La perception d’une contagion physique négative a été identifiée dans la littérature comme un frein à l’achat de produits d’occasion dans un contexte hors ligne. Compte tenu du développement de l’achat d’occasion sur Internet, cet article étudie l’effet de la saillance du contact entre le propriétaire précédent et le produit sur l’achat de produits d’occasion en ligne. Une première expérimentation montre un effet de contagion physique négative sur l’intention d’achat, effet médiatisé par le risque perçu physique. Or, de nombreux acteurs de l’occasion sur Internet adoptent des stratégies de présentation visant à accentuer la similitude avec le neuf. Une deuxième expérimentation montre que la similitude avec un produit neuf permet de réduire ce risque perçu physique pour les individus non-experts de la catégorie de produits, tandis qu’elle dégrade la qualité perçue pour les experts. Dans les deux expérimentations menées, l’effet du dégoût, qui joue un rôle important dans les circuits de distribution physiques, s’avère non significatif.
AbbeyJDMeloyMGGuideVDRAtalayS (2015) Remanufactured products in closed loop supply chains for consumer goods. Production and Operations Management24(3): 488–503.
2.
Abdul-GhaniEHydeKFMarshallR (2011) Emic and etic interpretations of engagement with a consumer-to-consumer online auction site. Journal of Business Research64(10): 1060–1066.
3.
AdamsTGCislerJMBradyRELohrJMOlatunjiBO (2013) Preliminary psychometric evidence for distinct affective and cognitive mechanism mediating contamination aversion. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment35(3): 375–388.
4.
AckermanDHuJ (2017) Assuring me that it is as ‘Good as New’ just makes me think about how someone else used it. Examining consumer reaction toward marketer-provided information about second hand goods. Journal of Consumer Behaviour16(3): 233–241.
5.
AgarwalSTeasRK (2001) Perceived value: mediating role of perceived risk. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice9(4): 1–14.
6.
AkerlofGA (1970) The market for "Lemons": quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics84(3): 488–500.
7.
AlbaJWLynchJWeitzBJaniswerskiCLutzRSawyerAWoodS (1997) Interactive home-shopping: Consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces. Journal of Marketing61(3): 38–53.
8.
AlbaJWHutchinsonJW (1987) Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research13(4): 411–454.
9.
AndersonJZahafM (2007) Profiling consumer-to-consumer and business-to-consumer buyers: who buys what?International Journal of Business Research7(6): 85–99.
10.
ArgoJJDahlDWMoralesAC (2006) Consumer contamination: How consumers react to products touched by others. Journal of Marketing70(2): 81–94.
11.
ArielyDSimonsonI (2003) Buying, Bidding, Playing, or Competing? Value assessment and decision dynamics in online auctions. Journal of Consumer Psychology13(1): 113–123.
12.
AyadiN (2010) L’expérience de prise de risque par les consommateurs : rôle des émotions anticipées positives. Recherche et Applications en Marketing25(2): 31–49.
13.
BardhiFEckhardtGM (2012) Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing. Journal of Consumer Research39(4): 881–898.
14.
BaronRKennyD (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinctive in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51(6): 1173–1182.
15.
BauerR (1960) Consumer Behavior as Risk Taking, Dynamic Marketing for a Changing World, éd. HancockRS. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 389–398.
16.
BelkRWSherryJFWallendorfM (1988) A naturalistic inquiry into buyer and seller behavior at a swap meet. Journal of Consumer Research14(4): 449–470.
17.
Benoit-MoreauFLarceneuxFParguelB (2010) La communication sociétale : entre opportunités et risques d’opportunisme. Décisions Marketing59: 75–78.
18.
BettmanJRParkCW (1980) Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of choice process on consumer decision processes: A protocol analysis. Journal of Consumer Research7(4): 234–248.
19.
BezançonM (2012) Pourquoi les consommateurs n’achètent-ils pas d’occasion ? Une analyse exploratoire. Actes du 28ème Congrès International de l’Association Française du Marketing, Mai, Brest, France.
20.
BiswasDBiswasA (2004) The diagnostic role of signals in the context of perceived risks in online shopping: do signals matter more on the Web?Journal of Interactive Marketing18(3): 30–45.
21.
BotsmanRRogersR (2010) What’s Mine Is Yours: The Rise of Collaborative Consumption. New York: Harper Collins.
22.
CadarioRParguelB (2014) Reconsidérer la discrétisation des variables quantitatives : vers une nouvelle analyse de modération dans la recherche expérimentale. Recherche et Applications en Marketing29(4): 1–18.
23.
CameronDDGallowayA (2005) Consumer motivations and concerns in online auctions: an exploratory study. International Journal of Consumer Studies29(3): 181–192.
24.
CastroIAMoralesACNowlisSM (2013) The influence of disorganized shelf displays and limited product quantity on consumer purchase. Journal of Marketing77(4): 118–133.
25.
ChakravartiDGreenleafESinhaACheemaACoxJCFriedmanDHoTHIsaacRMMitchellAARapoportARothkopfMHSrivastavaJZwickR (2002) Auctions: research opportunities in marketing. Marketing Letters13(3): 281–296.
26.
ChaudhuriA (1997) Consumption emotion and perceived risk: a macro-analytic approach. Journal of Business Research39(2): 81–92.
27.
ChaudhuriA (1998) Product class effects on perceived risk: the role of emotion. International Journal of Research in Marketing15(2): 157–168.
28.
ChaudhuriA (2002) A study of emotion and reason in products and services. Journal of Consumer Behaviour1(3): 267–279.
29.
ChenZDubinskyAJ (2003) A conceptual model of perceived customer value in e-commerce: a preliminary investigation. Psychology & Marketing20(4): 323–347.
30.
CislerJMAdamsTGBradyREBridgesAJLohrJMOlatunjiBO (2011) Unique affective and cognitive processes in contamination appraisals: implications for contamination fear. Journal of Anxiety Disorders25(1): 28–35.
31.
CuiXLaiVSLiuCKW (2008) Research on consumer behaviour in online auctions: insights from a critical literature review. Electronic Markets18(4): 345–361.
32.
DehlingA (2013) La mise en soi de l’objet de l’Autre, des concepts de possessions et d’appropriation dans le contexte de la consommation d’occasion. Thèse de doctorat en sciences sociales: École des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris.
33.
Di MuroFNoseworthyTJ (2013) Money isn’t everything but it helps if it doesn’t look used: how the physical appearance of money influences spending. Journal of Consumer Research39(6): 1330–42.
34.
DoleacJSteinL (2012) The visible hand: race and online market outcomes. Economic Journal123(572): 469–492.
35.
DonthuNGarciaA (1999) The Internet shopper. Journal of Advertising Research39(3): 52–58.
36.
ElderSEKrishnaA (2012) The “Visual Depiction Effect” in advertising: facilitating embodied mental simulation through product orientation. Journal of Consumer Research38(2): 988–1003.
37.
ErtzM (2015) Du Web 2.0 à la seconde vie des objets. Le rôle de la technologie Internet. San Francisco: Grin Publishing.
38.
FlynnLRGoldsmithRE (1999) A short, reliable measure of subjective knowledge. Journal of Business Research46(1): 57–66.
39.
ForsytheSShiB (2003) Consumer patronage and risk perceptions in Internet shopping. Journal of Business Research56(11): 867–875.
40.
FrazerJG (1890/1959) The New Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion. New York: Macmillan.
41.
GabbottM (1991) The role of product cues in assessing risk in second-hand markets. European Journal of Marketing25(9): 38–50.
42.
GerstnerE (1985) Do higher prices signal higher quality?Journal of Marketing Research22(2): 209–215.
43.
GhoseA (2009) Internet exchanges for used goods: an empirical analysis of trade patterns and adverse selection. MIS Quarterly33(2): 263–291.
44.
GhoseASmithMDTelangR (2006) Internet exchanges for used books: an empirical analysis of product cannibalization and welfare impact. Information Systems Research17(1): 3–19.
45.
GilSRoussetSDroit-VoletS (2009) How liked and disliked foods affect time perception. Emotion9(4): 457–463.
46.
GoukensCDewitteSPandalaereMWarlopL (2007) Wanting a bit(e) of everything: extending the valuation effect to variety seeking. Journal of Consumer Research34(3): 386–394.
47.
GreggDWalsackS (2008) Dressing your online auction business for success: an experiment comparing two e-Bay businesses. MIS Quarterly32(3): 653–670.
GrewalDGotliebJMarmorsteinH (1998) The moderating effects of message framing and source credibility on the price-perceived risk relationship. Journal of Consumer Research21(1): 145–153.
50.
GuiotDRouxD (2010) A second-hand shoppers’ motivation scale: antecedents, consequences and implications for retailers. Journal of Retailing86(4): 383–399.
51.
HaidtJMcCauleyCRozinP (1994) Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors. Personality and Individual Differences16: 701–713.
HairJFBlackWCBabinBJAndersonRE (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis. Harlow: Pearson.
54.
HayesAF (2013) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-based Approach. First edition. New York: The Guilford Press.
55.
HayesAF (2018) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-based Approach. Second edition. New York: The Guilford Press.
56.
van der HeijdenHVerhagenT (2004) Online store image: conceptual foundations and empirical measurement. Information & Management41(5): 609–617.
57.
Helme-GuizonA (2001) Le comportement du consommateur sur un site marchand est-il fondamentalement différent de son comportement en magasin ? Proposition d’un cadre d’appréhension de ses spécificités. Recherche et Applications en Marketing16(3): 25–38.
58.
HodsonGCostelloK (2007) Interpersonal disgust, ideological orientations, and dehumanization as predictors of intergroup attitudes. Psychological Science18(8): 691–698.
59.
HuangJYAckermanJMNewmanGE (2017) Catching (up with) magical contagion: a review of contagion effects in consumer contexts. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research2(4): 430–443.
60.
JacobyJKaplanL (1972) The components of perceived risk. Advances in Consumer Research3(3): 287–291.
61.
KalwaniMUSilkAJ (1982) On the reliability of predictive validity of purchase intention measures. Marketing Science1(3): 243–286.
62.
KapitanSBhargaveR (2013) Navigating residue sensitivity in the used goods marketplace. Psychology & Marketing30(4): 305–317.
63.
KaplanLSzybilloGJJacobyJ (1974) Components of perceived risk in product purchase: a cross validation. Journal of Applied Psychology59(3): 287–291.
64.
KauffmanRJWoodCA (2006) Doing their bidding: an empirical examination of factors that affect a buyer’s utility in Internet auctions. Information Technology and Management7(3): 171–190.
65.
KehHTPangJ (2010) Customer reactions to service separation. Journal of Marketing74(2): 55–70.
66.
KimJ (2017) The ownership distance effect: the impact of traces left by previous owners on the evaluation of used goods. Marketing Letters28(4): 591–605.
67.
KimJKardesFRHerrPM (1991) Consumer expertise and the vividness effect: implications for judgment and inference. Advances in Consumer Research18: 90–93.
68.
KwonWSLennonSJ (2009) What induces online loyalty? Online versus offline brand images. Journal of Business Research62(5): 557–564.
69.
LaiMWuWWinS (2008) A qualitative approach for conceptualizing consumer decision-making in online auctions. Advances in Consumer Research35: 319–324.
70.
LiSSrinivasanKSunB (2009) Internet auction features as quality signals. Journal of Marketing73(1), 75–92.
71.
LombartC (2004) Le butinage : proposition d’une échelle de mesure. Recherche et Applications en Marketing19(2): 1–30.
72.
MaheswaranDMackieDMChaikenS (1992) Brand name as a heuristic cue: the effects of task importance and expectancy confirmation on consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Psychology1(4): 317–336.
73.
MaheswaranD (1994) Country of origin as a stereotype: effects of consumer expertise and attribute strength on product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research21(2): 354–365.
74.
MaheswaranDSternthalB (1990) The effects of knowledge, motivation, and type of message on ad processing and product judgments. Journal of Consumer Research17(1): 66–73.
75.
MaussM (1902/1950) Théorie générale de la magie. In: Mauss MSociologie et anthropologie. Paris: PUF.
76.
McKayDTsaoSD (2005) A treatment most foul: handling disgust in cognitive-behavior therapy. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy19(4): 355–367.
77.
MerleA (2007) La valeur perçue de la customisation de masse : proposition et test d’un modèle conceptuel intégrateur. Thèse de doctorat en sciences de gestion: CERGAM, Université Paul-Cézanne (Aix-Marseille III, IAE).
78.
MoralesACFitzsimmonsGJ (2007) Product contagion: changing consumer evaluations through physical contact with “disgusting” products. Journal of Marketing Research44(2): 272–283.
79.
MoretzMWMckayD (2008) Disgust sensitivity as a predictor of obsessive-compulsive contamination sympotoms and associated cognitions. Journal of Anxiety Disorders22(4): 707–715.
80.
NemeroffCRozinP (1994) The contagion concept in adult thinking in the United States: transmission of germs and of interpersonal influence. Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology22(2): 158–186.
81.
OlatunjiBOSawchukCNLohrJMde JongPJ (2004) Disgust domains in the prediction of contamination fear. Behaviour Research and Therapy42(1): 93–104.
82.
OlatunjiBOWilliamsNLTolinDFAbramowitzJSSawchuckCNLohrJMElwoodLS (2007) The disgust scale: item analysis, factor structure, and suggestions for refinement. Psychological Assessment19(3): 281–297.
83.
O’ReillyLRuckerMHughesRGorangMHandS (1984) The relationship of psychological and situational variables to usage of a second-order marketing system. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science12(3): 53–76.
84.
OrthURCampanaDMalkewitzK (2014) Formation of consumer price expectation based on Package design: attractive and quality routes. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice18(1): 23–40.
85.
PantojaFBakpayevMRossiPYoonS (2016) Old, but gold! The role of aging stereotypes on consumer’s purchase intentions in second-hand marketplaces. Advances in Consumer Research44: 580–581.
86.
PreacherKJHayesAF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods40(3): 879–891.
87.
RachmanS (2006) Fear of contamination: Assessment and treatment. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
88.
RafaeliSNNoyA (2002) Online auctions, messaging, communication and social facilitation: a simulation and experimental evidence. European Journal of Information System11(3): 196–207.
89.
RajuPSSubhashCLonialWMangoldG (1995) Differential effects of subjective knowledge, objective knowledge, and usage experience on decision making: an exploratory investigation. Journal of Consumer Psychology4(2): 153–180.
90.
RaoARMonroeKB (1989) The effect of price, brand name, and store name on buyers’ perceptions of product quality: an integrative review. Journal of Marketing Research36(3): 351–57.
91.
Reynolds-McIlnayRMorrinMNordfältJ (2017) How product-environment brightness contrast and product disarray impact consumer choice in retail environments. Journal of Retailing93(3): 266–282.
92.
RieunierS (2000) L’influence de la musique d’ambiance sur le comportement du consommateur sur le lieu de vente. Thèse de doctorat en sciences de gestion: DMSP, Université Paris IX-Dauphine.
93.
RoseliusT (1971) Consumer rankings of risk reduction methods. Journal of Marketing35(1): 56–61.
94.
RouxD (2004a) Les orientations envers l’achat d’occasion, le rôle du risque perçu et de l’expertise : Quelles implications pour la distribution?Décisions Marketing35: 9–21.
95.
RouxD (2004b) Buying second hand clothes: an exploratory approach using differences in consumers’ disgust sensitivity. Actes du 33ème congrès de l’EMAC (European Marketing Academy), Murcia.
96.
RouxDGuiotD (2008) Une mesure des motivations envers l’achat d’occasion, leurs antecedents et leurs consequences. Recherche et Applications en Marketing23(4): 63–95.
97.
RouxDKorchiaM (2006) Am I what I wear? An exploratory study of symbolic meanings associated with secondhand clothing. Advances in Consumer Research33(1): 29–35.
RozinPHaidtJMcCauleyCR (2000) Disgust. In: Lewis M et Haviland-Jones JM (éds)Handbook of Emotions. 2ème édn, New York: Guilford Press, 637–653.
100.
RozinPMillmanLNemeroffC (1986) Operation of the laws of sympathetic magic in disgust and other domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology50(4): 703–712.
101.
RozinPNemeroffC (2002) Sympathetic magical thinking: the contagion and similarity heuristics. In: GilovichTGriffinDKahnemanDHeuristics and Biases. The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 201–216.
102.
SherryJF (1990) A sociocultural analysis of a midwestern american flea market. Journal of Consumer Research17(1): 13–30.
103.
SinghSRatchfordBTPrasadA (2014) Offline and online search in used durables markets. Journal of Retailing90(3): 301–320.
104.
SrivastavaJMitraA (1998) Warranty as a signal of quality: the moderating effect of consumer knowledge on quality evaluations. Marketing Letters9(4): 327–336.
105.
SolomonMR (2008) Consumer Behavior: Buying, Having and Being. 8ème edn, New York: Prentice Hall.
106.
SpillerSAFitzsimonsGJLynchJGMcClellandGH (2013) Spotlights, floodlights and the magic number zero: simple effects tests in moderated regression. Journal of Marketing Research50(2): 277–288.
107.
StrazzieriA (1994) Mesurer l’implication durable indépendamment du risque perçu. Recherche et Applications en Marketing9(1): 73–91.
108.
StoneRNGrönhaugK (1993) Perceived risk: further considerations for the marketing discipline. European Journal of Marketing27(3): 39–50.
109.
SuwelackTHogreveJHoyerWD (2011) Understanding money-back guarantees: cognitive, affective, and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Retailing87(4): 462–478.
110.
TanSJ (1999) Strategies for reducing consumers’ risk aversion in Internet shopping. Journal of Consumer Marketing16(2): 163–180.
111.
TylorEB (1871/1974), Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art and Custom. New York: Gordon Press.
112.
VolleP (1995) Le concept de risque perçu en psychologie du consommateur : antécédents et statut théorique. Recherche et Applications en Marketing10(1): 39–56.
113.
WalczakSGreggDGBerrenbergJL (2006) Market decision making for online auction sellers: profit maximization or socialization. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research7(4): 199–220.
114.
WangKWangETGTaiCF (2002) A study of online auction sites in Taiwan: product, auction rule, and trading type. International Journal of Information Management22(2): 127–142.
115.
WarnierJ-P (1999) Construire la culture matérielle. L’homme qui pensait avec ses doigts. Paris: PUF.
116.
WeverRDel CastilloCA (2006) Thinking out of the box; the unpacking experience of consumer electronics products. Actes de la 15 ème conférence IAPRI World Conference on Packaging, Tokyo, 136–140.
117.
WhiteKLinLDahlDWRitchieRJ (2016) When do consumers avoid imperfections? Superficial packaging damage as a contamination cue. Journal of Marketing Research53(1): 110–123.
118.
WiedmannK-PHennigsNPankallaLKassubekMSeegebarthB (2011) Adoption barriers and resistance to sustainable solutions in the automotive sector. Journal of Business Research64(11): 1201–1206.
119.
WolfinbargerMGillyMC (2001) Shopping online for freedom, control, and fun. California Management Review43(2): 34–55.
