SiegelRLMillerKDJemalA. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):7–30.
2.
KasivisvanathanVRannikkoASBorghiM, et al.MRI-Targeted or standard biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(19):1767–1777.
3.
AhdootMWilburARReeseSE, et al.MRI-targeted, systematic, and combined biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(10):917–928.
4.
WeinrebJCBarentszJOChoykePL, et al.PI-RADS prostate imaging—reporting and data system: 2015, version 2. Eur Urol. 2016;69(1):16–40.
5.
RosenkrantzABGinocchioLACornfeldD, et al.Interobserver reproducibility of the PI-RADS version 2 lexicon: a multicenter study of six experienced prostate radiologists. Radiology. 2016;280(3):793–804.
6.
WestphalenACMcCullochCEAnaokarJM, et al.Variability of the positive predictive value of PI-RADS for prostate MRI across 26 centers: experience of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Prostate Cancer Disease-Focused Panel. Radiology. 2020;296(1):76–84.
7.
SackettJShihJHReeseSE, et al.Quality of prostate MRI: is the PI-RADS standard sufficient?Acad Radiol. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2020.01.031.
8.
RosenkrantzABAyoolaAHoffmanD, et al.The learning curve in prostate MRI interpretation: self-directed learning versus continual reader feedback. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208(3):W92–W100.
9.
TurkbeyBRosenkrantzABHaiderMA, et al.Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1: 2019 update of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2. Eur Urol. 2019;76(3):340–351.
10.
SchelbPKohlSRadtkeJP, et al.Classification of cancer at prostate MRI: deep learning versus clinical PI-RADS assessment. Radiology. 2019;293(3):607–617.
11.
SanfordTHarmonSATurkbeyEB, et al.Deep-learning-based artificial intelligence for PI-RADS classification to assist multiparametric prostate MRI interpretation: a development study. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020. doi:10.1002/jmri.27204.
