Cette recherche utilise la théorie du signal pour prédire
qu'une stratégie EDLP (Every Day Low Price)
influence la perception des garanties du meilleur prix. Les résultats
d'une expérimentation indiquent que le distributeur EDLP peut
proposer un remboursement élevé, car cela augmente la
crédibilité de sa politique-prix. En revanche, en l'absence
d'une EDLP, un remboursement élevé est perçu comme
peu crédible, ce qui réduit sa valeur et l'intention
d'achat dans le magasin.
BaronR.M.KennyD.A.
(1986), The moderator-mediator variable
distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and
statistical considerations, Journal of Personality
et Social Psychology, 51, 6,
1173–1182.
2.
BellD.R.LattinJ.M.
(1998), Shopping behavior et consumer preference
for store price format: why “large basket” shoppers prefer
EDLP, Marketing Science,
17, 1,
66–88.
3.
BiswasA.PulligCh.YagciM.I.DeanD.H.
(2002), Consumer evaluation of low price
guarantees: the moderating role of reference price and store
image, Journal of Consumer Psychology,
12, 2,
107–118.
4.
BouldingW.KirmaniA.
(1993), A consumer-side experimental examination
of signaling theory: do consumers perceive warranties as signals of
quality, Journal of Consumer Research,
20, 1,
111–123.
5.
CalderB.J.PhillipsL.W.TyboutA.M.
(1981), Designing research for
application, Journal of Consumer Research,
8, 2,
197–207.
6.
DarkeP.R.ChungC.M.Y.
(2005), Effects of pricing and promotion on
consumer perceptions: it depends on how you frame it,
Journal of Retailing, 81,
1, 35–47.
7.
DesmetP.Le
NagardE.
(2005), Differential effects of price-beating
versus price-matching guarantee on retailers' price
image, Journal of Product & Brand
Management, 14, 6,
393–399.
8.
DuttaS.BiswasA.
(2005), Effects of low price guarantees on
consumer post-purchase search intention: the moderating roles of value
consciousness and penalty level, Journal of
Retailing, 81, 4,
283–291.
9.
EstelamiH.GrewalD.RoggeveenA.
(2007), The negative effect of policy
restrictions on consumers' post-purchase reactions to price-matching
guarantees, Journal of the Academy of Marketing
Science, 35, 2,
208–219.
10.
GrewalD.MonroeK.B.KrishnanR.
(1998), The effects of price-comparison
advertising on buyers' perceptions of acquisition value, transaction
value, and behavioral intentions, Journal of
Marketing, 62, 2,
46–59.
11.
GuptaS.CooperL.G.
(1992), The discounting of discounts and
promotion thresholds, Journal of Consumer
Research, 19, 3,
401–411.
12.
HochS.J.DrèzeX.PurkM.E.
(1994), EDLP, Hi-Lo, and margin
arithmetic, Journal of Marketing,
58, 4,
16–27.
13.
JainS.SrivastavaJ.
(2000), An experimental and theoretical analysis
of price-matching refund policies, Journal of
Marketing Research, 37, 3,
351–362.
14.
KirmaniA.RaoA.R.
(2000), No pain, no gain: a critical review of
the literature on signaling unobservable product quality,
Journal of Marketing, 64,
2, 66–79.
15.
Kukar-KinneyM.WaltersR.G.
(2003), Consumer perceptions of refund depth and
competitive scope in price-matching guarantees: effects on store
patronage, Journal of Retailing,
79, 3,
153–160.
16.
Kukar-KinneyM.WaltersR.G.MacKenzieS.B.
(2007), Consumer responses to characteristics of
price-matching guarantees: the moderating role of price
consciousness, Journal of Retailing,
83, 2,
211–221.
17.
LichtensteinD.R.BeardenW.O.
(1989), Contextual influences on perceptions of
merchant-supplied reference prices, Journal of
Consumer Research, 16, 1,
55–66.
18.
PechtlH.
(2004), Profiling intrinsic deal proneness for
Hi-Lo and EDLP price promotion strategies, Journal
of Retailing et Consumer Services, 11,
4, 223–233.
19.
SpenceM.
(2002), Signaling in retrospect and the
informational structure of markets, American
Economic Review, 92, 3,
434–459.
20.
SrivastavaJ.LurieN.H.
(2001), A consumer perspective on price-matching
refund policies: effect on price perceptions and search
behavior, Journal of Consumer Research,
28, 2,
296–307.
21.
SrivastavaJ.LurieN.H.
(2004), Price-matching guarantees as signals of
low store prices: survey and experimental evidence,
Journal of Retailing, 80,
2, 117–128.
22.
UrbanyJ.E.BeardenW.O.WeilbakerD.C.
(1988), The effect of plausible et exaggerated
reference prices on consumer perceptions and price search,
Journal of Consumer Research, 15,
1, 95–110.
23.
ZeithamlV.A.
(1988), Consumer perception of price, quality
and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence,
Journal of Marketing, 52,
3, 2–22.
