The factor structure of the Learning Behaviors Scale (LBS) was examined with a sample of 393 randomly selected Canadian youths in a large western city. An identical four-factor structure was observed for the Canadian sample as was obtained in the standardization sample of U.S. youths and with another American sample. Principal axis exploratory factor analysis with equamax rotations produced factor structure coefficients that were very similar to those from the standardization sample, and factor invariance estimates corresponded to estimates from the standardization sample. Also, LBS raw scores from the Canadian sample did not meaningfully differ from the U.S. standardization sample raw scores.
BartlettM. S. (1954). A further note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximations in factor analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 16, 296-298.
2.
BeranT. N.TuttyL. (2002). Children’s reports of bullying and safety at school. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 17(2), 1-14.
3.
BrownA. L.CampioneJ. C. (1982). Modifying intelligence or modifying cognitive skills: More than a semantic quibble? In DettermanD. K.SternbergR. J. (Eds.), How and how much can intelligence be increased (pp. 215-230). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
4.
BuchananH. H.McDermottP. A.SchaeferB. A. (1998). Agreement among classroom observers of children’s stylistic learning behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 35, 355-361.
5.
CanivezG. L.BeranT. N. (2009). Adjustment Scales for Children and Adolescents: Factorial validity in a Canadian sample. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 24, 284-302.
6.
CanivezG. L.WillenborgE.KearneyA. (2004, July). Convergent and factorial validity of the LBS and ASCA. Paper presented at the 2004 Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Honolulu, HI.
7.
CanivezG. L.WillenborgE.KearneyA. (2006). Replication of the Learning Behaviors Scale factor structure with an independent sample. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24, 97-111.
8.
CattellR. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276.
9.
CarterJ. D.SwansonH. L. (1995). The relationship between intelligence and vigilance in children at risk. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 23, 201-220.
10.
CeciS. J. (1990). On intelligence . . . more or less: A bioecological treatise on intellectual development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
11.
CeciS. J. (1991). How much does schooling influence general intelligence and its cognitive components? A reassessment of the evidence. Developmental Psychology, 27, 703-722.
12.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
CudeckR. (2000). Exploratory factor analysis. In TinsleyH. E. A.BrownS. D. (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 265-296). New York, NY: Academic Press.
14.
DiPernaJ. C.ElliottS. N. (2000). Academic Competence Evaluation Scales manual K-12. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
15.
ElliottC. D. (1990). Differential Ability Scales: Introductory and technical handbook. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
16.
FabrigarL. R.WegenerD. T.MacCallumR. C.StrahanE. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272-299.
17.
FinnJ. D.CoxD. (1992). Participation and withdrawal among fourth-grade pupils. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 141-162.
18.
FloydF. J.WidamanK. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286-299.
19.
FrazierT. W.YoungstromE. A. (2007). Historical increase in the number of factors measured by commercial tests of cognitive ability: Are we overfactoring?Intelligence, 35, 169-182.
20.
GluttingJ. J.McDermottP. A. (1990a). Principles and problems in learning potential. In ReynoldsC. R.KamphausR. W. (Eds.), Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children: Intelligence and achievement (pp. 296-347). New York, NY: Guilford.
21.
GluttingJ. J.McDermottP. A. (1990b). Childhood learning potential as an alternative to traditional ability measures. Psychological Assessment, 2, 398-403.
22.
GottfredsonL. S. (2008). Of what value is intelligence? In PrifiteraA.SaklofskeD. H.WeissL. G. (Eds.), WISC-IV clinical assessment and intervention (2nd ed., pp. 545-563). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
23.
GorsuchR. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24.
GuttmanL. (1954). Some necessary and sufficient conditions for common factor analysis. Psychometrica, 19, 149-161.
25.
HarachiT. W.CatalanoR. F.HawkinsJ. D. (1999). United States. In SmithP. K.MoritaY.Junger-TasJ.OlweusD.CatalanoR.SleeP. (Eds.), The nature of school bullying (p. 279-295). London, UK: Routledge.
26.
HarrisonL. DEricksonP. G.AdlafE.FreemanC. (2001). The drugs-violence nexus among American and Canadian youth. Substance Use & Misuse, 36, 2065-2086.
27.
JensenA. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.
28.
JussimL. (1989). Teacher expectations: Self-fulfilling prophecies, perceptual biases, and accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 459-480.
29.
HornJ. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185.
30.
KaiserH. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.
31.
KlineP. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
32.
LautenschlagerG. J. (1989). A comparison of alternatives to conducting Monte Carlo analyses for determining parallel analysis criteria. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 365-395.
MacmannG. M.BarnettD. W. (1994). Structural analysis of correlated factors: Lessons from the verbal-performance dichotomy of the Wechsler Scales. School Psychology Quarterly, 9, 161-197.
35.
McDermottP. A. (1988). Agreement among diagnosticians or observers: Its importance and determination. Professional School Psychology, 3, 225-240.
36.
McDermottP. A. (1999). National scales of differential learning behaviors among American children and adolescents. School Psychology Review, 28, 280-291.
37.
McDermottP. A.GoldbergM. M.WatkinsM. W.StanleyJ. L.GluttingJ. J. (2006). A nationwide epidemiologic modeling study of LD: Risk, protection, and unintended impact. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 230-251.
38.
McDermottP. A.GreenL. F.FrancisJ. M.StottD. H. (1999). Learning Behaviors Scale. Philadelphia, PA: Edumetric and Clinical Science.
39.
McDermottP. A.MarstonN. C.StottD. H. (1993). Adjustment Scales for Children and Adolescents. Philadelphia, PA: Edumetric and Clinical Science.
40.
NasserF.BensonJ.WisenbakerJ. (2002). The performance of regression-based variations of the visual scree for determining the number of common factors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 397-419.
41.
NeisworthJ. T.BagnatoS. J. (1992). The case against intelligence testing in early intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 12, 1-20.
42.
NeisserU.BoodooG.BouchardT. J.Jr.BoykinA. W.BrodyN.CeciS. J.UrbinaS. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51, 77-101.
43.
O’ConnorB. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 396-402.
44.
ReschlyD. J. (1988). Special education reform: School psychology revolution. School Psychology Review, 17, 459-475.
45.
ReschlyD. J. (1997). Diagnostic and treatment utility of intelligence tests. In FlanaganD. P.GenshaftJ. L.HarrisonP. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 437-483). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
46.
SattlerJ. M. (2008). Assessment of children (5th ed.). San Diego, CA: Jerome M. Sattler.
47.
ScarrS. (1981). Testing for children: Assessment and the many determinants of intellectual competence. American Psychologist, 36, 1159-1166.
48.
SchaeferB. A.McDermottP. A. (1999). Learning behavior and intelligence as explanations for children’s scholastic achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 37, 299-313.
49.
SchuckL. A.Oehler-StinnettJ.StinnettT. A. (1995). Predictive validity of the Teacher Rating of Academic Achievement Motivation (TRAAM) with Hispanic students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 13, 143-156.
50.
SpitzH. H. (1986). The raising of intelligence: A selected history of attempts to raise retarded intelligence. Hilldale, NJ: Erlbaum.
51.
StroudK. C.ReynoldsC. R. (2006). School Motivation and Learning Strategies Inventory. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
52.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
53.
ThompsonB.DanielL. G. (1996). Factor analytic evidence for the construct validity of scores: A historical overview and some guidelines. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 197-208.
54.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2001). Profiles of General Demographic Characteristics: 2000 Census of Population and Housing.U.S. Department of Commerce. Retrieved on February 18, 2009from http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2000/dp1/2kh00.pdf
55.
Van de VijverF. J.LeungK. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
56.
Van de VijverF. J.PoorttingaY. H. (2005). Conceptual and methodological issues in adapting tests. In HambletonR. K.MerendaP. F.SpielbergerC. D. (Eds.), Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment (pp. 39-63). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
57.
VelicerW. F. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321-327.
58.
VelicerW. F.EatonC. A.FavaJ. L. (2000). Construct explication through factor or component analysis: A review and evaluation of alternative procedures for determining the number of factors or components. In GoffinR. D.HelmsE. (Eds.), Problems and solutions in human assessment: Honoring Douglas N. Jackson at seventy (pp. 41-71). Norwell, MA: Springer.
59.
VelicerW. F.PeacockA. C.JacksonD. N. (1982). A comparison of component and factor patterns: A Monte Carlo approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 17, 371-388.
60.
WatkinsM. W. (2000). Monte Carlo PCA for Parallel Analysis [Computer Software]. State College, PA: Author.
61.
WatkinsM. W. (2005). Factorial Invariance [Computer Software]. State College, PA: Author.
62.
WatkinsM. W. (2007). SEscree [Computer software]. State College, PA: Ed & Psych.
63.
WorrellF. C.VandiverB. J.WatkinsM. W. (2001). Construct validity of the Learning Behaviors Scale with an independent sample of students. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 207-215.
64.
WentzelK. R. (1991). Classroom competence may require more than intellectual ability: Reply to Jussim (1991). Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 156-158.
65.
YsseldykeJ. E.ChristensonS. L. (1988). Linking assessment to intervention. In GradenJ. L.ZinsJ. E.CurtisM. (Eds.), Alternative educational delivery systems: Enhancing educational opportunities for all students (pp. 91-109). Silver Spring, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
66.
ZoskiK. W.JursS. (1996). An objective counterpart to the visual scree test for factor analysis: The standard error scree. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 443-451.
67.
ZumboB. D. (1999). A handbook of the theory and methods of differential item functioning (DIF): Logistic regression modeling as a unitary framework for binary and Likert-type (ordinal) item scores. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Directorate of Human Resources Research and Evaluation, Department of National Defense.
68.
ZwickW. R.VelicerW. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432-442.
