A Two-Group Confirmatory Factor Analysis of The Arc ’s Self-Determination Scale With Students With Emotional/Behavioral Disorders or Learning Disabilities

Abstract

Given the emphasis on promoting self-determination in the field of special education and the corresponding use of scales to measure self-determination in research and practice, it is important to examine whether widely used self-determination assessments measure the same constructs among and between students from different disability categories. This study examined the equivalence of measurement and structural parameters of The Arc’s Self-Determination Scale (SDS) across groups of students with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) or learning disabilities (LD), using a two-group confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The results indicated that four essential elements of self-determined behavior that form the structure of the SDS (i.e., autonomy, self-regulation, psychological empowerment, and self-realization) are invariant across the two groups. In addition, students with EBD indicated lower levels of autonomy compared with those with LD. Implications and future directions for research and practice are discussed.

Keywords

self-determination The Arc’s Self-Determination Scale emotional and behavioral disorders learning disabilities confirmatory factor analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agran

Wehmeyer

Cavin

Palmer

(2010). Promoting active engagement in the general education classroom and access to the general education curriculum for students with cognitive disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45(2), 163–174.

Algozzine

Browder

Karvonen

Test

D. W.

Wood

W. M.

(2001). Effects of interventions to promote self-determination for individuals with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 71, 219–277.

Anderson

J. A.

Kutash

Duchnowski

A. J.

(2001). A comparison of the academic progress of students with EBD and students with LD. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 9, 106–115.

Aud

Hussar

Planty

Snyder

Bianco

Fox

. . . Drake

(2010). The Condition of Education 2010 (NCES 2010-028). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

Benitez

D. T.

Lattimore

Wehmeyer

M. L.

(2005). Promoting the involvement of students with emotional and behavioral disorders in career and vocational planning and decision making: The self-determined career development model. Behavioral Disorders, 30, 431–447.

Brown

T. A.

(2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford.

Carter

E. W.

Lane

K. L.

Crnobori

Bruhn

A. L.

Oakes

W. P.

(2011). Self-determination interventions for students with and at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders: Mapping the knowledge base. Behavioral Disorders, 36(2), 100–116.

Carter

E. W.

Lane

K. L.

Pierson

Glaeser

(2006). Self-determination skills of transition-age youth with emotional disturbances and learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72, 333–346.

Carter

E. W.

Trainor

A. A.

Owens

Swedeen

Sun

(2010). Self-determination prospects of youth with high-incidence disabilities: Divergent perspectives and related factors. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 18, 67–81.

10.

Cobb

R. B.

Alwell

(2009). Transition planning/coordinating interventions for youth with disabilities: A systematic review. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 70–81.

11.

Devlin

(2008). Enhancing the job performance of employees with disabilities using the self-determined career development model. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 43(4), 502–513.

12.

Field

Sarver

M. D.

Shaw

S. F.

(2003). Self-determination: A key to success in postsecondary education for students with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 339–349.

13.

Fulk

B. M.

Brigham

F. J.

Lohman

D. A.

(1998). Motivation and self-regulation: A comparison of students with learning and behavior problems. Remedial and Special Education, 19, 300–309.

14.

Halpern

A. S.

Herr

C. M.

Wolf

N. K.

Doren

Johnson

M. D.

Lawrence

J. D.

(1997). Next S.T.E.P.: Student transition and educational planning. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

15.

Hendricks

(2010). Employment and adults with autism spectrum disorders: Challenges and strategies for success. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 32, 125–134.

16.

Individuals with Disabilities Act Proposed Federal Regs. 34 C.F.R. 300.

17.

Jones

Crandall

(1986). Validation of a short index of self-actualization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 63–73.

18.

Kauffman

J. M.

(2005). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth (8th ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.

19.

Konrad

Fowler

C. H.

Walker

A. R.

Test

D. W.

Wood

W. M.

(2007). Effects of self-determination interventions on the academic skills of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 30(2), 89–113.

20.

Lane

K. L.

Carter

E. W.

Pierson

M. R.

Glaeser

B. C.

(2006). Academic, social, and behavioral characteristics of high school students with emotional disturbances or learning disabilities. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14, 108–117.

21.

Lee

S. H.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Palmer

S. B.

Soukup

J. H.

Little

T. D.

(2008). Self-determination and access to the general education curriculum. The Journal of Special Education, 42, 91–107.

22.

Lee

S. H.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Soukup

J. H.

Palmer

S. B.

(2010). Impact of curriculum modifications on access to the general education curriculum for students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 76(2), 213–233.

23.

Little

T. D.

(2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guildford.

24.

Little

T. D.

Cunningham

W. A.

Shahar

Widaman

K. F.

(2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173.

25.

Martorell

Gutierrez-Recacha

Pereda

Ayuso-Mateos

J. L.

(2008). Identification of personal factors that determine work outcome for adults with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 52, 1091–1101.

26.

Madaus

J. W.

(2006). Employment outcomes of university graduates with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 29, 19–31.

27.

Martin

J. E.

Marshall

L. H.

Maxson

L. M.

Jerman

P. L.

(1997). The self-directed IEP. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.

28.

Martin

J. E.

Van Dycke

J. L.

Christensen

W. R.

Greene

B. A.

Gardner

J. E.

Lovett

D. L.

(2006). Increasing student participation in IEP meetings: Establishing the self-directed IEP as an evidence-based practice. Exceptional Children, 72(3), 299–316.

29.

Mooney

Ryan

J. B.

Uhing

B. M.

Reid

Epstein

M. H.

(2005). A review of self-management interventions targeting academic outcomes for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Behavioral Education, 14, 203–331.

30.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

31.

Pierson

M. R.

Carter

E. W.

Lane

K. L.

Glaeser

B. C.

(2008). Factors influencing the self-determination of transition-age youth with high-incidence disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31, 115–125.

32.

Pintrich

P. R.

De Groot

(1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.

33.

Polsgrove

Smith

(2004). Informed practice in teaching self-control to children with emotional and behavioral disorders. In Rutherford

Quinn

Mathur

(Eds.), Handbook of research in emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 399–425). New York, NY: Guilford.

34.

Sabornie

E. J.

Cullinan

Osborne

S. S.

Brock

L. B.

(2005). Intellectual, academic, and behavioral functioning of students with high-incidence disabilities: A cross-categorical meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 72(1), 47–63.

35.

Schlomer

G. L.

Bauman

Card

N. A.

(2010). Best practices for missing data management in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 1–10.

36.

Shogren

K. A.

Palmer

S. B.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Williams Diehm

Little

T. D.

(2012). Effects of intervention with the self-determined learning model of instruction on access and goal attainment. Remedial and Special Education 33, 320 –330. doi:10.1177/0741932511410072

37.

Shogren

K. A.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Palmer

S. B.

Soukup

J. H.

Little

Garner

Lawrence

(2007). Examining individual and ecological predictors of the self-determination of students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 73, 488–509.

38.

Sigafoos

A. D.

Feinstein

C. B.

Damond

Reiss

(1988). The measurement of behavioral autonomy in adolescence: The Autonomous Functioning Checklist. In Feinstein

C. B.

Esman

Looney

Orvin

Schimel

Schwartzberg

Sorsky

Sugar

(Eds.), Adolescent Psychiatry (pp. 432–462). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

39.

Sowers

Powers

(1995). Enhancing the participation and independence of students with severe physical and multiple disabilities in performing community activities. Mental Retardation, 33, 209–220.

40.

Test

D. W.

Mazzotti

V. L.

Mustian

A. L.

Fowler

C. H.

Kortering

L. J.

Kohler

P. H.

(2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving postschool outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 160–181.

41.

VanBergeijk

Klin

Volkmar

(2008). Supporting more able students on the autism spectrum: College and beyond. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 1359–1370.

42.

Wagner

Davis

(2006). How are we preparing students with emotional disturbances for the transition to young adulthood?: Findings from the national longitudinal transition study—2. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14, 86–98.

43.

Wagner

Newman

(2012). Longitudinal transition outcomes of youth with emotional disturbances. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 35, 199–208.

44.

Wagner

Newman

Cameto

Levine

(2005). Changes over time in the early postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities (A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study (NLTS) and the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 [NLTS2]). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.

45.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

(1995). The Arc’s self-determination scale (SDS): Procedural guidelines. Lawrence, KS: Beach Centre on Disability.

46.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

(1999). A functional model of self-determination: Describing development and implementing instruction. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 14, 53–61.

47.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

(2005). Self-determination and individuals with severe disabilities: Reexamining meanings and misinterpretations. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30, 113–120.

48.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Abery

Mithaug

D. E.

Stancliffe

(2003). Theory in self-determination: Foundations for educational practice. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

49.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Garner

N. W.

Yeager

Lawrence

Davis

A. K.

(2006). Infusing self-determination into 18-21 services for students with intellectual or developmental disabilities: A multistage, multiple-component model. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 3–13.

50.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Kelchner

(1995). The Arc’s Self-Determination Scale. Arlington, TX: The Arc National Headquarters.

51.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Kelchner

Richards

(1996). Essential characteristics of self-determined behavior of individuals with mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 100, 632–642.

52.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Lawrence

Kelchner

Palmer

S. B.

Garner

N. W.

Soukup

(2004). Whose future is it anyway? A student-directed transition planning process (2nd Ed.). Lawrence, KS: Beach Center on Disabilities.

53.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Palmer

S. B.

(2003). Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three years after high school: The impact of self-determination. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 131–144.

54.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Palmer

S. B.

Lee

Williams-Diehm

Shogren

(2011). A randomized-trial evaluation of the effect of whose future is it anyway? On self-determination. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 34, 45–56.

55.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Palmer

S. B.

Shogren

K. A.

Williams-Diehm

Soukup

(2013). Establishing a causal relationship between interventions to promote self-determination enhanced student self-determination. Journal of Special Education, 46, 195–210. doi:10.1177/0022466910392377

56.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Palmer

S. B.

Soukup

J. H.

Garner

N. W.

Lawrence

(2007). Self-determination and student transition planning knowledge and skills: Predicting involvement. Exceptionality, 15(1), 31–44.

57.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Schwartz

(1998). The relationship between self-determination and quality of life for adults with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33, 3–12.

58.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Shogren

K. A.

Palmer

S. B.

Williams-Diehm

K. L.

Little

T. D.

Boulton

(2012). The impact of the self-determined learning model of instruction on student self-determination. Exceptional Children, 78(2), 135–153.

59.

Zhang

(2001). The effect of Next S.T.E.P. instruction on the self-determination skills of high school students with learning disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 24, 121–132.