Quality assurance and quality enhancement processes in nursing education are vital to the establishment of a strong program. Existing quality assurance methods in nursing education such as professional self-regulation and external examination rely on provincial and national nursing associations for evaluation, putting minimal responsibility and accountability on internal program examiners. Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge provide a framework as outlined by Land that utilizes internal examiners from both student and faculty groups and represents an alternative to traditional quality assurance in nursing education.
Purpose
To identify troublesome mental health nursing content in a nursing curriculum by exploring students and faculty perspectives.
Method
A sequential mixed methods design that utilized surveys and focus groups to explore student and faculty perspectives on troublesome mental health nursing content.
Results
The project data were able to be organized into five main content themes that were identified as being troublesome: the spectrum of mental illness, therapeutic relationships and boundaries, praxis, professionalism in nursing, and brain chemistry and its management.
Conclusion
The findings from this project are unique to the program of review but show the potential of this new approach to quality assurance and program enhancement initiatives in nursing education.
BeggM.GaleaS.BayerR.WalkerJ.FriedL. (2014) MPH education for the 21st century: Design of Columbia University’s new public health curriculum. American Journal of Public Health104(1): 30–36.
2.
BostwickLLindenL. (2016) Evaluation criteria for nursing student application of evidence-based practice: A delphi study. Journal of Nursing Education55(6): 336–341.
3.
BrymanA. (2012) Social research methods, 4th ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
CavanaughS. (2014) Emphasizing mental health in nursing education. Canadian Nurse110(4): 26–28.
7.
ClearyM.HorsfallJ.JacksonD. (2013) Teaching mental health nursing is, at the very least, a craft, an art, and a science. Issues in Mental Health Nursing34(2): 136–137.
8.
CreswellJ. (2003) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
CreswellJ. (2009) Mixed methods procedures. In: CreswellJ. (ed.) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 203–226.
HappelB.WynadenD.TohotoaJ.Plantania-PhungC.ByrneL.MartinG.HarrisS. (2015) Mental health lived experience academics in tertiary education: The views of nurse academics. Nurse Education Today35(1): 113–117.
12.
HillS. (2010) Troublesome knowledge: Why don’t they understand?Health Information and Libraries Journal27(1): 80–83.
13.
IrvineN.CarmichaelP. (2009) Threshold concepts: A point of focus for practitioner research. Active Learning in Higher Education10(2): 103–119.
14.
KennedyR.RiquierC.SharpB. (1996) Practical applications of correspondence analysis to categorical data in market research. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing5(1): 56–70.
15.
LandR. (2011) There could be trouble ahead: Using threshold concepts as a tool of analysis. International Journal for Academic Development16(2): 175–178.
16.
LantzB. (2013) Equidistance of likert-type scales and validation of inferential methods using experiments and simulations. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods11(1): 16–28.
17.
LeeJ.SoutarG. (2010) Is Schwartz’s value survey an interval scale, and does it really matter?Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology41(1): 76–86.
18.
LucasU.MladenovicR. (2007) The potential of threshold concepts: An emerging framework for educational research and practice. London Review of Education5(1): 237–248.
19.
McAllisterM. (2007) New models of care in mental health. Australian Nursing Journal14(8): 37–38.
20.
McCannT.MoxhamL.FarrellG.UsherK.CrookesP. (2010) Mental health content of Australian pre-registration nursing curricula: Summary report and critical commentary. Nurse Education Today5(1): 393–397.
21.
Mental Health Commission of Canada (2012) Changing directions, changing directions: The Mental Health Strategy for Canada, Ottawa, ON: National Library of Canada.
22.
MeloK.WilliamsB.RossC. (2010) The impact of nursing curricula on clinical practice anxiety. Nursing Education Today30(1): 773–778.
23.
MeyerJ.LandR. (2003) Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practicing within the disciplines. In: RustC. (ed.) Improving student learning theory and practice – 10 years on, Oxford, England: OCSLD, pp. 412–424.
24.
MeyerJ.LandR. (2005) Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education49: 373–388.
25.
MeyerJ.LandR. (2006) Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: An introduction. In: MeyerJ. H. F.LandR. (eds) Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge, London, England: RoutledgeFalmer, pp. 3–18.
26.
MorganD. (2007) Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research1(1): 48–76.
27.
MorrissetteP.Doty-SweetnamK. (2010) Safeguarding student well-being: establishing a respectful learning environment in undergraduate psychiatric/mental health education. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing17(1): 519–527.
28.
Morse, J. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40(1), 120–123.
29.
MorseJ.NiehausL. (2009) Mixed methods design: Principles and procedures, Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
30.
Mundy, J & Dickinson, D. Factors affecting the uptake of voluntary HIV/AIDS counselling and testing (VCT) services in the workplace. In: HIV/AIDS in the Workplace Research Symposium. University of Witwatersrand, June 2004. pp. 175–193.
31.
O’DonnellH.GormleyK. (2013) Service user involvement in nurse education: perceptions of mental health nursing students. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing20(1): 193–202.
32.
PerkinsD. (1999) The many faces of constructivism. Educational Leadership57(1): 6–11.
33.
PerkinsD. (2006) Constructivism and troublesome knowledge. In: Overcoming barriers to student learning: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge, London, England: Routledge, pp. 33–47.
34.
RossC.MahalK.ChinnapenY.RanaR. (2013) The effects of clinical placement on students’ confidence in the mental health competencies. Nursing Education Perspectives34(4): 267–269.
35.
Ryan, P. (2015). Quality assurance in higher education: A review of literature. Higher Learning Research Communications, 5(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v5i4.257.
36.
SiddiquiN.FitzgeraldJ. (2014) Elaborated integration of qualitative and quantitative perspectives in mixed methods research: A profound enquiry into the nursing practice environment. International Journal of Multiple Research Methods8(2): 137–147.
37.
StickleyT.StaceyG.PollockK.SmithA.BetinisJ.FairbankS. (2010) The practice assessment of student nurses by people who use mental health services. Nurse Education Today30(1): 20–25.
38.
TeddlieC.TashakkoriA. (2009) Foundations of mixed methods research. Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
van de MortelT.BirdJ.HoltJ.WaloM. (2012) Quality assurance and quality enhancement of the nursing curriculum – Happy marriage or recipe for divorce?Journal of Nursing Education and Practice2(3): 110–119.
40.
WalkerG. (2013) A cognitive approach to threshold concepts. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning65(2): 247–263.
41.
WarelowP.EdwardK. (2009) Australian nursing curricula and mental health recruitment. International Journal of Nursing Practice15(1): 250–256.
