The long-term success of cardiac rehabilitation programs rests in part on the patient’s ability to maintain health behaviors, which is influence by the patient education received. Therefore, a short and reliable tool to assess patients' knowledge is warranted. The aim of this study was to translate, culturally-adapt and psychometrically validate the French-Canadian version of the Coronary Artery Disease Education Questionnaire Short Version (CADE-Q SV).
Methods
The French CADE-Q SV – translated and culturally-adapted - was reviewed by 3 bilingual experts in cardiovascular disease. This version was then psychometrically tested in 115 CR patients in two Canadian provinces (Québec and New Brunswick). The questionnaire was completed at patients’ first CR session and in the end of their 6-month program to assess interpretability. The internal consistency was assessed using Kuder-Richardson-20 (KR-20) and Cronbach's alpha, factor structure using confirmatory factor analysis, and criterion validity regarding level of education and family income.
Results
KR-20 was 0.72. Factor analysis revealed 5 factors, all internally consistent. Criterion validity was supported by significant differences in total scores by educational level and family income (p < 0.05). Results showed that increases in knowledge can moderately increase mean steps per day and peakVO2, with an MCID of 3.00. The overall mean was 15.7 ± 2.0. The area with the highest knowledge was risk factors and the lowest was psychosocial risk.
Conclusion
The French-Canadian CADE-SV was demonstrated to have good validity and reliability.
AldcroftS. A.TaylorN. F.BlackstockF. C.O’HalloranP. D. (2011).
Psychoeducational rehabilitation for health behavior change in coronary artery disease. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention,
31(5), 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1097/hcr.0b013e318220a7c9
2.
Anderson, L., & Taylor, R. S. (2014). Cardiac rehabilitation for people with heart disease: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2014(12), CD011273. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011273.pub2
3.
AndersonL.OldridgeN.ThompsonD. R.ZwislerA.-D.ReesK.MartinN.TaylorR. S. (2016).
Exercise-Based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology,
67(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.044
4.
AndersonL.TaylorR. S. (2014).
Cardiac rehabilitation for people with heart disease: An overview of Cochrane systematic reviews. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,
12. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd011273.pub2
5.
BarrettB.BrownD.MundtM.BrownR. (2005).
Sufficiently important difference: Expanding the framework of clinical significance. Medical Decision Making: An International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making,
25(3), 250–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x05276863
6.
Benjamin, E. J., Muntner, P., Alonso, A., Bittencourt, M. S., Callaway, C. W., Carson, A. P., Chamberlain, A. M., Chang, A. R., Cheng, S., Das, S. R., Delling, F. N., Djousse, L., Elkind, M., Ferguson, J. F., Fornage, M., Jordan, L. C., Khan, S. S., Kissela, B. M., Knutson, K. L., Kwan, T. W., … American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee (2019). Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation, 139(10), e56–e528. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659
7.
ClarkA. M.HaykowskyM.KryworuchkoJ.MacClureT.ScottJ.DesMeulesM.LuoW.LiangY.McAlisterF. A. (2010).
A meta-analysis of randomized control trials of home-based secondary prevention programs for coronary artery disease. European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation: Official Journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology,
17(3), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1097/hjr.0b013e32833090ef
8.
CohenJ. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.
Taylor & Francis.
9.
DaviesE. J.MoxhamT.ReesK.SinghS.CoatsA. J. S.EbrahimS.LoughF.TaylorR. S. (2010).
Exercise training for systolic heart failure: Cochrane systematic review and Meta-analysis. European Journal of Heart Failure,
12(7), 706–715. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjhf/hfq056
10.
GhisiG. L. de M.OhP.ThomasS.BenettiM. (2013).
Development and validation of an English version of the coronary artery disease education questionnaire (CADE‐Q). European Journal of Preventive Cardiology,
20(2), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487312437061
11.
DusseldorpE.van ElderenT.MaesS.MeulmanJ.KraaijV. (1999).
A meta-analysis of psychoeducational programs for coronary heart disease patients. Health Psychology,
18(5), 506–519. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.18.5.506
12.
GhisiG. L. de M.AbdallahF.GraceS. L.ThomasS.OhP. (2014).
A systematic review of patient education in cardiac patients: Do they increase knowledge and promote health behavior change?Patient Education and Counseling,
95(2), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.01.012
13.
GhisiG. L. de M.ChavesG. S. S.LouresJ. B.BonfimG. M.BrittoR. (2018).
Validation of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of a short questionnaire to assess knowledge in cardiovascular disease patients (CADE-Q SV). Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia,
111(6), 841–849. https://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20180169
14.
GhisiG. L. de M.SandisonN.OhP. (2016).
Development, pilot testing and psychometric validation of a short version of the coronary artery disease education questionnaire: The CADE-Q SV. Patient Education and Counseling,
99(3), 443–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.11.002
15.
Ghisi, G., Chaves, G., Ribeiro, A. L., Oh, P., Britto, R. R., & Grace, S. L. (2020). Comprehensive Cardiac Rehabilitation Effectiveness in a Middle-Income Setting: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL. Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention, 40(6), 399–406. https://doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0000000000000512
16.
GraceS. L.PoirierP.NorrisC. M.OakesG. H.SomanaderD. S.SuskinN. (2014).
Pan-Canadian development of cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention quality indicators. The Canadian Journal of Cardiology,
30(8), 945–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2014.04.003
17.
GuilleminF.BombardierC.BeatonD. (1993).
Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,
46(12), 1417–1432. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-n
18.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2013). Multivariate data analysis.
Pearson Education Limited.
19.
JohnstonB. C.EbrahimS.Carrasco-LabraA.FurukawaT. A.PatrickD. L.CrawfordM. W.HemmelgarnB. R.SchunemannH. J.GuyattG. H.NesrallahG. (2015).
Minimally important difference estimates and methods: A protocol. BMJ Open,
5(10), e007953. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007953
20.
JourdainP.JuillièreY. (2011).
Therapeutic education in patients with chronic heart failure: Proposal for a multiprofessional structured programme, by a French task force under the auspices of the French Society of Cardiology. Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases,
104(3), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acvd.2010.12.003
21.
KaiserH. F. (1960).
The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement,
20(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116
22.
MokkinkL. B.TerweeC. B.PatrickD. L.AlonsoJ.StratfordP. W.KnolD. L.BouterL. M.de VetH. C. W. (2010).
The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation,
19(4), 539–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8
23.
MullenP. D.MainsD. A.VelezR. (1992).
A meta-analysis of controlled trials of cardiac patient education. Patient Education and Counseling,
19(2), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0738-3991(92)90194-n
24.
PettM. A.LackeyN. R.SullivanJ. J. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research.
SAGE Publications.
25.
PiepoliM. F.CorràU.AdamopoulosS.BenzerW.Bjarnason-WehrensB.CupplesM.DendaleP.DohertyP.GaitaD.HöferS.McGeeH.MendesM.NiebauerJ.PogosovaN.Garcia-PorreroE.RauchB.SchmidJ. P.GiannuzziP. (2014).
Secondary prevention in the clinical management of patients with cardiovascular diseases. Core components, standards and outcome measures for referral and delivery. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology,
21(6), 664–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487312449597
26.
RothG. A.JohnsonC.AbajobirA.Abd-AllahF.AberaS. F.AbyuG.AhmedM.AksutB.AlamT.AlamK.AllaF.Alvis-GuzmanN.AmrockS.AnsariH.ÄrnlövJ.AsayeshH.AteyT. M.Avila-BurgosL.AwasthiA., . . . MurrayC. (2017).
Global, regional, and national burden of cardiovascular diseases for 10 causes, 1990 to 2015. Journal of the American College of Cardiology,
70(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04.052
27.
ShieldsG. E.WellsA.DohertyP.HeagertyA.BuckD.DaviesL. M. (2018).
Cost-effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation: A systematic review. Heart (British Cardiac Society),
104(17), 1403–1410. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312809
28.
Turk-Adawi, K. I., & Grace, S. L. (2015). Narrative review comparing the benefits of and participation in cardiac rehabilitation in high-, middle- and low-income countries. Heart, lung & circulation, 24(5), 510–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2014.11.013
29.
Thomas, R. J., King, M., Lui, K., Oldridge, N., Piña, I. L., Spertus, J., & American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation/American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Cardiac Rehabilitation/Secondary Prevention Performance Measures Writing Committee (2007). AACVPR/ACC/AHA 2007 performance measures on cardiac rehabilitation for referral to and delivery of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention services. Circulation, 116(14), 1611–1642. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.185734
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
