La méthodologie féministe, réalité ou fiction? Cet article analyse le concept d'une méthodologie féministe dans le contexte d'un pluralisme méthodologique et de buts absolutistes/supériorité de la connaissance. Il montre rapidement les confusions dans l'utilisation du terme et pointe les risques de tautologie. Il apporte des éléments contre l'exclusivité, l'impérialisme et la certitude de la connaissance et propose que, comme les plus importantes contributions du féminisme étaient dans l'opposition à ces approches, toute notion de modèles préscriptifs de paradigme de recherche doit être résistée. Une méthodologie féministe pour elle-même est impensable et intellectuellement non souhaitable.
Arendt, Hannah ( 1958) The Human Condition, Chicago and London: Chicago University Press
2.
Bell, Colin and Newby, Howard eds. (1977) Doing Sociological Research, London: Allen and Unwin
3.
Bourdieu, P. ( 1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice, London : Cambridge University Press
4.
Clegg, Sue ( 1985) Feminist Methodology-Fact or Fiction, Quality and Quantity, no.19: 83-97
5.
Crawford, Mary and Marecek, Jeanne ( 1989) Feminist Theory, Feminist Psychology, A Bibliography of Epistemology, Critical Analysis, and Applications, Psychology of Women Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 4: 477-491
6.
Grant, Linda, Ward, Kathryn B. and Rong, Xue Lan Rong ( 1987) Is there an association between gender and methods in sociological research?, American Sociological Review, vol. 52, no. 6, December: 856-862
7.
Harding, Sandra ( 1987) Is There A Feminist Method? Feminism and Methodology: Social Science Issues, Bloomington: Indiana University Press: 3-14
8.
Kaplan, Gisela ( 1993) Accounting for Difference: A Review of Feminism and Political Theory, Political Theory Newsletter, vol. 5, no. 2, September: 140-163
9.
McCormack, Thelma ( 1989) Feminism and the new crisis in methodology, The Effect of Feminist Approaches on Research Methodologies, ed. Winnie Tomm, Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, for the Calgary Institute for the Humanities: 13-30 (review by S.M.Culver, Signs, vol. 16, no.3:613)
10.
Oakley, Ann ( 1982) Interviewing women, a contradiction in terms?Doing Feminist Research, ed. Helen Roberts , London, Boston and Henley: Routledge and Kegan Paul: 30-61
11.
Peplau, Letitia A. and Conrad, Eva ( 1989) Beyond Non-Sexist Research. The Perils of Feminist Methods in Psychology, Psychology of Women Quarterly, vol. 13, no.4: 379-400
12.
Saarinen, Aino ( 1988) Feminist Research: In Search of a New Paradigm?Acta Sociologica, vol.31, no.1: 35-51
13.
Scott, Sue ( 1984) On being a female interviewer, Social Researching: Politics, Problems, Practice, eds. C.Bell and H.Roberts, London: Routledge and K.Paul
14.
Stanley, L. and Wise, Sue ( 1990) Method, methodology and epistemology in feminist research processes, Feminist Praxis, Research, Theory and Epistemology in Feminist Sociology, ed. L. Stanley, London and New York: Routledge:20-62
15.
White, Jacquelyn W. and Farmer, Richard ( 1992) Research Methods: How they Shape Views of Sexual Violence , Journal of Social Issues, vol.48, no.1: 45-89
