The aim of the current study was to explore bystander experiences during bullying episodes among children and youth attending a residential summer camp by investigating rates of witnessing and intervention, as well as individual motivations and characteristics associated with bystander intervention. The majority of children had witnessed bullying at least once in the past 3 weeks and reported intervening in some way. Among children who reported intervening, the strongest motivation appeared to be a sense of social justice. Among children who reported not intervening, the strongest motivation appeared to be the feeling that it was not their place to intervene because the bullying situation did not directly involve them and/or was not extremely severe. The determining factors for bystander intervention during bullying episodes differed between genders. Social self-efficacy predicted bystander intervention among girls, while empathy and attitudes about bullying predicted bystander intervention among boys. Implications for bullying prevention are discussed.
AndreouE.VlachouA.DidaskalouE. (2005). The roles of self-efficacy, peer interactions and attitudes in bully-victim incidents: Implications for intervention policy-practices. School Psychology International, 26, 545-562.
2.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
3.
CardN. A.StuckyB. D.SawalaniG. M.LittleT. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79, 1185-1229.
4.
CraigW.PeplerD. (1995). Peer processes in bullying and victimization: An observational study. Exceptionality Education Canada, 5, 81-95.
5.
CraigW.PeplerD. (1997). Observation of bullying and victimization in the schoolyard. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 13, 41-59.
6.
CraigW.PeplerD.BlaisJ. (2007). Responding to bullying: What works?School Psychology International, 28, 465-477.
7.
DarleyJ. M.LatanéB. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 377-383.
8.
DavisM. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113-126.
9.
DelfabbroP.WinefieldT.TrainorS.DollardM.AndersonS.MetzerJ.HammarstromA. (2006). Peer and teacher bullying/victimization of South Australian secondary school students: Prevalence and psychosocial profiles. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 71-90.
10.
EndresenI. M.OlweusD. (2001). Self-reported empathy in Norwegian adolescents: Sex differences, age trends, and relationship to bullying. In BohartA. C.ArthurC.StipekD. J. (Eds.), Constructive & destructive behavior (pp. 147-165). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
11.
FekkesM.PijpersF. I. M.Verloove-VanhorickS. P. (2005). Bullying: Who does what, when and where? Involvement of children, teachers and parents in bullying behavior. Health Education Research, 20(1), 81-91.
12.
ForeroR.McLellanL.RisselC.BaumanA. (1999). Bullying behavior and psychosocial health among school students in New South Wales, Australia: Cross sectional study. British Medical Journal, 319, 344-348.
13.
GiniG.AlbieroP.BenelliB.AltoeG. (2008). Determinants of adolescents’ active defending and passive bystanding behaviour in bullying. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 93-105.
14.
HawkinsD. L.PeplerD. J.CraigW. M. (2001). Naturalistic observations of peer interventions in bullying. Social Development, 10, 512-527.
15.
HazlerR. J. (1996). Breaking the cycle of violence: Interventions for bullying and victimization. Washington, DC: Accelerated Development.
16.
MangerT.EikelandO.AsbjornsenA. (2001). Effects of social-cognitive training on students’ empathy. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 60, 82-88.
17.
MitchellK. J.YbarraM.FinkelhorD. (2007). The relative importance of online victimization in understanding depression, delinquency, and substance use. Child Maltreatment, 12, 314-324.
18.
MolchoM.CraigW.DueP.PickettW.Harel-FischY.OverpeckM., & the HSBC Bullying Writing Group. (2009). Cross-national time trends in bullying behavior 1994-2006: Findings from Europe and North America. International Journal of Public Health, 54, 225-234.
19.
NanselT. R.OverpeckM.PillaR. S.RuanW. J.Simons-MortonB.ScheidtP. (2001). Bullying behaviours among U.S. youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2094-2100.
20.
NickersonA. B.MeleD.PrinciottaD. (2008). Attachment and empathy as predictors of roles as defenders or outsiders in bullying interactions. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 687-703.
21.
O’ConnellP.PeplerD.CraigW. (1999). Peer involvement in bullying: Insights and challenges for intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 437-452.
22.
OhI.HazlerR. J. (2009). Contributions of personal and situational factors to bystanders’ reactions to school bullying. School Psychology International, 30, 291-310.
23.
OlweusD.EndresenI. M. (1998). The importance of sex-of-stimulus object: Age trends and sex differences in empathic responsiveness. Social Development, 7, 370-388.
24.
PastorelliC.CapraraG. V.BanduraA. (1998). La misura dell’autoefficacia percepita in eta’ scolare: Uncontributo preliminare [The measurement of self-efficacy in school-age children: A preliminary contribution]. Eta’Evolutiva, 61, 28-40.
25.
PeplerD. (2006). Bullying interventions: A binocular perspective. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 15, 16-20.
26.
PeplerD.CraigW. (2008). Conclusion: Moving forward from lessons learned. In PeplerD.CraigW. (Eds.), Understanding and addressing bullying: An international perspective (pp. 311-320). Bloomington, IN: Authorhouse.
27.
PeplerD.CraigW.CummingsJ. (2009). Conclusion: Steps to respect for everyone by everyone. In CraigW.PeplerD.CummingsJ. (Eds.), Rise up for respectful relationships: Prevent bullying (pp. 199-206). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: National Printers.
28.
PoyhonenV.SalmivalliC. (2008). New directions in research and practice addressing bullying: Focus on defending behaviour. In PeplerD.CraigW. (Eds.), Understanding and addressing bullying: An international perspective (pp. 26-43). Bloomington, IN: AuthorHouse.
RigbyK.JohnsonB. (2006). Expressed readiness of Australian schoolchildren to act as bystanders in support of children who are being bullied. Educational Psychology, 26, 425-440.
31.
RiversI.PoteatV.NoretN.AshurstN. (2009). Observing bullying at school: The mental health implications of witness status. School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 211-223.
32.
RiversI.SmithP. K. (1994). Types of bullying behaviour and their correlates. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 359-368.
33.
RogersM. J.TisakM. S. (1996). Children’s reasoning about responses to peer aggression: Victim’s and witness’ expected and prescribed behaviors. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 259-269.
34.
SalmivalliC. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 112-120.
35.
SalmivalliC.LagerspetzK.BjorkqvistK.OstermanK.KaukiainenA. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1-15.
36.
SalmivalliC.LappalainenM.LagerspetzK. (1998). Stability and change of behaviour in connection with bullying in schools: A two-year follow-up. Aggressive Behavior, 24, 205-218.
37.
ScheithauerH.HayerT.PetermannF.JugertG. (2006). Physical, verbal, and relational forms of bullying among German students: Age trends, gender differences, and correlates. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 261-275.
38.
StevensV.Van OostP.De BourdeaudhuijL. (2000). The effects of an anti-bullying intervention programme on peers’ attitudes and behaviour. Journal of Adolescence, 23, 21-34.
39.
SuttonJ.SmithP. K.SwettenhamJ. (1999). Social cognition and bullying: Social inadequacy or skills manipulation?British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 435-450.
40.
TisakM. S.TisakJ. (1996). My sibling’s but not my friend’s keeper: Reasoning about responses to aggressive acts. Journal of Early Adolescence, 16, 324-339.
41.
WoodsS.WhiteE. (2005). The association between bullying behavior, arousal levels, and behavior problems. Journal of Adolescence, 28, 381-395.
42.
YbarraM. L.MitchellK. J. (2004). Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: A comparison of associated youth characterictics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 1308-1316.
43.
YbarraM. L.MitchellK. J. (2007). Prevalence and frequency of Internet harassment instigation: Implications for adolescent health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 189-195.
44.
YuileA.PeplerD.CraigW.ConnollyJ. (2006). The ethics of peeking behind the fence: Issues related to studying children’s aggression and victimization. In LeadbeaterB.NanisterE.BenoitC.JanssonM.MarshallA.RieckenT. (Eds.), Ethical issues in community-based research with children and youth (pp. 70-89). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
