-based electrospun meshes as potential candidate scaffolds in regenerative medicine. J Bioact Compat Pol2011; 26: 20–34.
BlackwoodKAMcKeanRCantonI. Development of biodegradable electrospun scaffolds for dermal replacement. Biomaterials2008; 29: 3091–3104.
28.
ZahediPRezaeianIRanaei-SiadatS-O. A review on wound dressings with an emphasis on electrospun nanofibrous polymeric bandages. Polym Advan Technol2010; 21: 77–95.
FocareteMLGualandiCScandolaM. Electrospun scaffolds of a polyhydroxyalkanoate consisting of ω-hydroxylpentadecanoate repeat units: fabrication and in vitro biocompatibility studies. J Biomat Sci-Polym E2010; 21: 1283–1296.
38.
ZhongXRanSFangD. Control of structure, morphology and property in electrospun poly(glycolide-co-lactide) non-woven membranes via post-draw treatments. Polymer2003; 44: 4959–4967.
39.
LiS. Hydrolytic degradation characteristics of aliphatic polyesters derived from lactic and glycolic acid. J Biomed Mater Res1999; 48: 342–353.
40.
VertMGarreauHMauditJ. Complexity of the hydrolytic degradation of aliphatic polyesters. Die Angew Makrom Chem1997; 247: 239–253.
41.
Von BurkersrodaFSchedlLGopferichA. Why degradable polymers undergo surface erosion or bulk erosion. Biomaterials2002; 23: 4221–4231.
42.
GopferichA. Mechanism of polymer degradation and erosion. Biomaterials1996; 17: 103–114.
43.
GarreauHGrizziIVertM. Hydrolytic degradation of devices based on poly(dl-lactic acid) size dependence. Biomaterials1995; 16: 305–311.
44.
HanXPanJ. Polymer chain scission, oligomer production and diffusion—a two scale model for degradation of bioresorbable polyesters. Acta Biomater2011; 7: 538–547.
45.
LuLGarciaCAMikosAG. In vitro degradation of thin poly(dl-lactic-co-glycolic acid) films. J Biomed Mater Res1999; 46: 236–244.
CuiWLiXYuG. Investigation of drug release and matrix degradation of electrospun poly(d,l-lactide) fibers with paracetanol inoculation. Biomacromolecules2006; 7: 1623–1629.
48.
ZongXRanSKimK-S. Structure and morphology changes during in vitro degradation of electrospun poly(glycolide-co-lactide) nanofiber membrane. Biomacromolecules2003; 4: 416–423.
49.
HeschelerJMeyerRPlantS. Morphological, biochemical, and electrophysiological characterization of a clonal cell (H9c2) line from rat heart. Circ Res1991; 69: 1476–1486.
