Private funding and private hospital provision play a key role in Australian healthcare. However, this role is inherently inequitable, creating a two-speed health system. Canada should avoid expanding private involvement in paying for healthcare.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Health Expenditure Australia 2018-19. Cat no. HWE 80. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2020.
2.
KiilAHoulbergK. How does copayment for health care services affect demand, health and redistribution? A systematic review of the empirical evidence from 1990 to 2011. Eur J Health Econ. 2014;15(8):813–828.
3.
NymanJA. American health policy: cracks in the foundation. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2007;32(5):759–783.
4.
NewhouseJP, the Health Insurance Experiment Group. Free For All? Lessons from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment. Harvard University Press; 1993.
5.
NewhouseJPSinaikoAD. What we know and don’t know about the effects of cost sharing of the demand for medical care - and so what? In: SloanFAKasperH, eds. Incentives and Choice in Health Care. MIT Press; 2008:85–102.
6.
EvansRG.Going for the gold: the redistributive agenda behind market-based health care reform. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1997;22(2):427–465.
7.
EvansRGBarerMLStoddartGL. User fees for health care: Why a bad idea keeps coming back (or, what’s health got to do with it?). In: BarerMLStoddartgLMcGrailKMMcLeodCB, eds. An Undisciplined Economist. Robert G. Evans on Health Economics, Health Care Policy, and Population Health. McGill-Queen’s University Press; 2016:154–191.
8.
EvansRGBarerMLStoddartGL. User fees for health care: why a bad idea keeps coming back (or, what’s health got to do with it?). Can J Aging. 1995;14(2):360–390.
9.
HabibovNCheungA.Revisiting informal payments in 29 transitional countries: the scale and socio-economic correlates. Soc Sci Med. 2017;178:28–37.
10.
KankeuHTVentelouB.Socioeconomic inequalities in informal payments for health care: an assessment of the ‘Robin Hood’ hypothesis in 33 African countries. Soc Sci Med. 2016;151:173–186.
11.
DotyMMTikkanenRSFitzGeraldMFieldsKWilliamsRD. Income-related inequality in affordability and access to primary care in eleven high-income countries: study reports survey results on health status, socioeconomic risk factors, affordability, and access to primary care among adults in the US and ten other high-income countries. Health Affairs. 2021;40(1):113–120.
12.
ElshaugAChalmersKBadgery-ParkerT.Measuring Low-Value Services in Private Health Insurance Data: 2015/16 – 2016/17. Sustainable Health System Solutions Pty Ltd; 2018.
13.
Badgery-ParkerTPearsonSAChalmersK, et al.Low-value care in Australian public hospitals: prevalence and trends over time. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019;28(3):205–214.
14.
FärdowJBroströmLJohanssonM.Co-payment for unfunded additional care in publicly funded health care systems: ethical issues. J Bioeth Inq. 2019;16(4):515–524.
15.
EllisRSavageE. Run for cover now or later? The impact of premiums, threats and deadlines on private health insurance in Australia. Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2008;8(4):257–277.
16.
HorodnicAVWilliamsCC. Informal payments by patients for health services: prevalence and determinants. Ser Ind J. 2018;38(11-12):841–855.
17.
WilliamsCCHorodnicAV. Rethinking informal payments by patients in Europe: an institutional approach. Health Policy. 2017;121(10):1053–1062.
18.
FloodCMThomasBWhiteK. The courts and two-tier Medicare. Healthc Policy. 2020;15(4):13–20.
19.
HoustonCS.Steps on the Road to Medicare: Why Saskatchewan Led the Way. McGill-Queen’s University Press; 2002.
20.
DuckettSNemetK.The History and Purposes of Private Health Insurance. Grattan Institute; 2019.
21.
ScottonRBMacdonaldCR. The making of Medibank. Sydney: School of Health Services Management. University of NSW; 1993:320.
22.
BoxallAMGillespieJA. Making Medicare: The Politics of Universal Health Care in Australia. NewSouth Publishing; 2013.
23.
WhaleyC. The association between provider price and complication rates for outpatient surgical services. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33(8):1352–1358.
24.
WealeAClarkS. Co-payments in the NHS: an analysis of the normative arguments. Health Econ Policy Law. 2010;5(2):225–246.
25.
ChengTCJoyceCMScottA. An empirical analysis of public and private medical practice in Australia. Health Policy. 2013;111(1):43–51.
26.
ChengTCKalbGScottA. Public Private or Both?: Analysing Factors Influencing the Labour Supply of Medical Specialists. Melbourne Institute; 2013. Report No.: 9780734043344 0734043341 Contract No.: 13.
27.
HurleyJ.Borders, fences, and crossings: regulating parallel private finance in health care. In: FloodCMThomasB, eds. Is Two-Tier Health Care the Future?University of Ottawa Press; 2020:69–91.
28.
DuckettSJ. Private care and public waiting. Aust Health Rev. 2005;29(1):87–93.
29.
DuckettS.Coercing, subsidising and encouraging: two decades of support for private health insurance. In: CahillDTonerP, eds. Wrong Way: How Privatisation and Economic Reform Backfired. La Trobe University Press in conjunction with Black Inc; 2018:40–58.
30.
TuohyCHFloodCMStabileM. How does private finance affect public health care systems? Marshaling the evidence from OECD nations. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2004;29(3):359–396.
31.
BichayN.Health insurance as a state institution: the effect of single-payer insurance on expenditures in OECD countries. Soc Sci Med. 2020;265:113454.
32.
BodasMPelegK. Self-isolation compliance in the COVID-19 era influenced by compensation: findings from a recent survey in Israel: public attitudes toward the COVID-19 outbreak and self-isolation: a cross sectional study of the adult population of Israel. Health Aff. 2020;39(6):936–941.
