Living the final days of life being cared for at home is a preference expressed by many. The data on the effectiveness of home-based end-of-life care (EoLC) intervention to improve the holistic conditions of terminally ill patients are scanty. This study sought to evaluate a psychosocial home-based EoLC intervention for terminally ill patients in Hong Kong.
Methods
A prospective cohort study was conducted, applying the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS) at 3 timepoints (service intake, 1-month, and 3-months after enrollment). A total of 485 eligible, consenting terminally ill people (mean age = 75.48, SD = 11.39) were enrolled, with 40.21% (n = 195) providing data at all 3 timepoints for this study.
Results
Decreasing symptom severity scores were observed for all IPOS psychosocial symptoms, and most physical symptoms, over the 3 timepoints. Improvements in depression and practical concerns had the highest omnibus time effects (F > 31.92, P < .01) and T0 to T2 paired comparison effects (Cohen's d > 0.54, P < .01). Physical symptoms of weakness/lack of energy, poor mobility, and poor appetite also showed significant improvements at T1 and T2 (Cohen's d: 0.22-0.46, P < .05). Bivariate regression analyses showed that improvements in anxiety, depression, and family anxiety were associated with improvements in physical symptoms of pain, shortness of breath, weakness/lack of energy, nausea, poor appetite, and poor mobility. Patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics were not associated with changes in symptoms.
Conclusions
The psychosocial home-based EoLC intervention effectively improved the psychosocial and physical status of terminally ill patients, irrespective of their clinical characteristics or demographics.
KnaulFMBhadeliaAHortonR. Health-related suffering: From lancet commission to DeclarAction. Lancet.2018;391(10135):2088–2089. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31123-1
MurtaghFERamsenthalerCFirthA, et al.A brief, patient- and proxy-reported outcome measure in advanced illness: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the integrated palliative care outcome scale (IPOS). Palliat Med. 2019;33(8):1045–1057. doi:10.1177/0269216319854264
4.
DawberRArmourKFerryPMukherjeeBCarterCMeystreC. Comparison of informal caregiver and named nurse assessment of symptoms in elderly patients dying in hospital using the palliative outcome scale. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019;9(2):175–182. doi:10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-000850
5.
CrockerTFSmithJKSkevingtonSM. Family and professionals underestimate quality of life across diverse cultures and health conditions: Systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol.2015;68(5):584–595. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.007
6.
JonesJMMcPhersonCJZimmermannCRodinGLeLWCohenSR. Assessing agreement between terminally ill cancer Patients’ reports of their quality of life and family caregiver and palliative care physician proxy ratings. J Pain Symptom Manage.2011;42(3):354–365. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.11.018
7.
WarthMKesslerJKoehlerFAguilar-RaabCBardenheuerHJDitzenB. Brief psychosocial interventions improve quality of life of patients receiving palliative care: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Palliat Med. 2019;33(3):332–345. doi:10.1177/0269216318818011
8.
JiaoKChowAYM. The connections of physical and psychosocial symptoms among patients with terminal illnesses: A network analysis. Palliat Med. 2023;37(1):120–130. doi:10.1177/02692163221128452
9.
LaiXBChenLQChenSHXiaHO. An examination of home-based end-of-life care for cancer patients: A qualitative study. BMC Palliat Care. 2019;18(1), doi:10.1186/s12904-019-0501-y
10.
WallerASanson-FisherRZdenkowskiNDouglasCHallAWalshJ. The right place at the right time: Medical oncology Outpatients’ perceptions of location of End-of-life care. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018;16(1):35–41. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2017.7025
11.
O’LearyMJO’BrienACMurphyM, et al.Place of care: From referral to specialist palliative care until death. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2017;7(1):53–59. doi:10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000696
12.
ChanHYChungCKTamSSChowRS. Community palliative care services on addressing physical and psychosocial needs in people with advanced illness: a prospective cohort study. BMC Palliat Care. 2021;20(1), doi:10.1186/s12904-021-00840-0
13.
ChanHYLLeeDTFWooJ. Diagnosing gaps in the development of palliative and End-of-life care: A qualitative exploratory study. IJERPH. 2019;17(1):151. Available from: doi:10.3390/ijerph17010151
14.
ChungRY-NWongEL-YKiangN, et al.Knowledge, attitudes, and preferences of advance decisions, End-of-life care, and place of care and death in Hong Kong. A population-based telephone survey of 1067 adults. J Am Med Dir Assoc.2017;18(4):367.e19–367.e27. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2016.12.066
15.
NagataCTsutsumiMKiyonagaANogakiH. Evaluation of a training program for community-based end-of-life care of older people toward aging in place: A mixed methods study. Nurse Educ Pract.2021;54:103091. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103091
16.
BannonFCairnduffVFitzpatrickD, et al.Insights into the factors associated with achieving the preference of home death in terminal cancer: A national population-based study. Pall Supp Care. 2018;16(6):749–755. doi:10.1017/s1478951517000876
17.
AntunesBRodriguesPPHigginsonIJFerreiraPL. Determining the prevalence of palliative needs and exploring screening accuracy of depression and anxiety items of the integrated palliative care outcome scale—A multi-centre study. BMC Palliat Care. 2020;19(1), doi:10.1186/s12904-020-00571-8
18.
CostaVEarleCCEsplenMJ, et al.The determinants of home and nursing home death: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Palliat Care. 2016;15(1), doi:10.1186/s12904-016-0077-8
19.
EagarKClaphamSPAllinghamSF. Palliative care is effective: But hospital symptom outcomes superior. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020;10(2):186–190. doi:10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001534
20.
Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration. Patient outcomes in palliative care; Australian National Report for July–December 2021. March 2022. Available from: https://ahsri.uow.edu.au/pcoc/reports/national/index.html (accessed 7 September 2022).
21.
LinC-PTsayM-SChangY-H, et al.A comparison of the survival, place of death, and medical utilization of terminal patients receiving hospital-based and community-based palliative home care: A retrospective and propensity score matching cohort study. IJERPH. 2021;18(14):7272. doi:10.3390/ijerph18147272
22.
GomesBCalanzaniNKoffmanJHigginsonIJ. Is dying in hospital better than home in incurable cancer and what factors influence this? A population-based study. BMC Med. 2015;13(1), doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0466-5
23.
WongFKYNgAYMLeePH, et al.Effects of a transitional palliative care model on patients with end-stage heart failure: A randomised controlled trial. Heart. 2016;102(14):1100–1108. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308638
24.
SchimmelNBreeksemaJJSmith-ApeldoornSYVeraartJvan den BrinkWSchoeversRA. Psychedelics for the treatment of depression, anxiety, and existential distress in patients with a terminal illness: A systematic review. Psychopharmacology. 2022;239(1):15–33. doi:10.1007/s00213-021-06027-y
25.
Castro-SchiloLGrimmKJ. Using residualized change versus difference scores for longitudinal research. J Soc Pers Relat.2018;35(1):32–58. doi:10.1177/0265407517718387
26.
SunC-R. An Examination of the Four-Part Theory of the Chinese Self: The Differentiation and Relative Importance of the Different Types of Social-Oriented Self. Front Psychol. 2017;8, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01106
27.
LawM-CLauBH-PKwokAYY, et al.Empowering families facing end-stage nonmalignant chronic diseases with a holistic, transdisciplinary, community-based intervention: 3 months outcome of the life rainbow program. Pall Supp Care. 2021;19(5):530–539. doi:10.1017/s1478951520001224
28.
SaracinoRMRosenfeldBBreitbartWChochinovHM. Psychotherapy at the End of life. Am J Bioeth.2019;19(12):19–28. doi:10.1080/15265161.2019.1674552
GaoWWilsonRHepgulN, et al.Effect of short-term integrated palliative care on patient-reported outcomes among patients severely affected with long-term neurological conditions. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(8):e2015061. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15061
31.
Oosterveld-VlugMGCustersBHofstedeJ, et al.What are essential elements of high-quality palliative care at home? An interview study among patients and relatives faced with advanced cancer. BMC Palliat Care. 2019;18(1), doi:10.1186/s12904-019-0485-7
32.
LauBHLukJKFongCH, et al.Facilitators and barriers to advance care planning programmes targeting older care home residents: A qualitative study. Asian J Gerontol Geriatr. 2019;14(2):81–88. doi:10.12809/ajgg-2018-326-oa
33.
HoAHYLukJKHChanFHW, et al.Dignified palliative long-term care. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2016;33(5):439–447. doi:10.1177/1049909114565789
34.
WangYTangCFanXShiraiKDongJ-Y. Mind–body therapies for older adults with dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Geriatr Med. 2022;4:1–11. doi:10.1007/s41999-022-00639-z
35.
ToqanDMalakMZAyedAHamaidehSHAl-amerR. Perception of Nurses’ Knowledge about Palliative Care in West Bank/ Palestine: Levels and Influencing Factors. J Palliat Care. 2022;082585972211339, doi:10.1177/08258597221133958
36.
LauBHPChowAYMNgT-K, et al.Comparing the efficacy of integrative body-mind-spirit intervention with cognitive behavioral therapy in patient-caregiver parallel groups for lung cancer patients using a randomized controlled trial. J Psychosoc Oncol.2020;38(4):389–405. doi:10.1080/07347332.2020.1722981
37.
AmanoKMaedaIIshikiH, et al.Effects of enteral nutrition and parenteral nutrition on survival in patients with advanced cancer cachexia: Analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study. Clin Nutr.2021;40(3):1168–1175. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2020.07.027
38.
HolmMAlvarizaAFürstC-J, et al.Recruiting participants to a randomized controlled trial testing an intervention in palliative cancer care – the perspectives of health care professionals. Eur J Oncol Nurs.2017;31:6–11. doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2017.09.001
