Une promotion multi-mécanismes associe dans la même communication plusieurs mécanismes promotionnels. L'efficacité relative de ce type de promotions sur les choix du consommateur dépend de deux effets antagonistes. D'une part, la théorie des prospects postule un effet direct positif de la superposition des mécanismes sur la valeur perçue de la promotion car le consommateur valorise davantage une offre présentant les gains de manière séparée (principe de ségrégation). D'autre part, la superposition des mécanismes pourrait réduire indirectement cette valeur perçue à travers une moindre sincérité perçue. Une expérimentation inter-sujets portant sur 210 adultes et proposant un nombre variable de mécanismes monétaires pour une valeur constante de l'offre montre que la promotion mono-mécanisme est préférée. Des implications managériales sont proposées concernant les nouveaux instruments de promotion qui utilisent fréquemment des opérations multi-mécanismes associant industriels et distributeurs.
BoltonR.N. (1989), The relationship between market characteristics and promotional price elasticities, Marketing Science, 8, 2, 153–169.
9.
BréchetA.DesmetP.De PechpeyrouP. (2005), Effets de l'annonce d'un prix multidimensionnel sur la confiance dans la marque, Actes du 4e Congrès international sur les tendances du marketing, Paris, 21–22 janvier.
10.
ChandonP.WansinkB.LaurentG. (2000), A benefit congruency framework of sales promotion effectiveness, Journal of Marketing, 64, 3, 65–81.
11.
ChenS.S.MonroeK.B.LouY. (1998), The effects of framing price promotion messages on consumer's perceptions and purchase intentions, Journal of Retailing, 74, 3, 353–372.
12.
ChongB.YangZ.WongM. (2003), Asymmetrical impact of trustworthiness attributes on trust, perceived value and purchase intention: a conceptual framework for cross-cultural study on consumer perception of online auction, Actes de la Conférence ACM International, 50, 213–219.
13.
Della BittaA.J.MonroeK.B.McGinnisJ.M. (1981), Consumer perceptions of comparative price advertisements, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 4, 416–427.
14.
DiamondW.D.CampbellL. (1989), The framing of sales promotions: effects on reference price change, Advances in Consumer Research, 16, 1, 241–247.
15.
DiamondW.D.JohnsonR.R. (1990), The framing of sales promotions: an approach to classification, Advances in Consumer Research, 17, 1, 494–500.
16.
DodsonJ.A.TyboutA.M.SternthalB. (1978), Impact of deals and deal retraction on brand switching, Journal of Marketing Research, 15, 1, 72–81.
17.
EisendM. (2006), Source credibility dimensions in marketing communication — a generalized solution, Journal of Empirical Generalizations in Marketing, 10, 1–33.
18.
EstelamiH. (1997), Consumer perceptions of multi-dimensional prices, Advances in Consumer Research, 24, éds. BrucksM.MacInnisD.J., Provo, UT, Association for Consumer Research, 392–399.
19.
GarbarinoE.JohnsonM.S. (1999), The different roles of satisfaction, trust, and commitment in customer relationships, Journal of Marketing, 63, 2, 70–87.
20.
GoldsmithR.E.LaffertyB.A.NewellS.J. (2000), The impact of corporate credibility and celebrity credibility on consumer reaction to advertisements and brands, Journal of Advertising, 29, 3, 43–54.
21.
GountasS.MavondoF. (2005), Emotions, sincerity and consumer satisfaction, Actes de l'ANZMAC, Fremantle, Australie.
22.
GuptaS.CooperL.G. (1992), The discounting of discounts and promotion thresholds, Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 3, 401–411.
23.
Gramont (de)D. (2004), Les nouveaux instruments de promotion (NIP), Revue de la Concurrence et de la Consommation, 140, 11–14.
24.
HairJ.F.BlackW.C.BabinB.J.AndersonR.E.TathamR.L. (2006), Multivariate data analysis (6e édition), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
25.
HeiderF. (1958), The psychology of interpersonal relations, New York, John Wiley and Sons.
26.
Ilec (2004), Les consommateurs et les promotions, Cahiers de l'Ilec, 2, 1–113.
27.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1979), Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica, 47, 2, 263–29.
28.
KleinN.M.OglethorpeJ.E. (1987), Cognitive reference points in consumer decision making, Advances in Consumer Research, 14, 1, 183–187.
29.
LarceneuxF. (2003), Stratégies de signalisation de la qualité: l'impact des labels sur le processus de décision des consommateurs, Thèse de doctorat en sciences de gestion, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris.
30.
LevinI.P.GaethG.J. (1988), How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product, Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 3, 374–378.
31.
LichtensteinD.R.BeardenW.O. (1986), Measurement and structure of Kelley's covariance theory, Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 2, 290–296.
32.
MacKenzieS.LutzR. (1989), An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context, Journal of Marketing, 53, 2, 48–65.
33.
MorganR.M.HuntS.M. (1994), The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing, Journal of Marketing, 58, 3, 20–38.
34.
RomaniS. (2004), Price misleading advertising: effects on consumers' attitudes and intentions, Actes de la 33e Conférence EMAC, Murcia, Espagne.
35.
RosenbergM.J.HovlandC.I. (1960), Cognitive, affective, and behavioural components of attitude, Attitude organisation and change: an analysis of consistency among attitude components, éds. RosenbergM.J.HovlandC.I.McGuireW.J.AbelsonR.P.BrehmsJ.W., New Haven, Yale University Press.
36.
SchindlerR.M. (1989), The excitement of getting a bargain: some hypotheses concerning the origins and effects of smart-shopper feelings, Advances in Consumer Research, 16, éd. SrullT.K., Provo, UT, Association for Consumer Research, 447–453.
37.
SimonH.A. (1955), A behavioral model of rational choice, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 1, 99–118.
38.
SirdeshmukhD.SinghJ.SabolB. (2002), Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges, Journal of Marketing, 66, 1, 15–37.
39.
SpeedR.ThompsonP. (2000), Determinants of sports sponsorship response, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28, 2, 226–238.
