The Emotional Regulation Related to Testing Scale (ERT Scale) assesses strategies students use to regulate emotion related to academic testing. It has four dimensions: Cognitive Appraising Processes (CAP), Emotion-Focusing Processes (EFP), Task-Focusing Processes (TFP), and Regaining Task-Focusing Processes (RTFP). The study examined the factor structure of each dimension and the incremental validity of the ERT subscales (N = 213 undergraduates). Confirmatory factor analysis indicated good fit for CAP and EFP dimensions. TFP and RTFP models had poor fit. The TFP dimension appears to involve a two-factor structure, which may account for why it has been observed to have low internal consistency reliability across studies. Subscales of CAP and EFP dimensions resulted in statistically significant increments in R2 after accounting for self-efficacy for learning and metacognitive self-regulation of learning. The TFP dimension and RTFP subscales did not exhibit incremental validity. The importance of assessing self-regulation of emotion and learning is emphasized.
AustinE. J.SaklofskeD. H.MastorasS. M. (2010). Emotional intelligence, coping and exam-related stress in Canadian undergraduate students. Australian Journal of Psychology, 62, 42-50. doi:10.1080/00049530903312899
2.
BjorkR. A.DunloskyJ.KornellN. (2013). Self-regulated learning: Beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 417-444. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823
3.
BrownS. D.NelsonT. L. (1983). Beyond the uniformity myth: A comparison of academically successful and unsuccessful test-anxious college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30, 367-374. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.30.3.367
4.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
7.
CovingtonM. V.OmelichC. L. (1987). “I knew it cold before the exam”: A test of the anxiety-blockage hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 393-400. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.79.4.393
8.
CredéM.PhillipsL. (2011). A meta-analytic review of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 337-346. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.03.002
9.
DavisH. A.DiStefanoC.SchutzP. A. (2008). Identifying patterns of appraising tests in first-year college students: Implications for anxiety and emotion regulation during test taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 942-960. doi:10.1037/a0013096
10.
DeCuir-GunbyJ. T.AultmanL.SchutzP. A. (2009). Investigating transactions among motives, emotional regulation related to testing, and test emotions. Journal of Experimental Education, 77, 409-436. doi:10.3200/JEXE.77.4.409-438
11.
DerakshanN.EysenckM. W. (2009). Anxiety, processing efficiency, and cognitive performance: New developments from attentional control theory. European Psychologist, 14, 168-176. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.14.2.168
12.
DeStenoD.GrossJ. J.KubzanskyL. (2013). Affective science and health: The importance of emotion and emotion regulation. Health Psychology, 32, 474-486. doi:10.1037/a0030259
13.
FolkmanS.LazarusR. S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 150-170. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.1.150
14.
GrossJ. J. (2013). Emotion regulation: Taking stock and moving forward. Emotion, 13, 359-365. doi:10.1037/a0032135
15.
GrossJ. J.ThompsonR. A. (2007). Emotion regulation: Conceptual foundations. In GrossJ. J. (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 3-24). New York, NY: Guilford.
16.
HarmsP. D.CredéM. (2010). Remaining issues in emotional intelligence research: Construct overlap, method artifacts, and lack of incremental validity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3, 154-158. doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01217.x
17.
HaytonJ. C.AllenD. G.ScarpelloV. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 191-205. doi:10.1177/1094428104263675
18.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
19.
LoweP. A. (2015). Should test anxiety be measured differently for males and females? Examination of measurement bias across gender on measures of test anxiety for middle and high school, and college students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 0734282914549428, first published on September17, 2014.
20.
McCabeJ. (2011). Metacognitive awareness of learning strategies in undergraduates. Memory & Cognition, 39, 462-476. doi:10.3758/s13421-010-0035-2
21.
McCraeR. R.KurtzJ. E.YamagataS.TerraccianoA. (2011). Internal consistency, retest reliability, and their implications for personality scale validity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 28-50. doi:10.1177/1088868310366253
22.
MiyakeA.FriedmanN. P.EmersonM. J.WitzkiA. H.HowerterA. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49-100. doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
23.
Naveh-BenjaminM.McKeachieW. J.LinY. (1987). Two types of test-anxious students: Support for an information processing model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 131-136. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.79.2.131
24.
NelsonJ. M.LindstromW.FoelsP. A. (2014). Test anxiety and college students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 32, 548-557. doi:10.1177/0734282914521978
25.
O’ConnorM. C.PaunonenS. V. (2007). Big five personality predictors of post-secondary academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 971-990. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.03.017
26.
PaunonenS. V.AshtonM. C. (2001). Big five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 524-539. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.3.524
27.
PetridesK. V.Pérez-GonzálezJ.FurnhamA. (2007). On the criterion and incremental validity of trait emotional intelligence. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 26-55. doi:10.1080/02699930601038912
28.
PintrichP. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385-407.
29.
PintrichP. R.SmithD. A.GarciaT.McKeachieW. J. (1991). The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
30.
PintrichP. R.SmithD. A.GarciaT.McKeachieW. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801-813. doi:10.1177/0013164493053003024
31.
RichardsonM.AbrahamC.BondR. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 353-387. doi:10.1037/a0026838
32.
RobbinsS. B.AllenJ.CasillasA.PetersonC.LeH. (2006). Unraveling the differential effects of motivational and skills, social, and self-management measures from traditional predictors of college outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 598-616. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.598
33.
RobbinsS. B.LauverK.LeH.DavisD.LangleyR.CarlstromA. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 261-288. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.261
34.
RobbinsS. B.OhI.LeH.ButtonC. (2009). Intervention effects on college performance and retention as mediated by motivational, emotional, and social control factors: Integrated meta-analytic path analyses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1163-1184. doi:10.1037/a0015738
35.
SchutzP. A.BensonJ.DeCuir-GunbyJ. T. (2008). Approach/avoidance motives, test emotions, and emotional regulation related to testing. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping: An International Journal, 21, 263-281. doi:10.1080/10615800701787672
36.
SchutzP. A.DiStefanoC.BensonJ.DavisH. A. (2004). The emotional regulation during test-taking scale. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping: An International Journal, 17, 253-269. doi:10.1080/1061580041000171086
37.
ShiZ.GaoX.ZhouR. (2014). Emotional working memory capacity in test anxiety. Learning and Individual Differences, 32, 178-183. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.03.011
38.
SmithG. T.FischerS.FisterS. M. (2003). Incremental validity principles in test construction. Psychological Assessment, 15, 467-477. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.15.4.467
39.
ThompsonB.DanielL. G. (1996). Factor analytic evidence for the construct validity of scores: A historical overview and some guidelines. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 197-208. doi:10.1177/0013164496056002001
40.
WebbT. L.MilesE.SheeranP. (2012). Dealing with feeling: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 775-808. doi:10.1037/a0027600
41.
ZeidnerM. (2007). Test anxiety in educational contexts: Concepts, findings, and future directions. In SchutzP. A.PekrunR. (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 165-184). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
