Background: Administration of the Einstein Neonatal Neurobehavioral Assessment Scale (ENNAS) can be time-consuming, and items can be highly correlated. We aimed to determine: (1) its factor analytic structure; (2) the validity of the factor structure; and (3) the associations of physiologic measures with factor scores. Methods: A factor analysis reduced 21 ENNAS items into 5 factors in 57 congenital heart disease (CHD) and 35 healthy infants. Multiple linear regressions examined the association of factor scores with group, gestational age, and physiologic variables. Results: 5-factor solution: 1 (Orienting Reflex), 2 (Extensor Axial Tone), 3 (Primitive Reflexes), 4 (Flexor Tone), 5 (Reflexive Tone Around Extremity Joints). Moderate to strong evidence supported: face, discriminant, and construct validity of these factors, with Factor 2 having the strongest. Conclusions: Components of Factor 2 may provide similar information about neonatal development, thus reducing the time for and burden of administration for researchers and clinicians.
KurtzbergDVaughanHGJrDaumCGrellongBAAlbinSRotkinL. Neurobehavioral performance of low-birthweight infants at 40 weeks conceptional age: comparison with normal fullterm infants. Dev Med Child Neurol.1979;21(5):590-607.
2.
MajnemerARosenblattBRileyPS. Influence of gestational age, birth weight, and asphyxia on neonatal neurobehavioral performance. Pediatr Neurol.1993;9(3):181-186.
3.
LimperopoulosCMajnemerAShevellMIRosenblattBRohlicekCTchervenkovC. Neurologic status of newborns with congenital heart defects before open heart surgery. Pediatrics. 1999;103(2):402-408.
4.
LimperopoulosCMajnemerAShevellMIRosenblattBRohlicekCTchervenkovC. Neurodevelopmental status of newborns and infants with congenital heart defects before and after open heart surgery. J Pediatr.2000;137(5):638-645.
5.
TranNNKumarSRHodgeFSMaceyPM. Cerebral autoregulation in neonates with and without congenital heart disease. Am J Crit Care. 2018;27(5):410-416.
6.
TavakolMWetzelA. Factor analysis: a means for theory and instrument development in support of construct validity. Int J Med Educ. 2020;11:245-247.
LesterBMTronickEZBrazeltonTB. The neonatal intensive care unit network neurobehavioral scale procedures. Pediatrics. 2004;113(3 Pt 2):641-667.
9.
TranNNTranMPanigrahyABradyKMVotava-SmithJK. Association of cerebrovascular stability Index and head circumference between infants with and without congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol.2022.
10.
AlySAZurakowskiDGlassPSkurow-ToddKJonasRADonofrioMT. Cerebral tissue oxygenation index and lactate at 24 h postoperative predict survival and neurodevelopmental outcome after neonatal cardiac surgery. Congenit Heart Dis. 2017;12(2):188-195.
11.
HoffmanGMBrosigCLBearLMTweddellJSMussattoKA. Effect of intercurrent operation and cerebral oxygenation on developmental trajectory in congenital heart disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101(2):708-716.
12.
TranNNVotava-SmithJKWoodJC, et al.Cerebral oxygen saturation and cerebrovascular instability in newborn infants with congenital heart disease compared to healthy controls. PloS one. 2021;16(5):e0251255.
13.
Votava-SmithJKStatileCJTaylorMD, et al.Impaired cerebral autoregulation in preoperative newborn infants with congenital heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.2017;154(3):1038-1044.
14.
MebiusMJKooiEMWBilardoCMBosAF. Brain injury and neurodevelopmental outcome in congenital heart disease: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2017;140(1).
15.
WallaceIFRoseSAMcCartonCMKurtzbergDVaughanHGJr. Relations between infant neurobehavioral performance and cognitive outcome in very low birth weight preterm infants. J Dev Behav Pediatr.1995;16(5):309-317.
16.
MajnemerALimperopoulosCShevellMIRohlicekCRosenblattBTchervenkovC. A new look at outcomes of infants with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Neurol.2009;40(3):197-204.
17.
LimperopoulosCMajnemerARosenblattBShevellMIRohlicekCTchervenkovC. Agreement between the neonatal neurological examination and a standardized assessment of neurobehavioural performance in a group of high-risk newborns. Pediatr Rehabil.1997;1(1):9-14.
18.
de Winter*JCDodou*DWieringaPA. Exploratory factor analysis with small sample sizes. Multivariate Behav Res.2009;44(2):147-181.
19.
ComreyALLeeHB. A First Course in Factor Analysis. Psychology press; 2013.
20.
LenhardWLenhardA. Computation of effect sizes. Psychometrica. 2016.
21.
KushnerenkoEVVan den BerghBRHWinklerI. Separating acoustic deviance from novelty during the first year of life: a review of event-related potential evidence. Front Psychol.2013;4:595-595.
22.
PhilbinMKKlaasP. Hearing and behavioral responses to sound in full-term newborns. Journal of Perinatology: Official Journal of the California Perinatal Association. 2000;20(8 Pt 2):S68-S76.
23.
BasuAP. Early intervention after perinatal stroke: opportunities and challenges. Dev Med Child Neurol.2014;56(6):516-521.
24.
GruntS. Incidence and outcomes of symptomatic neonatal arterial ischemic stroke. Pediatrics. 2015;135, 10.1542/peds.2014-1520.
25.
SarnatH. Functions of the corticospinal and corticobulbar tracts in the human newborn. J Pediatr Neurol.2015;1(1):3-8.
26.
WesselJR. An adaptive orienting theory of error processing. Psychophysiology. 2018;55(3):e13041-n/a.
27.
Sara SusanJBouretS. Orienting and reorienting: the locus Coeruleus mediates cognition through arousal. Neuron (Cambridge, Mass). 2012;76(1):130-141.
28.
SokolovENNezlinaNIPolyanskiiVBEvtikhinDV. The orientating reflex: the “targeting reaction” and “searchlight of attention”. Neurosci Behav Physiol.2002;32(4):347-362.
29.
Hadders-AlgraM. Early human motor development: from variation to the ability to vary and adapt. Neurosci Biobehav Rev.2018;90:411-427.
30.
ForteAEEtardOReichenbachT. The human auditory brainstem response to running speech reveals a subcortical mechanism for selective attention. eLife. 2017;6.
31.
HawesJBernardoSWilsonD. The neonatal neurological examination: improving understanding and performance. Neonatal Netw. 2020;39(3):116-128.
32.
DubowitzLRicciwDMercuriE. The Dubowitz neurological examination of the full-term newborn. Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews. 2005;11(1):52-60.
33.
MajnemerASniderL. A comparison of developmental assessments of the newborn and young infant. Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews. 2005;11(1):68-73.
34.
GooMTuckerKJohnstonLM. Muscle tone assessments for children aged 0 to 12 years: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol.2018;60(7):660-671.
35.
DubowitzLRicciwDMercuriE. The Dubowitz neurological examination of the full-term newborn. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev.2005;11(1):52-60.
36.
AdolphKEFranchakJM. The development of motor behavior. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2017;8(1–2), 10.1002/wcs.1430.
37.
GurfinkelVCacciatoreTWCordoPHorakFNuttJSkossR. Postural muscle tone in the body axis of healthy humans. J Neurophysiol.2006;96(5):2678-2687.
38.
ZafeiriouDI. Primitive reflexes and postural reactions in the neurodevelopmental examination. Pediatr Neurol.2004;31(1):1-8.
39.
Neonatal Reflexes. In: Encyclopedia of Children's Health; 2021.
40.
StatPearls. In:2021.
41.
KatnerTLKasarskisEJ. Muscle Tone, Second Edition ed. Elsevier Inc; 2014:194-196.
42.
MorrisonI. Keep calm and cuddle on: social touch as a stress buffer. Adapt Human Behav Physiol.2016;2(4):344-362.
43.
EllingsenD-MLeknesSLøsethGWessbergJOlaussonH. The neurobiology shaping affective touch: expectation, motivation, and meaning in the multisensory context. Front Psychol.2015;6:1986-1986.
44.
ArdielELRankinCH. The importance of touch in development. Paediatr Child Health.2010;15(3):153-156.
45.
BelotR-ABouteloupMMariageACandilis-HuismanDMottetNMellierD. Relevance of neonatal behavior assessment scale for infants with somatic disorders: comparison on one matched group of control. Front Pediatr.2020;8:506384-506384.
46.
FutagiYToribeYSuzukiY. The grasp reflex and moro reflex in infants: hierarchy of primitive reflex responses. Int J Pediatr.2012;2012:191562.
47.
SinghalSBawaRBansalS. Comparison of Dubowitz scoring versus Ballard scoring for assessment of fetal maturation of newly born infants setting. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol.2017;6(7):3096.
48.
BallardJLKhouryJCWedigKWangLEilers-WalsmanBLLippR. New Ballard score, expanded to include extremely premature infants. J Pediatr.1991;119(3):417-423.
49.
The Ballard Score Maturational Assessment of Gestational Age in Newly Born Infants. Ballard Score. https://www.ballardscore.com/. Published 2019. Accessed.
50.
BoukydisCFBigsbyRLesterBM. Clinical use of the neonatal intensive care unit network neurobehavioral scale. Pediatrics. 2004;113(3 Pt 2):679-689.
51.
KellyCJMakropoulosACordero-GrandeL, et al.Impaired development of the cerebral cortex in infants with congenital heart disease is correlated to reduced cerebral oxygen delivery. Sci Rep.2017;7(1):15088.
52.
FarmaniaRSitaramanSDasRR. Goniometric assessment of muscle tone of preterm infants and impact of gestational age on its maturation in Indian setting. J Neurosci Rural Pract.2017;8(S 01):S044-S048.
53.
AllenMCCaputeAJ. Tone and reflex development before term. Pediatrics. 1990;85(3 Pt 2):393-399.
54.
HalliogluOGurerGBozluGKarpuzDMakharoblidzeKOkuyazC. Evaluation of neurodevelopment using Bayley-III in children with cyanotic or hemodynamically impaired congenital heart disease. Congenit Heart Dis. 2015;10(6):537-541.
55.
KhalilASuffNThilaganathanBHurrellACooperDCarvalhoJS. Brain abnormalities and neurodevelopmental delay in congenital heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology: the Official Journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014;43(1):14-24.
56.
OrtinauCMDBecaJMLambethJBS, et al.Regional alterations in cerebral growth exist preoperatively in infants with congenital heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.2012;143(6):1264-1270.e1262.
57.
PironkovaRPGiamelliJSeidenH, et al.Brain injury with systemic inflammation in newborns with congenital heart disease undergoing heart surgery. Exp Ther Med.2017;14(1):228-238.
58.
KussmanBDWypijDLaussenPC, et al.Relationship of intraoperative cerebral oxygen saturation to neurodevelopmental outcome and brain magnetic resonance imaging at 1 year of age in infants undergoing biventricular repair. Circulation. 2010;122(3):245-254.
59.
SimonsJSoodEDDerbyCDPizarroC. Predictive value of near-infrared spectroscopy on neurodevelopmental outcome after surgery for congenital heart disease in infancy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.2012;143(1):118-125.
60.
ZamaniGTajdiniMAshrafiMShajariHMehdizadehMDizajiZ. Impact of chronic hypoxia on neurodevelopment of children with cyanotic congenital heart disease. Journal of Iranian Medical Council. 2019;2(4):86-91.
61.
HasebaSSakakimaHNakaoS, et al.Early postoperative physical therapy for improving short-term gross motor outcome in infants with cyanotic and acyanotic congenital heart disease. Disabil Rehabil.2018;40(14):1694-1701.
62.
BarbosaMMoreiraJTronickEBeeghlyMFuertesM. Neonatal behavioral assessment scale (NBAS): confirmatory factor analysis of the six behavioral clusters. Early Hum Dev.2018;124:1-6.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
