Advance directives are legal documents that include living wills and durable health care power of attorney documents. They are critical components of care for seriously ill patients which are designed to be implemented when a patient is terminally ill and incapacitated. We sought to evaluate potential reasons for why advance directives were not appropriately implemented, by reviewing the electronic health record (EHR) in patients with terminal cancer.
Methods:
A retrospective analysis of the EHR of 500 cancer patients from 1/1/2013 to 12/31/2016 was performed. Data points were manually collected and entered in a central database.
Results:
Of the 500 patients, 160 (32%) had an advance directive (AD). The most common clinical terminology used by physicians indicating a terminal diagnosis was progressive (36.6%) and palliative (31%). The most common clinical terminology indicating incapacity was altered mental status (25.6%), and not oriented (14%). 34 (6.8%) patients met all criteria of having a terminal diagnosis, a documented AD, and were deemed incapacitated. Of these patients who met all of these data points, their ADs were implemented on average 1.7 days (SD: 4.4 days) after which they should have been. This resulted in a total of 58 days of additional care provided.
Discussion:
This study provided insight on to how ADs are managed in day to day practice in the hospital. From our analysis it appears that physicians are able to identify when a patient is terminal, however, it is typically later than it should have been recognized. Further studies should be performed focusing on harnessing the power of the EHR and providing physicians formative and evaluative feedback of practice patterns to ensure that ADs are honored when appropriate.
Institute of Medicine, Dying in America: Improving Quality and Honoring Individual Preferences Near the End of Life (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 2015), 133.
2.
PerkinsHSBauerRLHazudaHPSchoolfieldJD. Impact of legal liability, family wishes, and other “external factors” on physicians’ life-support decisions. Am J Med. 1990;89(2):185–194.
3.
DanisMSoutherlandLIGarrettJM, et al.A prospective study of advance directives for life-sustaining care. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(13): 882–888.
4.
FriedTRSteinMDO’SullivanPSBrockDWNovackDH. Limits of patient autonomy: Physician attitudes and practices regarding life-sustaining treatments and euthanasia. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153(6):722–728.
5.
AschDAHansen-FlaschenJLankenPN. Decisions to limit or continue life-sustaining treatment by critical care physicians in the United States: conflicts between physicians’ practices and patients’ wishes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;151 (2 Pt 1):288–292.
6.
MebaneEWOmanRFKroonenLTGoldsteinMK. The influence of physician race, age, and gender on physician attitudes toward advance care directives and preferences for end-of-life decision-making. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999;47(5):579–591.
7.
WilkinsonAWengerNShugarmanLR. Literature Review on Advance Directives. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation Office of Disability, Aging and Long-Term Care Policy. 2007 June; 1–87.
8.
SmithDGWigtonRSModeling decisions to use tube feeding in seriously ill patients. Arch Intern Med. 1987;147(7):1242–1245.
9.
TolleSWTildenVPNelsonCADunnPM. A prospective study of the efficacy of the physician order form for life-sustaining treatment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998;46(9):1097–1102.
10.
MottPDBarkerWH. Hospital and medical care use by nursing home patients: The effect of patient care plans. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1988;36(1):47–53.
11.
HinkkaHKosunenEMetsanojaRLammiUKKellokumpu-LehtinenP. Factors affecting physicians’ decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatments in terminal care. J Med Ethics. 2002;28(2):109–114.
12.
HardinSBYusufalyYA. Difficult end-of-life treatment decisions: do other factors trump advance directives?Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(14):1531–1533.
13.
MorrisonRSChichinECarterJBurackOLantzMMeierDE. The effect of a social work intervention to enhance advance care planning documentation in the nursing home. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(2):290–294.
14.
HoweEG. When family members disagree. J Clin Ethics. 2007;18(4):331–339.
15.
MarcoCABessmanESKelenGD. Ethical issues of cardiopulmonary resuscitation: comparison of emergency physician practices from 1995 to 2007. Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16(3):270–273.
16.
NicholasLHLangaKMIwashynaTJWeirDR. Regional variation in the association between advance directives and end-of-life Medicare expenditures. JAMA. 2011;306(13):1447–1453.
17.
LivingstonGLewis-HolmesEPitfieldC, et al.Improving the end-of-life for people with dementia living in a care home: An intervention study. Int Psycho Geriatr. 2013;25(11):1849–1858.
18.
BrownBA.The history of advance directives. A literature review. J Gerontol Nurs. 2003;29(9):4–14.
19.
FagerlinASchneiderCE. Enough. The failure of the living will. Hastings Cent Rep. 2004; 34(2):30–42.
20.
JenningsBKaebnickGEMurrayTH. Improving End of Life Care: Why Has It Been So Difficult?Hastings Center Special Report. 2005(Report Number 35).
21.
HawkinsNADittoPHDanksJHSmuckerWD. Micromanaging death: process preferences, values, and goals in end-of-life medical decision making. Gerontologist. 2005; 45(1):107–117.
22.
HickmanSEHammesBJMossAHTolleSW. Hope for the future: achieving the original intent of advance directives. Hastings Cent Rep. 2005;Spec No: S26–30.
23.
GageBKhatutskyGWienerJMO’KeeffeJO’KeeffeC. Medicare and End-of-life Care: A review of the literature. Waltham, MA: RTI International; 2006.
24.
RaoJKAndersonLALinF-CLauxJP. Completion of Advance Directives Among U.S. Consumers. Am J Pre Med. 2014;46(1):65–70.
25.
SilveiraMJWitalaWPietteJ.Advance directive completion by elderly Americans: A decade of change. J Am Geri Soc. 2014;62(4):706–710.
26.
KishSKMartinCGPriceKJ. Advance directives in critically ill cancer patients. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2000;12(3):373–383.
27.
BravoGDuboisMFPaquetM. Advance directives for health care and research: prevalence and correlates. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2003;17(4):215–222.
28.
PfeiferMPMitchellCKChamberlainL. The value of disease severity in predicting patient readiness to address end-of-life issues. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(5):609–612.
29.
KnauftENielsenELEngelbergRAPatrickDLCurtisJR. Barriers and facilitators to end-of-life care communication for patients with COPD. Chest. 2005;127(6):2188–2196.
30.
PerryESwartzJBrownSSmithDKellyGSwartzR. Peer mentoring: a culturally sensitive approach to end-of-life planning for long-term dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005;46(1):111–119.
31.
HarlowK.An Educational Intervention to Increase Advance Directive Completion. 2016. All Regis University Theses. Paper721.
32.
WengerNSPhillipsRSTenoJM. Physician-patient communication in SUPPORT. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(Suppl 5): S52–60.
33.
LorenzKLynnJMortonSC, et al.End-of-Life Care and Outcomes. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). 2004; 110 (#05-E004 -1).
34.
SilveiraMJKimSYHLangaKM. Advance Directives and Outcomes of Surrogate Decision Making before Death. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(13):1211–1218.
35.
SilveiraMJWiitalaWPietteJ.Advance Directive Completion by Elderly Americans: A Decade of Change. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62(4):706–710.
36.
TenoJMGruneirASchwartzZNandaAWetleT. Association Between Advance Directives and Quality of End-of-Life Care: A National Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(2):189–194.
37.
HeylandDKDodekPRockerG, et al.What matters most in end-of-life care: perceptions of seriously ill patients and their family members. CMAJ. 2006;174(5):627–633.
38.
HeylandDKDodekPYouJJ, et al.Validation of quality indicators for end-of-life communication: results of a multicentre survey. CMAJ. 2017;189(30): E980–E989.
39.
MyersJ.Measuring quality of end-of-life communication and decision-making: Do we have this right?CMAJ. 2017;189(30): E978–E979.
40.
TowsleyGLHirschmanKB. Talking about end-of-life care: Perspectives of nursing home residents. Geriatr Nurs. 2017: S0197-4572(17)30171-4.
41.
SelmanLEBrightonLJHawkinsA, et al.The effect of communication skills training for generalist palliative care providers on patient-reported outcomes and clinician behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017;54(3):404–416.e5.
42.
Van ScoyLJWatson-MartinEBohrTALeviBHGreenMJ. End-of-Life Conversation Game Increases Confidence for Having End-of-Life Conversations for Chaplains-in-Training. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017;35(4):592–600.
43.
SchneidermanLJKaplanRMRosenbergETeetzelH. Do Physicians’ Own Preferences for Life-Sustaining Treatment Influence Their Perceptions of Patients’ Preferences? A Second Look. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.1997;6(2):131–137.
44.
PeriyakoilVSNeriEFongAKraemerHC. Do unto others: Doctors’ Personal End-of-life Resuscitation Preferences and Their Attitudes Toward Advance Directives. PLOS One. 2014;9(5):e98246.
45.
GramelspacherGPZhouXHHannaMPTierneyWM. Preferences of Physicians and Their Patients for End-of-Life Care. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12(6):346–351.
46.
NorrisWMNielsenELEngelbergRACurtisJR. Treatment preferences for resuscitation and critical care among homeless persons. Chest. 2005;127(6):2180–2187.
47.
PizzoPAWalkerDM. Should We Practice What We Profess? Care near the End of Life. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(7):595–598.
48.
MiuraYAsaiAMatsushimaM, et al.Families’ and physicians’ predictions of dialysis patients’ preferences regarding life-sustaining treatments in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;47(1):122–130.
49.
SudoreRLLumHDYouJJ, et al.Defining Advance Care Planning for Adults: A Consensus Definition From a Multidisciplinary Delphi Panel. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017;53(5):821–832. e1.
50.
LocalioAR. Patient compensation without litigation: a promising development. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153(4):266–267.
