Epilepsy affects over 500,000 children in North America of whom 30% have drug-resistant epilepsy. Advancements with neurotechnologies show promising benefits, but the perceptions of these procedures by youth is unknown.
Methods:
We conducted semistructured interviews with 10 youth in British Columbia, Canada who underwent procedures for drug-resistant epilepsy involving different forms of neurotechnology (subdural grids, vagus nerve stimulation, responsive neurostimulation). Interviews were analyzed using the constant comparative qualitative method.
Results:
Four major thematic categories emerged from the interviews. Treatment values, impact of the disorder, personal context, and impact of neurotechnology.
Conclusions:
Besides the predictable goal of seizure reduction, a desire for autonomy and the importance of trust in the medical team emerged as dominant values within the 4 thematic categories that were explicit to the use of new neurotechnologies for the management of drug-resistant epilepsy.
JonesJEAustinJKCaplanR, et al.Psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents who have epilepsy. Pediatr Rev. 2008;29:e9–e14.
2.
PrasadANSangXCorbettBA, et al.Prevalence of childhood epilepsy in Canada. Can J Neurol Sci. 2011;38:719–722.
3.
BakerGASpectorSMcgrathYSoteriouH. Impact of epilepsy in adolescence: a UK controlled study. Epilepsy Behav. 2005;6:556–562.
4.
MillerVPalermoTMGreweSD. Quality of life in pediatric epilepsy: demographic and disease-related predictors and comparison with healthy controls. Epilepsy Behav. 2003;4:36–42.
5.
MacLeodJSAustinJK. Stigma in the lives of adolescents with epilepsy: a review of the literature. Epilepsy Behav. 2003;4:112–117.
6.
RussSALarsonKHalfonN. A national profile of childhood epilepsy and seizure disorder. Pediatrics. 2012;129:256–264.
7.
CamfieldCSCamfieldPR. Long-term social outcomes for children with epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2007;48:3–5.
8.
EssueBMHackettMLMuhunthanJ, et al.The economic impact of epilepsy: a systematic review. BMC Neurol. 2015;15:24
9.
KwanPBrodieMJ. Early identification of refractory epilepsy. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(5):314–319.
10.
MuhCR. Current and emerging surgical therapies for severe pediatric epilepsies. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2016;23:143–150.
11.
TitusJB. Health-related quality of life before and after pediatric epilepsy surgery: the influence of seizure outcome on changes in physical functioning and social functioning. Epilepsy Behav. 2013;27:477–483.
12.
HannanSCrossJHScottRCHarknessWHeymanI. The effects of epilepsy surgery on emotions, behavior, and psychosocial impairment in children and adolescents with drug-resistant epilepsy: a prospective study. Epilepsy Behav. 2009;15:318–324.
13.
HaderWJTellez-ZentenoJMetcalfeA, et al.Compilations of epilepsy surgery: a systematic review of focal surgical resections and invasive EEG monitoring. Epilepsia. 2013;54:840–847.
14.
LinYWangY. Neurostimulation as a promising epilepsy therapy. Epilepsia. 2017;2:371–387.
15.
StarnesKMillerKWong-KisielLLundstromBN. A review of neurostimulation for epilepsy in pediatrics. Brain Sci. 2019;9:283.
16.
United Nations General Assembly. 1989. Convention on the Rights of the Child. United Nations, Treaty Series 1577: no. 3.
17.
CoyneI. Consultation with children in hospital: children, parents’ and nurses’ perspectives. J Clin Nurs. 2016;15:61–71.
18.
LambertVGlackenMMcCarronM. “Visible-ness”: the nature of communication for children admitted to a specialist children’s hospital in the Republic of Ireland. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17:3092–3102.
19.
CoyneIAmoryAKiernanGGibsonF. Children’s participation in shared decision-making: children, adolescents, parents and healthcare professionals’ perspectives and experiences. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2014;18:273–280.
20.
HaggerL. Child as Vulnerable Patient: Protection and Empowerment. London, England: Routledge; 2019.
21.
BolandLGrahamILegareF., et al.Barriers and facilitators of pediatric shared decision-making: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2019;14:7.
22.
KwanPArzimanoglouABergAT, et al.Definition of drug resistant epilepsy: consensus proposal by the ad hoc Task Force of the ILAE Commission on Therapeutic Strategies [published correction appears in Epilepsia. 2010 Sep;51(9):1922]. Epilepsia. 2010;51(6):1069–1077.
23.
BazeleyPJacksonK. Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo. London, England: Sage.
24.
BachQUlrich-WilhelmTMüllerS. Parents’ and children’s decision-making and experiences in pediatric epilepsy surgery. Epilepsy Behav. 2020;107:107078.
25.
McDonaldPJHrincuVConnollyMUdwadiaFIllesJ. Caregiver perspectives on neurotechnology for drug resistant epilepsy. J Neurol. In preparation.
26.
ElliottIMLachLSmithML. I just want to be normal: a qualitative study exploring how children and adolescents view the impact of intractable epilepsy on their quality of life. Epilepsy Behav. 2005;7:664–678.
27.
PrusNGrantAC. Patient beliefs about epilepsy and brain surgery in a multicultural urban population. Epilepsy Behav. 2010;17:46–49.
28.
GilbertFCookMO’BrienTIllesJ. Embodiment and estrangement: results from a first-in-human “intelligent BCI” trial. Sci Eng Ethics. 2019;25:83–96.
