Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Nous proposons une mesure de la substituabilité avec des données de panel multi-catégories. Celle-ci repose sur le postulat selon lequel, dans un ensemble de substituts directs (ou de considérations), le consommateur effectue un choix unique et donc que tout achat simultané est signe de complémentarité ou d'indépendance mais pas de substituabilité. Ce postulat et l'indice de substituabilité proposés sont validés dans une application mettant en jeux quatre catégories indépendantes (détergents, soupes, yaourts et ketchups). De plus, nous montrons que l'utilisation de l'information fournie par les achats simultanés permet d'améliorer significativement la validité d'indices basés sur le brand switching. Une illustration sur l'univers hétérogène des boissons comprenant plusieurs catégories de produits imbriquées (119 marques) est ensuite proposée. L'intérêt théorique et pratique de notre approche est d'autoriser des analyses sur des univers étroits et homogènes (tactiques) mais aussi larges et hétérogènes (stratégiques), ce qui peut aider les réflexions en matière de gestion de gammes, de positionnement et d'extension de marques.

Keywords

substituabilité complémentarité achat simultané définition et structure des marchés gammes de produits extension de marque

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allenby

Ginter

(1995), The Effects of In-Store Displays and Feature Advertising on Consideration Sets, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12, 1, 67–80

Andrews

Srinivasan

T. C.

(1995), Studying Consideration Effects in Empirical Choice Models Using Scanner Panel Data, Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 1, 30–41

Aurier

Ph.

(1991), Mesure de la concurrence à partir de comparaisons de profils de transferts entre marques, Actes du congrès des IAE, Clermont Ferrand, octobre

Aurier

Ph.

Cooper

(1993), Définir les frontières d'un marché à partir de données de panels multi-catégories: Approche exploratoire, Actes du vingtième séminaire international de recherche en marketing, IAE Aix-Marseille III, La Londe Les Maures, juin, 1–22

Barsalou

L. W.

(1985), Ideals, Central Tendency, and Frequency of Estantiation as Determinants of Graded Structure in Categories, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 11, 4, 629–654

Bourgeois

Haines

Summers

(1980), Defining an Industry, Market Measurement and Analysis, éd. Montgomery

Wittink

, Cambridge, Marketing Science Institute

Bronnenberg

B. J.

Vanhonacker

W. R.

(1996), Limited Choice Sets, Local Price Response, and Implied Measures of Price Competition, Journal of Marketing Research, 33, 2, 163–173

Carroll

(1976), Spatial, Non-Spatial and Hybrid Models for Scaling, Psychometrika, 41, 4, 439–463

Chandon

J.-L.

Strazzieri

(1986), Une analyse de structure de marché sur la base de la mesure de l'ensemble évoque, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 1, 1, 17–40

10.

Cooper

Nakanishi

(1988), Market-Share Analysis, International Series in Quantitative Marketing, London, Kluwer Academic Publisher

11.

Day

Shocker

Srivastava

(1979), Customer-Oriented Approaches to Identifying Product-Markets, Journal of Marketing, 43, 1, 8–19

12.

Elrod

(1991), Internal Analysis of Market Structure: Recent Development and Prospects, Marketing Letters, 2, 3, 253–266

13.

Fornell

Denison

(1982), A New Approach to Nonlinear Structural Modeling by Use of Confirmatory Multidimensional Scaling, A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis, vol. 1 Methods, Claes Fornell Editor, Praeger, 367–392

14.

Gensh

D. H.

Soofi

(1995), Information-Theoric Estimation of Individual Consideration Set, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12, 1, 25–38

15.

Givon

(1985), Variety Seeking, Market Partitioning and Segmentation, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2, 2, 117–127

16.

Johnson

M. D.

Lehmann

D. R.

Fornell

Horne

D. R.

(1991), Attribute Abstraction, Feature-Dimensionality, and the Scaling of Product Similarities, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 9, 131–147

17.

Johnson

M. D.

Herrmann

Gutshe

(1995), A Within-Attribute Model of Variety-Seeking Behavior, Marketing Letters, 6, 3, 235–243

18.

Johnson

M. D.

Lehmann

D. R.

(1997), Consumer Experience and Consideration Sets for Brands and Product Category, Advances in Consumer Research, 24, Merrie Brucks & Deborah MacInnis Editors, 295–300

19.

Kahn

Kalwani

Donald

(1986), Measuring Variety-Seeking and Reinforcement Behaviors Using Panel Data, Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 2, 89–100

20.

Lai

A. W.

(1995), Consumer Values, Product Benefits and Customer Value: A Consumption Behavior Approach, Advances in Consumer Research, 22, Franck Kardes et Mita Sujan Editors, 381–388

21.

Lattin

McAlister

(1985), Using a Variety-Seeking Model to Identify Substitute and Complementary Relationships Among Competing Products, Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 3, 330–339

22.

Laurent

(1978), A Study of Multiple Variant Consumption for Frequently Purchased Consumer Products, Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, MA

23.

McAlister

(1979), Choosing Multiple Items From a Product Class, Journal of Consumer Research, 6, 3, 213–224

24.

McAlister

Pessemier

(1982), Variety Seeking Behavior: An Interaction Disciplinary Review, Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 3, 311–322

25.

McFadden

(1986), The Choice Theory Approach to Market Research, Marketing Science, 3, 4, 275–297

26.

Nedungadi

(1990), Recall and Consumer Consideration Sets: Influencing Choice Without Altering Brand Evaluations, Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 3, 245–253

27.

Pessemier

Burger

Ph.

Teach

Tigert

(1971), Using Laboratory Brand Preference Scales to Predict Consumer Brand Purchases, Management Science, 17, 6, 371–385

28.

Pras

Summers

(1975), A Comparison of Linear and Nonlinear Evaluation Process Models, Journal of Marketing Research, 12, 3, 276–281

29.

Rao

Sabavala

(1981), Inference of Hierarchical Choice Process from Panel Data, Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 1, 85–96

30.

Ratneshwar

Pechmann

Shocker

A. D.

(1996), Goal-Derived Categories and the Antecedents of Across-Category Consideration, Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 23, 3, 240–250

31.

Shocker

A. D.

Ben-Akiva

Boccara

Nedungadi

(1991), Consideration Set Influences on Consumer Decision-Making and Choice: Issues, Models, and Suggestions, Marketing Letters, 2, 3, 181–197

32.

Simonson

(1990), The Effect of Purchase Quantity and Timing on Variety-Seeking Behavior, Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 3, 150–162

33.

Solomon

M. R.

(1983), The Role of Product as Social Stimulus, Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 3, 319–329

34.

Stefflre

(1972), Some Applications of Multidimensional Scaling, Multidimensional Scaling Theory and Applications in the Behavioral Sciences, vol. 2 Application, Roger Shepard, Kimball Rommey and Sara Nerlove Editors, New York, Seminar Press, 211–243

35.

Trivedi

Bass

Rao

(1994), A Model of Stochastic Variety Seeking, Marketing Science, 13, 3, 274–298

36.

Urban

Johnson

Ph.

Hauser

(1984), Testing Competitive Market Structure, Marketing Science, 3, 2, 83–112

37.

Van Trijp

H.C.M.

Hoyer

W. D.

Inman

J. J.

(1996), Why Switch? Product Category-Level Explanations for True Variety-Seeking Behavior, Journal of Marketing Research, 33, 3, 281–292

Achat simultané et mesure de la substituabilité avec des données de panel multi-catégories

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References