Afin de mieux comprendre le comportement du consommateur lors des premières phases d’interaction avec un nouveau produit, un modèle de formation de la valeur perçue d’une innovation est proposé et testé. L’étude quantitative, menée dans le secteur automobile auprès de 828 individus, démontre qu’en amont du processus d’adoption, la valeur perçue d’une nouveauté est seulement influencée par ses bénéfices perçus mais n’est pas affectée par ses sacrifices perçus. De même, les variables individuelles n’influencent pas directement la valeur perçue mais seulement les caractéristiques perçues du nouveau bien.
AckermannCLMathieuJPRoehrichG (2012) Un enrichissement du processus de décision d’adoption d’une innovation par la prise en compte de l’attitude implicite. Actes du 11th International Congress Marketing Trends, Venise, actes électroniques.
2.
AgarwalSTeasRK (2002) Cross-national applicability of a perceived quality model. Journal of Product and Brand Management11(4): 213–236.
3.
AmraouiL (2005) Les effets du prix, de l’image du point de vente et du capital de marque sur la valeur perçue des produits. Thèse de doctorat en sciences de gestion: Université des Sciences Sociales de Toulouse.
4.
AurierPEvrardYN’GoalaG (2004) Comprendre et mesurer la valeur du point de vue du consommateur. Recherche et Applications en Marketing19(3): 1–20.
5.
BaudrillardJ (1972) Pour une critique de l’économie politique du signe. Paris: Gallimard.
6.
BeiLTHeslinR (1997) The consumer reports mindset: who seeks value – the involved or the knowledgeable?Advances in Consumer Research24(1): 151–158.
7.
Béji-BécheurAGolletyM (2007) Lead user et leader d’opinion: deux cibles majeures au service de l’innovation. Décisions Marketing48, 21–34.
8.
Ben Miled-ChérifH (2001) L’implication du consommateur et ses perspectives stratégiques. Recherche et Applications en Marketing16(1): 65–85.
9.
BoltonRNDrewJH (1991) A multistage model of customers’ assessments of service quality and value. Journal of Consumer Research17(4): 375–384.
10.
BrunerGCKumarA (2005) Explaining consumer acceptance of handheld internet devices. Journal of Business Research58(5): 553–558.
11.
CestreG (1996) Diffusion et innovativité : définition, modélisation et mesure. Recherche et Applications en Marketing11(1): 70–88.
12.
ChangCT (2007) Health-care product advertising: the influences of message framing and perceived product characteristics. Psychology & Marketing24(2): 143–169.
13.
ChangCDibbS (2012) Reviewing and conceptualising customer-perceived value. The Marketing Review12(3): 253–274.
14.
CroninJJBradyMKHultGTM (2000) Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. Journal of Retailing76(2): 193–218.
15.
DardisFEShenF (2008) The influence of evidence type and product involvement on message-framing effects in advertising. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 7, 3, 222–238.
16.
DebreuG (1959) Theory of value: an axiomatic analysis of economic equilibrium. London: Yale University Press.
17.
DuboisN (1999) Valeur, in BlochHChemamaRDépretE. (éd.), Grand dictionnaire de la psychologie. Paris: Larousse, 923–924.
18.
FeertchakH (1996) Les motivations et les valeurs en psycho-sociologie. Paris: Armand Colin.
19.
FilserM (1994) Le comportement du consommateur. Paris: Dalloz.
20.
FrondiziR (1971) What is value? An introduction to axiology. 2ème édition, La Salle, IL: Open Court Publishing Company.
21.
GaoTTLeichterGWeiYS (2012) Countervailing effects of value and risk perceptions in manufacturers’ adoption of expensive, discontinuous innovations. Industrial Marketing Management41(4): 659–668.
22.
GatignonHRobertsonTS (1985) A propositional inventory for new diffusion research. Journal of Consumer Research11(4): 849–867.
23.
GatignonHRobertsonTS (1991) Innovative decision processes. In RobertsonTSKassarjianHH (éd.), Handbook of consumer behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 316–348.
24.
GoldsmithREHofackerCF (1991) Measuring consumer innovativeness. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science19(3): 209–222.
25.
GoldsmithRENewellSJ (1997) Innovativeness and price sensitivity: managerial, theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of Product and Brand Management6(3): 163–174.
HamelinJ (2002) La formation du prix de référence futur: déterminants et effets temporels. Une application au contexte de baisse des prix. Thèse de doctorat en sciences de gestion: Université François Rabelais de Tours.
28.
HoffmannJRoehrichGMathieuJ-P (2006a) Le rôle de l’anticipation d’usage et de l’intention d’usage dans l’évaluation d’un nouveau produit. Actes du 22ème Congrès International de l’Association Française du Marketing. Nantes, actes électroniques.
29.
HoffmannJRoehrichGMathieuJ-P (2006b) Le rôle médiateur de l’intention d’usage dans la relation entre l’anticipation des usages et l’intention d’achat d’un nouveau produit. Actes du 5th International Congress Marketing Trends. Venise, actes électroniques.
30.
HolbrookMB (1999) Introduction to consumer value. In MB Holbrook (éd.), Consumer value: a framework for analysis and research. New-York: Routledge, 1–28.
31.
ImSBayusBLMasonCH (2003) An empirical study of innate, consumer innovativeness, personal characteristics, and new-product adoption behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science31(1): 61–73.
32.
JolibertAJourdanP (2006) Marketing research: méthodes de recherche et d’études en marketing. Paris: Dunod.
33.
KahnemanDTverskyA (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica47(2): 263–291.
34.
KimHWChanHCGuptaS (2007) Value-based adoption of mobile Internet: an empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems43(1): 111–126.
35.
KleijnenMde RuyterKWetzelsM (2007) An assessment of value creation in mobile service delivery and the moderating role of time consciousness. Journal of Retailing83(1): 33–46.
36.
KumarAGrisaffeDB (2004) Effects of extrinsic attributes on perceived quality, customer value, and behavioral intentions in B2B settings: a comparison across goods and service industries. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing11(4): 43–74.
37.
LaiAW (1995) Consumer values, product benefits and customer value: a consumption behavior approach. Advances in Consumer Research22(1): 381–388.
38.
LapersonneE (1995) Consideration sets of size one: an empirical investigation of automobile purchases. International Journal of Research in Marketing12(1): 55–66.
LaurentGKapfererJ-N (1986) Les profils d’implication. Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 1, 1, 41–57.
41.
Le LouarnP (1997) La tendance à innover des consommateurs: analyse conceptuelle et proposition d’une échelle de mesure. Recherche et Applications en Marketing12(1): 3–19.
42.
Le Nagard-AssayagEManceauD (2011) Le marketing de l’innovation. 2ème édition, Paris: Dunod.
43.
LevinIPSchneiderSLGaethGJ (1998) All frames are not created equal: a typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes76(2): 149–188.
44.
LibermanNTropeY (1998) The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: a test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology75(1): 5–18.
45.
LichtensteinDRBlochPHBlackWC (1988) Correlates of price acceptability. Journal of Consumer Research135(2): 243–252.
46.
LinCHShihHYSherPJ (2007) Integrating technology readiness into technology acceptance: the TRAM model. Psychology and Marketing24(7): 641–657.
47.
MalhotraNDécaudinJ-MBouguerraA (2007) Etudes marketing avec SPSS. 5ème édition, Paris: Pearson.
MazumdarT (1993) A value-based orientation to new product planning. Journal of Consumer Marketing10(1): 28–41.
50.
MerleA (2007) La valeur perçue de la customisation de masse: proposition et test d’un modèle conceptuel intégrateur. Thèse de doctorat en sciences de gestion: Université Paul Cézanne Aix-Marseille III.
51.
MeyerRJShenghuiZHanJK (2008) Biases in valuation vs. usage of innovative product features. Marketing Science27(6): 1083–1096.
52.
MidgleyDFDowlingGR (1978) Innovativeness: the concept and its measurement. Journal of Consumer Research4(4): 229–242.
53.
MooreGCBenbasatI (1991) Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research2(3): 192–222.
54.
MukherjeeAHoyerWD (2001) The effect of novel attributes on product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research28(3): 462–472.
55.
OstlundLE (1974) Perceived innovation attributes as predictors of innovativeness. Journal of Consumer Research1(2): 23–29.
56.
PageARosenbaumH (1992) Developing an effective concept testing program for consumer durables, Journal of Product Innovation Management9(4): 267–277.
57.
ParaschivCL’HaridonO (2008) Loss aversion: origin, components and marketing implications. Recherche et Applications en Marketing23(2): 67–83.
58.
ParasuramanAGrewalD (2000) The impact of technology on the quality-value-loyalty chain: a research agenda. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science28(1): 168–174.
59.
ParkHLimHKimY-K (2013) Experiential value: application to innovative consumer technology products. Journal of Customer Behaviour12(1): 7–24.
60.
PihlströmMBrushGJ (2008) Comparing the perceived value of information and entertainment mobile services. Psychology & Marketing25(8): 732–755.
61.
Pire-LechalardP (2003) Décollage des produits durables réellement nouveaux: conceptualisation et modélisation. Thèse de doctorat en sciences de gestion: Université de Droit, d’Economie et des Sciences d’Aix-Marseille.
62.
PlouffeCRVandenboschMHullandJ (2001) Intermediating technologies and multi-group adoption: a comparison of consumer and merchant adoption intentions toward a new electronic payment system. Journal of Product Innovation Management18(2): 65–81.
63.
RamirezEGoldsmithRE (2009) Some antecedents of price sensitivity. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice17(3): 199–213.
64.
RivièreAMencarelliR (2012) Vers une clarification théorique de la notion de valeur perçue en marketing. Recherche et Applications en Marketing27(3): 97–123.
65.
RoehrichG (1993) Les consommateurs-innovateurs, un essai d’identification. Thèse de doctorat en sciences de gestion: Université Pierre Mendès-France de Grenoble.
66.
RoehrichG (1994) Innovativités hédoniste et sociale: proposition d’une échelle de mesure. Recherche et Applications en Marketing9(2): 19–42.
67.
RoehrichG (2001) Causes de l’achat d’un nouveau produit : variables individuelles ou caractéristiques perçues. Revue Française du Marketing182(2): 83–98.
68.
RoehrichG (2004) Consumer innovativeness: concepts and measurements. Journal of Business Research57(6): 671–677.
69.
RoehrichGVallette-FlorencePFerrandiJ-M (2002) Comparaison de la validité prédictive de deux conceptualisations de l’innovativité. Actes du 18ème Congrès International de l’Association Française du Marketing. Lille, 295–310.
70.
RogersEM (1983) Diffusion of innovations. 3ème édition, New York: The Free Press.
71.
RogersEM (2003) Diffusion of innovations. 5ème édition, New York: The Free Press.
72.
RothmanAJSaloveyP (1997) Shaping perception to motivate healthy behaviour: the role of message framing. Psychology Bulletin121(1): 3–19.
73.
RousselPDurrieuFCampoyEEl AkremiA (2002) Méthodes d’équations structurelles: recherche et applications en gestion. Paris: Economica.
74.
ShivBEdellJAPayneJW (2004). Does elaboration increase or decrease the effectiveness of negatively versus positively framed messages?Journal of Consumer Research31(1): 199–208.
75.
SmithA (1776) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nation. London: W Strahan & T Cadell.
76.
SmithJBColgateM (2007) Customer value creation: a practical framework. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice15(1): 7–23.
77.
ThompsonDVHamiltonRWRustRT (2005) Feature fatigue: when product capabilities become too much of a good thing. Journal of Marketing Research42(4): 431–442.
78.
TomasetiESiciliaMRuizS (2004) The moderating effect of innate innovativeness on consumer response to symbolic and functional innovations. Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference Proceedings. Wellington, actes électroniques.
79.
TruongY (2013) A cross-country study of consumer innovativeness and technological service innovation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 20(1): 130–137.
80.
TsaiSP (2007) Message framing strategy for brand communication. Journal of Advertising Research47(3): 364–377.
81.
TurelOSerenkoABontisN (2010) User acceptance of hedonic digital artifacts: a theory of consumption values perspective. Information & Management47(1): 53–59.
82.
Valette-FlorenceP (1989) Conceptualisation et mesure de l’implication. Recherche et Applications en Marketing4(1): 57–78.
83.
VeblenT (1899) The Theory of the Leisure Class. New York: Macmillan.
84.
VenkatramanMPPriceLL (1990) Differentiating between cognitive and sensory innovativeness: concepts, measurement, and implications. Journal of Business Research20(4): 293–315.
85.
VernetteEBéji-BécheurAGolletyMHamdi-KidarL (2013) Les lead-users en marketing: interrogations et nouvelles contributions psychométriques. Recherche et Applications en Marketing28(4): 3–27.
86.
WangQDackoSGadM (2008) Factors influencing consumers’ evaluation and adoption intention of really-new products or services: prior knowledge, innovativeness and timing of product evaluation. Advances in Consumer Research35, 416–422.
87.
WangHYWangSH (2010) Predicting mobile hotel reservation adoption: insight from a perceived value standpoint. International Journal of Hospitality Management29(4): 598–608.
88.
WoodallT (2003) Conceptualising ‘value for the customer’: an attributional, structural and dispositional analysis. Academy of Marketing Science Review12. Available at: http://www.amsreview.org/articles/woodall12–2003.pdf .
89.
WoodruffRB (1997) Customer value: the next source for competitive advantage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science25(2): 139–153.
90.
YiMYFiedlerKDParkJS (2006) Understanding the role of individual innovativeness in the acceptance of IT-based innovations: comparative analyses of models and measures. Decision Sciences37(3): 393–426.
91.
YooBDonthuNLeeS (2000) An examination of selected marketing mix elements and brand equity. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science28(2): 195–211.
92.
ZeithamlVA (1988) Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing52(3): 2–22.
