Myocardial infarction is one of the most prevalent diseases around the world. Cardiac tissue engineering is a new approach to repair and revive the structure and functionality of cardiac damaged tissue. In this study, gellan gum/reduced graphene oxide composite hydrogels were fabricated, characterized, and evaluated. The hydrogels were prepared using the solvent casting method and characterized via scanning electron microscopy and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. Compressive mechanical analysis, injectability as well as electrical conductivity test were run. Furthermore, water swelling and degradation analyses were conducted. MTT assay was performed using rat myoblasts (H9C2) to determine the cytotoxicity of our samples. Results showed that reduced graphene oxide fillers dispersed acceptably and enhanced the compressive modulus and electrical conductivity of gellan gum hydrogels. However, in this regard, compressive strength and ductility were not significantly boosted with reduced graphene oxide addition. The water-swelling ratio (%) rised in the presence of reduced graphene oxide, whereas the degradation rate was not significantly affected by them. Meanwhile, synthesized hydrogels showed suitable injectability. MTT assay results revealed that gellan gum hydrogels containing 1% and 2% reduced graphene oxide were not cytotoxic. According to the findings, gellan gum/2% reduced graphene oxide composite hydrogel can be a promising candidate for repairing and healing infarcted myocardial tissue.
MendisSPuskaPNorrvingB. Global atlas on cardiovascular disease prevention and control. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2011.
2.
SansSKestelootHKromhoutD. The burden of cardiovascular diseases mortality in Europe: Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology on Cardiovascular Mortality and Morbidity Statistics in Europe. Eur Heart J1997; 18(8): 1231–1248.
3.
MendisSThygesenKKuulasmaaK, et al. World Health Organization definition of myocardial infarction: 2008–09 revision. Int J Epidemiol2010; 40(1): 139–146.
4.
LeorJAmsalemYCohenS. Cells, scaffolds, and molecules for myocardial tissue engineering. Pharmacol Ther2005; 105(2): 151–163.
5.
RadhakrishnanJKrishnanUMSethuramanS. Hydrogel based injectable scaffolds for cardiac tissue regeneration. Biotechnol Adv2014; 32(2): 449–461.
6.
SingelynJMDeQuachJASeif-NaraghiSB, et al. Naturally derived myocardial matrix as an injectable scaffold for cardiac tissue engineering. Biomaterials2009; 30(29): 5409–5416.
7.
ChenQ-ZHardingSEAliNN, et al. Biomaterials in cardiac tissue engineering: ten years of research survey. Mater Sci Eng R Rep2008; 59: 1–37.
8.
PlotkinMVaibaviSRRufaihahAJ, et al. The effect of matrix stiffness of injectable hydrogels on the preservation of cardiac function after a heart attack. Biomaterials2014; 35(5): 1429–1438.
9.
SlaughterBVKhurshidSSFisherOZ, et al. Hydrogels in regenerative medicine. Adv Mater2009; 21(32–33): 3307–3329.
10.
WuKLiuYLCuiB, et al. Application of stem cells for cardiovascular grafts tissue engineering. Transpl Immunol2006; 16(1): 1–7.
11.
ChenQZBismarckAHansenU, et al. Characterisation of a soft elastomer poly (glycerol sebacate) designed to match the mechanical properties of myocardial tissue. Biomaterials2008; 29(1): 47–57.
12.
JabbariE. Hydrogels for cell delivery. Gels2018; 4: 58.
13.
LeeJH. Injectable hydrogels delivering therapeutic agents for disease treatment and tissue engineering. Biomater Res2018; 22(27): 1–14.
14.
SharmaDRossDWangG, et al. Upgrading prevascularization in tissue engineering: a review of strategies for promoting highly organized microvascular network formation. Acta Biomater2019; 95: 112–130.
15.
TousEPurcellBIfkovitsJL, et al. Injectable acellular hydrogels for cardiac repair. J Cardiovasc Transl Res2011; 4(5): 528–542.
16.
YueKTrujillo-de SantiagoGMoisés AlvarezM, et al. Synthesis, properties, and biomedical applications of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials2015; 73: 254–271.
17.
SperindeJJGriffithLG. Control and prediction of gelation kinetics in enzymatically cross-linked poly (ethylene glycol) hydrogels. Macromolecules2000; 33: 5476–5480.
18.
HovgaardLBrøndstedH. Dextran hydrogels for colon-specific drug delivery. J Control Release1995; 36(1-2): 159–166.
19.
HasanAKhattabAIslamMA, et al. Injectable hydrogels for cardiac tissue repair after myocardial infarction. Adv Sci (Weinh)2015; 2(11): 1500122.
20.
GehrkeSHUhdenLHMcBrideJF. Enhanced loading and activity retention of bioactive proteins in hydrogel delivery systems. J Control Release1998; 55(1): 21–33.
21.
PollockTJ. Gellan-related polysaccharides and the genusSphingomonas. J Gen Microbiol1993; 139: 1939–1945.
22.
MiyoshiETakayaTNishinariK. Rheological and thermal studies of gel-sol transition in gellan gum aqueous solutions. Carbohyd Polym1996; 30: 109–119.
23.
RinaudoM. Role of substituents on the properties of some polysaccharides. Biomacromolecules2004; 5(4): 1155–1165.
24.
MorrisERNishinariKRinaudoM. Gelation of gellan–a review. Food Hydrocoll2012; 28(2): 373–411.
25.
CoutinhoDFSantSVShinH, et al. Modified gellan gum hydrogels with tunable physical and mechanical properties. Biomaterials2010; 31(29): 7494–7502.
26.
SmithAMSheltonRMPerrieY, et al. An initial evaluation of gellan gum as a material for tissue engineering applications. J Biomater Appl2007; 22(3): 241–254.
27.
OliveiraJTMartinsLPicciochiR, et al. Gellan gum: a new biomaterial for cartilage tissue engineering applications. J Biomed Mater Res A2010; 93(3): 852–863.
28.
GongYWangCLaiRC, et al. An improved injectable polysaccharide hydrogel: modified gellan gum for long-term cartilage regeneration in vitro. J Mater Chem2009; 19(14): 1968–1977.
29.
LeeHFisherSKallosMS, et al. Optimizing gelling parameters of gellan gum for fibrocartilage tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater2011; 98(2): 238–245.
30.
WarrenHGatelyRDO’BrienP, et al. Electrical conductivity, impedance, and percolation behavior of carbon nanofiber and carbon nanotube containing gellan gum hydrogels. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys2014; 52(13): 864–871.
31.
WangJMuXSunM. The Thermal, electrical and thermoelectric properties of graphene nanomaterials. Nanomaterials2019; 9: 218.
32.
NovoselovKSGeimAKMorozovSV, et al. Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. Nature2005; 438: 197–200.
33.
KanayamaIMiyajiHTakitaH, et al. Comparative study of bioactivity of collagen scaffolds coated with graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide. Int J Nanomedicine2014; 9: 3363–3373.
34.
ChangYYangSTLiuJH, et al. In vitro toxicity evaluation of graphene oxide on A549 cells. Toxicol Lett2011; 200(3): 201–210.
35.
CilurzoFSelminFMinghettiP, et al. Injectability evaluation: an open issue. AAPS Pharmscitech2011; 12(2): 604–609.
36.
ShinSRZihlmannCAkbariM, et al. Reduced graphene oxide-gelMA hybrid hydrogels as scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering. Small2016; 12(27): 3677–3689.
37.
UnnithanARSasikalaARKParkCH, et al. A unique scaffold for bone tissue engineering: an osteogenic combination of graphene oxide–hyaluronic acid–chitosan with simvastatin. J Ind Eng Chem2017; 46: 182–191.
38.
WangYXiaoYGaoG, et al. Conductive graphene oxide hydrogels reduced and bridged by l-cysteine to support cell adhesion and growth. J Mater Chem B2017; 5: 511–516.
39.
NemirSWestJL. Synthetic materials in the study of cell response to substrate rigidity. Ann Biomed Eng2010; 38(1): 2–20.
40.
Jagur GrodzinskiJ. Polymeric gels and hydrogels for biomedical and pharmaceutical applications. Polym Adv Technol2010; 21: 27–47.
41.
FerrisCJGilmoreKJWallaceGG, et al. Modified gellan gum hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Soft Matter2013; 9(14): 3705–3711.
42.
WenHBennettEEpsteinN, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of myocardial elastic modulus and viscosity using displacement imaging and phase-contrast velocity mapping. Magn Reson Med2005; 54(3): 538–548.
43.
GhistaDNSandler HVayoWH. Elastic modulus of the human intact left ventricle-determination physiological interpretation. Med Biol Eng1975; 13: 151–161.
44.
EngelmayrGCJrChengMBettingerCJ, et al. Accordion-like honeycombs for tissue engineering of cardiac anisotropy. Nat Mater2008; 7: 1003–1010.
45.
FerrisCJPanhuisMIH. Conducting bio-materials based on gellan gum hydrogels. Soft Matter2009; 5(18): 3430–3437.
46.
KangDCaiZJinQ, et al. Bio-inspired composite films with integrative properties based on the self-assembly of gellan gum–graphene oxide crosslinked nanohybrid building blocks. Carbon2015; 91: 445–457.
47.
BalintRCassidyNJCartmellSH. Conductive polymers: towards a smart biomaterial for tissue engineering. Acta Biomater2014; 10(6): 2341–2353.
48.
DaiTQingXZhouH, et al. Mechanically strong conducting hydrogels with special double-network structure. Synth Met2010; 160(7-8): 791–796.
49.
TangQLinJWuJ, et al. Two-steps synthesis of a poly (acrylate–aniline) conducting hydrogel with an interpenetrated networks structure. Carbohydr Polym2007; 67(3): 332–336.
50.
TangQWuJLinJ. A multifunctional hydrogel with high conductivity, pH-responsive, thermo-responsive and release properties from polyacrylate/polyaniline hybrid. Carbohydr Polym2008; 73(2): 315–321.
51.
LiXZhouJLiuZ, et al. A PNIPAAm-based thermosensitive hydrogel containing SWCNTs for stem cell transplantation in myocardial repair. Biomaterials2014; 35(22): 5679–5688.
52.
MacDonaldRAVogeCMKariolisM, et al. Carbon nanotubes increase the electrical conductivity of fibroblast-seeded collagen hydrogels. Acta Biomater2008; 4(6): 1583–1592.
53.
MinJHPatelMKohWG. Incorporation of conductive materials into hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Polymers2018; 101078: 1–36.
54.
NandaSSPapaefthymiouGCYiDK. Functionalization of graphene oxide and its biomedical applications. Crit Rev Solid Sate2015; 40(5): 291–315.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
