Saisir la complexité de la consommation audiovisuelle par la catégorisation descendante de ses plateformes : évidences expérimentales pour un agenda scientifique,marketing et politique
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online October, 2025
Saisir la complexité de la consommation audiovisuelle par la catégorisation descendante de ses plateformes : évidences expérimentales pour un agenda scientifique,marketing et politique
La consommation audiovisuelle (AV) se déploie depuis des plateformes toujours plus nombreuses et complexes à catégoriser. L’analyse détaillée de cette catégorisation est au cœur de cet article. Plusieurs approches théoriques de la catégorisation cognitive sont mobilisées puis appréciées selon leur capacité à capturer la complexité du champ AV. Apparaissant comme la plus appropriée sur ce critère, l’approche descendante, intégrant le principe des catégories dérivées de buts, sert au déploiement d’une expérimentation (N=163). Celle-ci examine l’influence de buts personnels (s’informer, se divertir) et situationnels (mobilité, sédentarité) sur la catégorisation de plateformes AV. Les résultats révèlent que, sous l’effet principal et combiné de ces buts, des plateformes dissemblables gagnent en similarité aux yeux des consommateurs. La portée de ces résultats est discutée : i) pour les offreurs et les régulateurs dans la conduite de leurs politiques (marketing et publiques) ; et ii) pour le futur des recherches sur la consommation AV.
AfzalMWuXChenHet al. (2016) Web video categorization using category-predictive classifiers and category-specific concept classifiers. Neurocomputing214(19): 175–190.
2.
AgrawalNNajafi-AsadolahiSSmithSA (2020) Optimization of operational decisions in digital advertising: a literature review. In: RaySYinS (éds) Channel Strategies and Marketing Mix in a Connected World. Cham: Springer99–146.
3.
AlbaJWHutchinsonJW (1987) Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research13(4): 411–454.
4.
AlexandreOBenbouzidBLelievreA, et al (2024) Au marché de Youtube : organisation, revenus et topologie. Réseaux246–247(4–5): 43–88.
5.
ArnoldS (2016) Netflix and the myth of choice/participation/autonomy. In: McDonaldKSmith-RowseyD (éds) The Netflix Effect. Technology and Entertainment in the 21st Century. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, 49–62.
6.
AubertBMeyroninB (2020) De MacGyver à Mad Men. Quand les séries tv nous enseignent le management. Paris: Dunod.
7.
Bacache-BeauvalletMBourreauM (2022) Économie des plateformes. Paris: La Découverte.
8.
BarsalouLW (1982) Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts. Memory & Cognition10(1): 82–93.
9.
BarsalouLW (1983) Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition11(3): 211–227.
10.
BarsalouLW (1985) Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology11(4): 629–654.
11.
BarsalouLW (1991) Deriving categories to achieve goals. Psychology of Learning and Motivation27: 1–64.
12.
BasuK (1993) Consumers’ categorization processes: an examination with two alternative methodological paradigms. Journal of Consumer Psychology2(2): 97–121.
13.
BéjeanMBenaventCetDePechpeyrouP (2022) Ouvrir la boîte noire des plateformes : structures, acteurs, opérations. Innovations69(3): 5–14.
14.
BelkRW (1975) Situational variables and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research2(3): 157–164.
15.
BenaventC (2016) Plateformes. Sites collaboratifs, marketplaces, réseaux sociaux. . . Comment ils influencent nos choix. Limoges: FYP éditions.
16.
BeuscartJSCoavouxSMaillardS (2019) Les algorithmes de recommandation musicale et l’autonomie de l’auditeur : Analyse des écoutes d’un panel d’utilisateurs de streaming. Réseaux213(1): 17–47.
17.
BeuscartJSCoavouxSGarrocqJB (2023) Listening to music videos on YouTube. Digital consumption practices and the environmental impact of streaming. Journal of Consumer Culture23(3): 654–671.
18.
BlanchetV (2017) « We make markets ». Le rôle du salon Ethical Fashion Show dans la catégorisation de la mode éthique. Recherche et Applications en Marketing32(2): 27–47.
19.
BleierAFossenBLShapiraM (2024) On the role of social media platforms in the creator economy. International Journal of Research in Marketing41(3): 411–426.
20.
BroderA (2002) A taxonomy of web search. ACM Sigir forum36(2): 3–10.
21.
BufDMȘtefănițăO (2020) Uses and gratifications of YouTube: a comparative analysis of users and content creators. Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations22(2): 75–89.
22.
CalderBIsaacMMalthouseE (2016) How to capture consumer experiences: a context-specific approach to measuring engagement: predicting consumer behavior across qualitatively different experiences. Journal of Advertising Research56(1): 39–52.
23.
CaliandroAGandiniABainottiL, et al (2024) The platformization of consumer culture: a theoretical framework. Marketing Theory24(1): 3–21.
24.
ChalabyJK (2023) Television in the Streaming Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
ChalabyJK (2024) The streaming industry and the platform economy: an analysis. Media, Culture & Society46(3): 552–571.
26.
ChomelL (2023) YouTube et l’initiation politique des jeunes adultes. Quand les commentaires amorcent une pratique délibérative. Revue française des sciences de l’information et de la communication26: 1–19.
27.
ChowdhuryTGMurshedF (2020) Categorization flexibility and unconventional choices: is life an adventure?European Journal of Marketing54(8): 1963–1986.
28.
ChowdhuryTGMurshedFKhareA (2018) Flexible flexibility! Food categorization flexibility and utilitarian preference. Journal of Consumer Marketing35(1): 1–10.
29.
ClarkA (1997) Being There. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30.
CohenJBBasuK (1987) Alternative models of categorization: toward a contingent processing framework. Journal of Consumer Research13(4): 455–472.
31.
CunninghamSMehtaSLunardiG, et al (2022) YouTube: the interface between television and social media entertainment. In: JohnsonD (éd) From Networks to Netflix. New York: Routledge, 213–222.
32.
CzaniarwskaBRhodesC (2006) Strong plots: the relationship between popular culture and management theory and practice. In: GagliardiPCzaniarwskaB (éds) Management Education and Humanities. London: Edwar Elgar, 195–218.
33.
De OliveiraRPentoneyCPritchard-BermanM (2018) YouTube needs: understanding user s’ motivations to watch videos on mobile devices. 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, Barcelone, 3–6 septembre.
34.
DehghaniMKhorram NiakiMRamezaniI, et al (2016) Evaluating the influence of YouTube advertising for attraction of young customers. Computers in Human Behavior59: 165–172.
35.
DelwicheAHendersonJJ (2013) The Participatory Cultures Handbook. New York: Routledge.
36.
DengYMelaCF (2018) TV viewing and advertising targeting. Journal of Marketing Research55(1): 99–118.
37.
DolanRConduitJFahyJ, et al (2016) Social media engagement behaviour: a uses and gratifications perspective. Journal of Strategic Marketing24(3–4): 261–277.
38.
DoyleG (2023) SVoDs, new norms and the challenge for public service media. Journal of Digital Media & Policy14(3): 287–302.
39.
DufourSGilliotteQ (2024) Le YouTube contestataire. Saisir l’informalisation par les vidéos de « décryptage » de la réforme des retraites. Questions de communication46: 217–248.
40.
DurandRGranqvistNTyllströmA (2017) From categories to categorization: a social perspective on market categorization. In: DurandRGranqvistNTyllströmA (éds.) From Categories To Categorization: Studies in Sociology, Organizations and Strategy at the Crossroads. Leeds: Emerald Publishing, 3–30.
41.
EdelingAWiesS (2024) Embracing entrepreneurship in the creator economy: the rise of creatrepreneurs. International Journal of Research in Marketing41(3): 436–454.
42.
FarchyJBideauGTallecS (2022) Content quotas and prominence on VOD services: new challenges for European audiovisual regulators. International Journal of Cultural Policy28(4): 419–430.
43.
FeiereisenSRasolofoarisonDDe ValckK, et al (2019) Understanding emerging adults’ consumption of TV series in the digital age: a practice-theory-based approach. Journal of Business Research95: 253–265.
44.
FerwerdaBYangESchedlM, et al (2019) Personality and taxonomy preferences, and the influence of category choice on the user experience for music streaming services. Multimedia Tools and Applications78(14): 20157–20190.
45.
FlewTLinF (2022) The third way of global Internet governance: a dialogue with Terry Flew. Communication and the Public7(3): 121–129.
46.
FlewTMartinF (2022) Digital Platform Regulation: Global Perspectives on Internet Governance. Cham: Palgrave MacMillan.
47.
FlewTMartinFSuzorN (2019) Internet regulation as media policy: rethinking the question of digital communication platform governance. Journal of Digital Media & Policy10(1): 33–50.
48.
FradeJLHde OliveiraJHCGiraldiJME (2021) Advertising in streaming video: an integrative literature review and research agenda. Telecommunications Policy45(9): 102186.
49.
GallenCPantin-SohierGPeyrat-GuillardD (2019) Les mécanismes cognitifs d’acceptation d’une innovation alimentaire de discontinuité : le cas des insectes en France. Recherche et Applications en Marketing34(1): 50–77.
50.
García LeivaMTAlbornozLA (2021) VOD service providers and regulation in the European Union: an audiovisual diversity approach. International Journal of Cultural Policy27(3): 267–281.
51.
GendlinET (1962) Experiencing and the Creation of Meaning. New York: Free Press of Glencoe, Macmillan.
52.
GendlinET (1991) Thinking beyond patterns: body, language, and situations. In: den OudenBMoenM (éds) The Presence of Feeling in Thought. New York: Peter Lang, 21–151.
53.
GendlinET (1992) The wider role of bodily sense in thought and language. In: SheetsM (éd) Giving the Body its Due. Albany: Suny Press, 192–207.
54.
GilliotteQPasquierD (2024) Travailler à sa chaîne : Les vidéastes des plateformes face à leurs sources de revenus. Réseaux246–247(4–5): 89–126.
55.
GlevarecH (2021) L’expérience culturelle: catégories, caractéristiques et conditions des pratiques en régime d’abondance culturelle. Lormont: Le Bord de l’eau.
56.
GutmanJ (1982) A means-end chain model based on consumer categorization processes. Journal of Marketing46(2): 60–72.
57.
GutzeitJDorschIStockWG (2021) Information behavior on video on demand services: user motives and their selection criteria for content. Information12(4): 173.
58.
HabesM (2019) The influence of personal motivation on using social TV: a uses and gratifications approach. International Journal of Information Technology and Language Studies3(1): 32–39.
59.
Haddad-BacryS (2022) L’offre et le choix de consommation culturelle : de la catégorisation à l’accessibilité des offres. Thèse de doctorat: Université Paris 1-Panthéon Sorbonne.
60.
Haddad-BacrySMichelG (2023) Rethinking cultural consumption through the lens of categorization. Carnets de la Consommation10(3): 1–17.
61.
HaridakisPHansonG (2009) Social interaction and co-viewing with YouTube: blending mass communication reception and social connection. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media53(2): 317–335.
62.
HigginsETKingGAMavinGH (1982) Individual construct accessibility and subjective impressions and recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology43(1): 35–47.
63.
HracsBJWebsterJ (2021) From selling songs to engineering experiences: exploring the competitive strategies of music streaming platforms. Journal of Cultural Economy14(2): 240–257.
64.
HuMZhangMWangY (2017) Why do audiences choose to keep watching on live video streaming platforms? An explanation of dual identification framework. Computers in Human Behavior75: 594–606.
65.
HuangMZhanMHuangR, et al (2023) How commuting time influences hedonic consumption: the role of perceived stress. Journal of Consumer Behaviour22(2): 439–454.
66.
IngaraoA (2006) La théorie de la catégorisation : un concept de psychologie cognitive en marketing. Cahiers du Cermat19: 129–145.
67.
JacobEK (2004) Classification and categorization: a difference that makes a difference. Library Trends52(3): 515–540.
68.
JanssonJHracsBJ (2018) Conceptualizing curation in the age of abundance: the case of recorded music. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space50(8): 1602–1625.
69.
JennerM (2018) Netflix and the Re-invention of Television. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
70.
JohnsonC (2019) Online TV. New York: Routledge.
71.
JohnsonD (2022) From Networks to Netflix. A Guide to Changing Channels. New York: Routledge
72.
KatzEBlumlerJGurevitchM (1973) Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly37(4): 509–523.
73.
KhanML (2017) Social media engagement: what motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube?Computers in Human Behavior66: 236–247.
74.
KhareAChowdhuryTG (2015) Food categorization flexibility increases the preference for indulgent foods. Journal of Consumer Psychology25(4): 546–560.
75.
KoflerC (2015) User Intent In Online Video Search. Thèse de doctorat: Delft University, Pays-Bas.
76.
KoflerCLarsonMHanjalicA (2016) User intent in multimedia search: a survey of the state of the art and future challenges. ACM Computing Surveys49(2): 1–37.
77.
KomatsuLK (1992) Recent views of conceptual structure. Psychological Bulletin112(3): 500–526.
78.
KuriakoseMNagasubramaniyanG (2024) Beyond pleasure, desire for meaningful consumption and peacefulness from digital entertainment platforms; extending utaut2 model with eudemonic motivation and tranquility. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction41(1): 1–15.
79.
LadweinR (1994) Le jugement de typicalité dans l’évaluation de l’extension de marque. Recherche et Applications en Marketing9(2): 1–18.
80.
LadweinR (1995) Catégories cognitives et jugement de typicalité en comportement du consommateur. Recherche et Applications en Marketing10(2): 89–100.
81.
LadweinR (1998) Stratégies de marques et concepts de marques. Décisions Marketing13(janvier-avril): 17–24.
82.
LakoffG (1987) Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
83.
LakoffGJohnsonM (1999) Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
84.
LearyM (2012) Introduction to Behavioral Research Methods. Boston: Pearson.
85.
LimHKumarA (2019) Variations in consumers’ use of brand online social networking: a uses and gratifications approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services51: 450–457.
86.
LimperosAHermanA (2024) Uses and Gratifications Theory. In: BowmanN (ed) Entertainment Media and Communication. Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 149–162.
87.
LinJSChenKJSungY (2018) Understanding the nature, uses, and gratifications of social television: implications for developing viewer engagement and network loyalty. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media62(1): 1–20.
88.
LiuXShiSWTeixeiraT, et al (2018) Video content marketing: the making of clips. Journal of Marketing82(4): 86–101.
89.
LobatoRDouglasJScarlataA, et al (2024) Cultural policy between television and digital platforms: the case of SVOD regulation in Australia. International Journal of Cultural Policy30(1): 1–16.
90.
LokenBWardJ (1990) Alternative approaches to understanding the determinants of typicality. Journal of Consumer Research17(2): 111–126.
91.
LorinceJ (2016) Consumption of Content on the Web: An Ecologically Inspired Perspective. Thèse de doctorat: Indiana University Bloomington.
92.
LuHHChenCFTaiYW (2024) Exploring the roles of vlogger characteristics and video attributes on followers’ value perceptions and behavioral intention. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services77: 103686.
93.
MatrixS (2014) The Netflix effect: Teens, binge watching, and on-demand digital media trends. Jeunesse: young people, texts, cultures6(1): 119–138.
94.
MazzoliEM (2023) The Politics of Content Prioritisation Online Governing Prominence and Discoverability on Digital Media Platforms. Thèse de doctorat: London School of Economics and Political Science.
95.
MazzoliEMTambiniD (2020) Prioritisation uncovered: The discoverability of public interest content online. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Study. 64p.
96.
MedinDLSchafferMM (1978) Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review85(3): 207–238.
97.
MenonD (2022) Purchase and continuation intentions of over-the-top (OTT) video streaming platform subscriptions: a uses and gratification theory perspective. Telematics and Informatics Reports5(100006): 1–15.
98.
MerceronAAtkinD (2020) Examining the role of individual differences & motivation in predicting social TV viewing behaviors among young adults in the US. The Journal of Social Media in Society9(1): 253–274.
99.
MerseyRMalthouseECalderB (2010) Engagement with online media. Journal of Media Business Studies7(2): 39–56.
100.
MervisCBRoschE (1981) Categorization of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology32(1): 89–115.
101.
MiyauchiKSugaharaTOdaH (2009) Relax or study? A qualitative user study on the usage of live mobile TV and mobile video. Computers in Entertainment7(3): 1–20.
102.
MoreauCPMarkmanALehmannDL (2001) What is it? Categorization flexibility and consumers responses to really new products. Journal of Consumer Research27(4): 489–498.
103.
NandaAPBanerjeeR (2020) Binge watching: an exploration of the role of technology. Psychology & Marketing37(9): 1212–1230.
104.
NguyenSPMurphyGL (2003) An apple is more than just a fruit: Cross-classification in children’s concepts. Child Development74(6): 1783–1806.
105.
NieborgDBPoellT (2018) The platformization of cultural production: theorizing the contingent cultural commodity. New Media & Society20(11): 4275–4292.
106.
NosofskyRM (1986) Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology115(1): 39–57.
107.
O’GuinnTCShrumLJ (1997) The role of television in the construction of consumer reality. Journal of Consumer Research23(4): 278–294.
108.
OshersonDNSmithEE (1981) On the adequacy of prototype theory as a theory of concepts. Cognition9(1): 35–58.
109.
PeukertC (2019) The next wave of digital technological change and the cultural industries. Journal of Cultural Economics43(2): 189–210.
110.
PoellTNieborgDBDuffyBE (2021) Platforms and Cultural Production. Cambridge: Polity Press.
111.
QianTYMatzRLuoL, et al (2022) Gamification for value creation and viewer engagement in gamified livestreaming services: The moderating role of gender in esports. Journal of Business Research145: 482–494.
112.
RangaswamyAMochNFeltenC, et al (2020) The role of marketing in digital business platforms. Journal of Interactive Marketing51(1): 72–90.
113.
RatneshwarSBarsalouLWPechmannC, et al (2001) Goal-derived categories: the role of personal and situational goals in category representations. Journal of Consumer Psychology10(3): 147–157.
114.
RatneshwarSPechmannCShockerAD (1996) Goal-derived categories and the antecedents of across-category consideration. Journal of Consumer Research23(3): 240–250.
115.
RatneshwarSShockerAD (1991) Substitution in use and the role of usage context in product category structures. Journal of Marketing Research28(3): 281–295.
116.
RebillardFNoûsC (2021) L’industrie de la télévision. Chronique d’une fragmentation-recomposition. Réseaux6(230): 9–35.
117.
ReedSK (1972) Pattern recognition and categorization. Cognitive Psychology3(3): 382–407.
118.
RennieDLFergusKD (2006) Embodied categorizing in the grounded theory method: methodical hermeneutics in action. Theory & Psychology16(4): 483–503.
RoschE (1978) Principles of categorization. In: RoschELloydBB (éds) Cognition and Categorization, Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 27–48.
122.
RoschEMervisCB (1975) Family resemblances: studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology7(4): 573–605.
123.
RossBHMurphyGL (1999) Food for thought: cross-classification and category organization in a complex real-world domain. Cognitive Psychology38(4): 495–553.
124.
SaxbeDGraeschAAlvikM (2011) Television as a social or solo activity: understanding families’ everyday television viewing patterns. Communication Research Reports28(2): 180–189.
125.
SchauerteRFeiereisenSMalterAJ (2021) What does it take to survive in a digital world? Resource-based theory and strategic change in the TV industry. Journal of Cultural Economics45(2): 263–293.
126.
ScheibehenneBGreifenederRToddPM (2010) Can there ever be too many options? A meta-analytic review of choice overload. Journal of Consumer Research37(3): 409–425.
127.
SchweidelDAMoeWW (2016) Binge watching and advertising. Journal of Marketing80(5): 1–19.
128.
SégurC (2022) Un tournant participatif dans le monde de la télévision ?Études de communication59: 197–217.
129.
ShaftoPKempCMansinghkaV, et al (2011) A probabilistic model of cross- categorization. Cognition120(1): 1–25.
130.
ShahbaznezhadHDolanRRashidiradM (2021) The role of social media content format and platform in users’ engagement behavior. Journal of Interactive Marketing53(1): 47–65.
131.
ShapiroS (2020) Algorithmic television in the age of large-scale customization. Television & New Media21(6): 658–663.
132.
SharifMAWoolleyK (2020) The effect of categorization on goal progress perceptions and motivation. Journal of Consumer Research47(4): 608–630.
133.
SimonsonINowlisSM (2000) The role of explanations and need for uniqueness in consumer decision making: unconventional choices based on reasons. Journal of Consumer Research27(1): 49–68.
134.
SjöblomMHamariJ (2017) Why do people watch others play video games? An empirical study on the motivations of Twitch users. Computers in Human Behavior75: 985–996.
135.
SmithEEMedinDL (1981) Categories and Concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
136.
SnickarsPVonderauP (2009) The YouTube Reader. Stockholm: National Library of Sweden.
137.
SonnacN (2023) Le nouveau monde des médias: une urgence démocratique. Paris: Odile Jacob.
138.
SteinerEXuK (2020) Binge-watching motivates change: uses and gratifications of streaming video viewers challenge traditional TV research. Convergence26(1): 82–101.
139.
SundarSLimperosA (2013) Uses and grats 2.0: New gratifications for new media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media57(4): 504–525.
140.
SzaboGHubermanBA (2010) Predicting the popularity of online content. Communications of the ACM53(8): 80–88.
141.
SzpirglasM (2023) Comprendre le management avec La Casa de Papel. Caen: Éditions EMS.
142.
TefertillerASheehanK (2019) TV in the streaming age: motivations, behaviors, and satisfaction of post-network television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media63(4): 595–616.
143.
TellisGJMacInnisDJTirunillaiS, et al (2019) What drives virality (sharing) of online digital content? The critical role of information, emotion, and brand prominence. Journal of Marketing83(4): 1–20.
144.
TverskyA (1977) Features of similarity. Psychological Review84(4): 327–352.
145.
Vallée-TourangeauFAnthonySHAustinNG (1998) Strategies for generating multiple instances of common and ad hoc categories. Memory6(5): 555–592.
146.
WiddicksKHazasMBatesO, et al (2019) Streaming, multi-screens and YouTube: the new (unsustainable) ways of watching in the home. 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Glasgow, 4–9 mai.
147.
WongCHTanGWHHewTS, et al (2016) Can mobile TV be a new revolution in the television industry?Computers in Human Behavior55: 764–776.
148.
WoolleyKSharifMA (2022) Down a rabbit hole: how prior media consumption shapes subsequent media consumption. Journal of Marketing Research59(3): 453–471.
149.
YanHChangE-CChouT-J, et al (2015) The over-categorization effect: how the number of categorizations influences shoppers’ perceptions of variety and satisfaction. Journal of Business Research68(3): 631–638.
150.
YunJTDuffBR (2017) Is utilizing themes an effective scheme? Choice overload and categorization effects within an extensive online choice environment. Computers in Human Behavior74: 205–214.
151.
ZhouYCalderBJMalthouseECHessaryYK (2022) Not all clicks are equal: detecting engagement with digital content. Journal of Media Business Studies19(2): 90–107.
