Lors d'une expérience menée en magasin, des vendeurs ont imité ou non les comportements verbaux et non verbaux des clients. Il semblerait que le mimétisme soit associé à une augmentation du taux d'achat, à plus de conformisme à L'égard d'une suggestion faite par le vendeur et à des évaluations plus positives du vendeur et du magasin. Les analyses de médiation ont mis en évidence le rôle de la perception des compétences du vendeur dans la relation entre le mimétisme et le comportement d'achat. L'intérêt managérial lié notamment à la formation des vendeurs et à l'importance de la relation client/vendeur est discuté.
BakerJ.GrewalD.ParasuramanA. (1994), The influence of store environment on quality inferences and store image, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22, 4, 328–339.
2.
BailensonJ.N.YeeN. (2005), Digital chameleons: automatic assimilation of nonverbal gestures in immersive virtual environments, Psychological Science, 16, 10, 814–819.
3.
BaudonnièreP.M. (1997), Le mimétisme et l'imitation, Paris, Flammarion.
4.
BernieriF.J. (1988), Coordinated movement and rapport in teacher-student interactions, Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 2, 120–138.
5.
BurgerJ.M.MessainN.PatelS.Del PradoA.AndersonC. (2004), What a coincidence! The effects of incidental similarity on compliance, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1, 35–43.
6.
BushL.K.BarrC.L.McHugoG.J.LanzettaJ.T. (1989), The effects of facial control and facial mimicry on subjective reaction to comedy routines, Motivation and Emotion, 13, 1, 31–52.
7.
CappellaJ.N.PanalpS. (1981), Talk and silence sequences in informal conversations: III. Interspeaker influence, Human Communication Research, 7, 2, 117–132.
8.
ChartrandT.L.BarghJ.A. (1999), The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 6, 893–910.
9.
ChartrandT.L.HuberJ.ShivB.TannerR. (2008), Nonconscious goals and consumer choice, Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 2, 189–201.
10.
ChartrandT.L.van BaarenR. (2009), Human mimicry, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 219–274.
11.
CialdiniR.B. (2004), Influence: science and practice (4e édition), Boston, Allyn et Bacon.
DijksterhuisA.SmithP.K.Van BaarenR.B.WigboldusD.H. (2005), The unconscious consumer: effects of environment on consumer behavior, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15, 3, 193–202.
14.
EastR.HammondK.LomaxW. (2008), Measuring the impact of positive and negative word of mouth on brand purchase probability, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25, 3, 215–224.
15.
FinchJ.F.CialdiniR.B. (1989), Another direct tactic of (self-)image management: boosting, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 2, 222–232.
GeorgeL.StopaL. (2008), Private and public self-awareness in social anxiety, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 39, 1, 57–72.
18.
GilesH.PoweslandP.F. (1975), Speech style and social evaluation, Londres, Academic Press.
19.
GirandolaF. (2003), Psychologie de la persuasion et de l'engagement, Besançon, Presses Universitaires de Franche-Comté.
20.
GoldsteinN.J.MartinS.CialdiniR. (2008), Yes !—Devenez un as de la persuasion en 50 leçons, L'Express.
21.
HarakehZ.EngelsR.van BaarenR.B.ScholteR.H.J. (2007), Imitation of cigarette smoking: an experimental study of smoking in a naturalistic setting, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 86, 2, 199–206.
22.
KouzakovaM.van BaarenR.van KnippenbergA. (2010), Lack of behavioral imitation in human interactions enhances salivary cortisol level, Hormones and Behavior, 57, 421–426.
23.
LaFranceM. (1979), Nonverbal synchrony and rapport: analysis by the cross-lag panel technique, Social Psychology Quaterly, 42, 1, 66–70.
24.
LaFranceM. (1982), Posture mirroring and rapport, in DavisM. (coord.), Interaction rhythms: periodicity in commutative behaviour, New York, Human Sciences Press, 279–298.
25.
LakinJ.L.ChartrandT.L. (2003), Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport, Psychological Science, 14, 4, 334–339.
26.
LakinJ.L.JefferisV.E.ChengC.M.ChartrandT. (2003), The chameleon effect as social glue: evidence for the evolutionary significance of nonconscious mimicry, Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27, 3, 145–162.
27.
LandisJ.R.KochG.G. (1977), A one-way components of variance model for categorical data, Biometrics, 33, 671–679.
28.
LynnM. (2005), Increasing servers’ tips: what managers can do and why they should do it, Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 8, 4, 89–98.
29.
LynnM.LeJ.M.SherwynD. (1998), Reach out and touch your customers, Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 39, 60–65.
30.
LynnM.WithiamG. (sous presse), Tipping and its alternatives: business considerations and directions for research, Journal of Services Marketing.
31.
MadduxW.W.MullenE.GalinskyA.D. (2008), Chameleons bake bigger pies and take bigger pieces: strategic behavioral mimicry facilitates negotiation outcomes, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 2, 461–468.
32.
McKinnonD.P. (2008), Introduction to statistical mediation analysis, New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33.
MägiA.W. (2003), Share of wallet in retailing: the effects of customer satisfaction, loyalty cards and shopper characteristics, Journal of Retailing, 79, 2, 97–106.
34.
MartinA. (2010), L'effet caméléon comme outil de prévention de l'obésité infantile, Thèse de doctorat en psychologie, Université de Bretagne-Sud.
35.
MeltzoffA.DecetyJ. (2003), What imitation tells us about social cognition: a rapprochement between developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences, 358, 491–500.
36.
MessingerJ. (2007), Ces gestes qui manipulent, ces mots qui influencent: décodez les gestes et les mots de la manipulation, Paris, Pocket.
37.
MooreM.M. (1995), Courtship signaling and adolescents: “Girls just wanna have fun”?, The Journal of Sex Research, 32, 4, 319–328.
38.
PrestonS.D.De WaalF.B.M. (2002), Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 1, 1–72.
39.
ProvineR.R. (1992), Faces as releasers of contagious yawning: an approach to face detection using normal human subjects, Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 211–214.
40.
QuigleyB.M.CollinsR.L. (1999), Modeling of alcohol consumption: a meta-analytic review, Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 60, 2, 90–98.
41.
RizzolattiG.FadigaL.FogassiL.GalleseV. (1996), Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions, Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 131–141.
42.
RizzolattiG.SinigagliaC. (2007), Les neurones miroirs, Paris, Odile Jacob.
43.
SharmaA. (1990), The persuasive effect of salesperson credibility: conceptual and empirical examination, Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 10, 4, 71–80.
44.
TannerR.FerraroR.ChartrandT.L.BettmanJ.van BaarenR. (2008), Of chameleons and consumption: the impact of mimicry on choice and preferences, Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 6, 754–766.
45.
UnderhillP. (2009), Comprendre nos comportements d'achat: La science du shopping.Paris, Pearson Village-Mondial.
46.
Van BaarenR.B.HollandR.W.KawakamiK.Van KnippenbergA. (2004), Mimicry and prosocial behaviour, Psychological Science, 14, 71–74.
47.
Van BaarenR.B.HollandR.W.SteenaertB.Van KnippenbergA. (2003), Mimicry for money: behavioral consequences of imitation, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 4, 393–398.
48.
WebbJ.T. (1972), Interview synchrony: an investigation of two speech rate measures, in SiegmanA.W.PopeB. (coord.), Studies in dyadic communication, New York, Pergamon Press, 115–133.
49.
YabarY.JohnstonL.MilesL.PeaceV. (2006), Implicit behavioral mimicry: investigating the impact of group membership, Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 30, 3, 97–113.
