Missing Subscribers, The Red List and Mobile Telephones in General Population Surveys Concerning Drugs: Survey designers using Computer-Assisted Téléphone Interviews (CATI) are confronted with four types of populations: Owners of land-line telephones which include those on the Red (unlisted number) List; Owners of only mobile telephones; and those who don't own a telephone. Over the past few years, the proportion of land-line users has decreased as only mobile users increased. Even if the telephone remains an excellent means for contacting individuals residing in France (only 1.2% have no telephone), the increase in Red List numbers and only mobile users complicates methods developed since the early 1990; the choice of not contacting these persons should be made on a knowledgeable basis. Two types of research presented here allow us to extend our knowledge of these populations in relation to the use of psychoactive substances: a random survey of land-line users (n=13,685) allows us to characterize Red List members conceming declared drug use and associated opinions; a survey (n=2,009) concerning the social representation of drug users, including a sub-sample of only mobile users (n=201) permits us to obtain a summary description of the later and measure differences between them and line-liner users on these same questions.
Barrufol E., Verger P., Rotily M., 2001, « L'utilisation du téléphone dans une enquête de santé mentale : analyse du rang d'appel, des données manquantes et de l'effet « enquêteur » ». Population, 56 (6), 987-1010.
5.
Baudier F., Arenes J., 1997, Baromètre santé adultes 95/96, Les éditions du CFES, Paris.
Beck F., Arwidson P., Firdion J.M., Jaspard M., Grémy I., Warszawski J., 2001a, « L'avenir des enquêtes téléphoniques face à l'évolution des télécommunications » , in Droesbeke J. J. et Lebart L. (dir.), Enquêtes, modèles et applications, Dunod, Paris, pp 285-293.
8.
Beck F., Legleye S., Peretti-Watel P., 2001b, « Drogues illicites : Pratiques et attitudes » . In Guilbert P., Baudier F. (dir.) Baromètre santé 2000Vanves, Les éditions du CFES, pp. 237-274.
9.
Beck F., Legleye S., Peretti-Watel P., 2003, « Penser les drogues : Perceptions des produits et des politiques publiques, EROPP 2002 », Rapport OFDT.
10.
Czaja R., 1987, « Asking sensitive behavioral questions in telephone interviews », Quarterly of Community Health Education , Vol. 8(1), 23-32.
11.
Dillman D.A., 1978, Mail and telephone surveys: The Total Design Method . New York: John Wiley.
12.
Emcdda, 2002, Handbook for surveys on drug use among the general population.
13.
Etter J.F., Duc T.V., Perneger T.V., 1999, "Validity of the Fagerstrôm test for nicotine dependance and of the heaviness of smoking index among relatively light smokers ", Addiction; 99(2) : 269-81.
14.
Firdion J.M., 1993, « Effet du rang d'appel et de la présence du conjoint dans une enquête par téléphone », Population, 5, 1281-1314.
15.
Frejean M., Panzani J.P., Tassi Ph., 1990, « Les ménages inscrits en liste rouge et les enquêtes par téléphone ». Journal de la Société de Statistique de Paris, 131:3-4.
16.
Frey J.H., 1989, Survey research by telephone. Newbury Park: Sage.
17.
Fuchs M., 2000, Non response in cellular phone survey - Experience from a comparison with a regular CATI study, International Sociological Association, Fifth International Conference, Cologne.
18.
Grémy I.Halfen S., 2002, « Les connaissances, attitudes et perceptions des Franciliens à l'égard du tabac », ORS Ile de France.
19.
Gribble J.N., Miller H.G., Cooley P.C., Catania J.A., Pollack L., Turner C.F., 2000, « The impact of T-ACASI interviewing on reported drug use among men who have sex with men », Substance Use and Misuse, 35(6-8), 869-890.
20.
Guilbert P., Baudier F., Gautier A., (dir.), 2001, Baromètre santé 2000. Vanves, Les éditions du CFES.
21.
Jaspard M., Brown E., Condon S., Fougeyrollas-Schwebel D., Houel A., Lhomond B., Maillochon F., Saurel-Cubizolles M.-J., Schiltz M.-A., 2003, Les violences envers les femmes en France, une enquête nationale, Secrétariat d'Etat aux Droits des Femmes et à la Formation permanente, Service des Droits des Femmes et de l'égalité , Paris, La Documentation française .
22.
Kish L., 1949, "A procedure for objective respondent selection within the household". Journal of the American Statistical Association , 44, 380-387.
23.
Kraus L., Augustin R., 2001, "Measuring alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems: Comparison of responses from self-administered questionnaires and telephone interviews". Addiction;96, 459-471.
24.
Kuusela V., Vikki K., 1999, Change of telephone coverage due to mobile phones , International conference on Survey nonresponse, Portland .
Leridon H., Oustry P., Bajos N. et l'équipe COCON, 2002, " La médicalisation croissante de la contraception en France " Population et sociétés, 381 (juillet-août).
27.
Mangione T.W., Hingson R., Barett J., 1982, "Collecting sensitive data, a comparison of three survey strategies", Sociological Methods and Research, 10, 337-347.
28.
Médiamétrie, Les baromètres multimédia 2003 (4ème trimestre), La nouvelle donne de la téléphonie fixe en France, http://www.mediametrie.fr/.
29.
Moberg, 1982, "Biases in Unlisted phone numbers", Journal of Advertising Research, 22, 4, 51-55.
30.
Nathan G., 2001, "Telesurvey methodologies for household surveys - A review and some thoughts for the future", Survey Methodology , 27, 1, 7-31.
31.
Nicolaas G., Lynn P., 2002, "Random Digit Dialng in the UK: Viability revisited", J R Statis Soc A, 165, Part 2, 297-316.
32.
Noels B., Wydoodt J.P., 1996, Alcohol, illegale drugs en medicatie: recent ontwikkelingen in Vlaanderren, Bruxelles: VAD.
33.
Olcdndick R.W., Bishop G.F., Sorenson S.B., Tuchfarber A.J., 1988, "A Comparison of the Kish and Last Birthday Methods of Respondent Selection in Telephone Surveys." Journal of Official Statistics, 4, 307-318.
34.
Olsson B., 2004, "Fear and Curiosity - Drug Use among the General Population in Sweden", European Society for Social Research on Drugs (ESSD), 13th annual ESSD conference, 26 to 28 September 2003, Gent, Belgium.
35.
Orden S., Dyer A., Liu K., Perkins L., Ruth K., Burke G., Manolio T., 1992, « Random digit dialing in Chicago CARDIA : Comparison of individuals with unlisted and listed telephone numbers » , Am J Epidemiol, 135:697-709.
36.
Ramsay M., Partridge S., 2002, Drug Misuse Declared in 2001 : Results from the British Crime Survey, Home Office, London .
37.
Ramsay M., Spiller J., 1997, Drug Misuse Declared in 1996 : Latest results from the British Crime Survey, Home Office, London.
38.
Riandey B., Firdion J.M., 1993, « Vie personnelle et enquête téléphonique, l'exemple de l'ACSF », Population, 5, 1257-1280.
Rodgers S.M., Gribble J.N., Turner C.F., Miller H.G., 1999, « Entretiens autoadministrés sur ordinateurs et mesure des comportements sensibles », Population , 54 (2), 231-250.
41.
Roslow S., Roslow L., 1972, Unlisted phone subscribers are différent , Journal of Advertising Research, 12, 4, 35-38.
42.
Roy G., Vanheuverzwyn A., 2000, « Le téléphone mobile dans les enquêtes par sondage », Journées de méthodologie statistique, INSEE (5 décembre 2000).
43.
Roy G., Vanheuverzwyn A., 2002, « Mobile Phone in Sample Surveys », Communication présentée à l'ICIS 2002 (International Conference on Improving Surveys), Copenhague, 25-28 août 2002, http://www.icis.dk/ICIS_papers/A_3_5.pdf
44.
Salmon C.T.Nichols J.S., 1983, "The next-birthday method for respondent selection ". Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 270-276.
45.
Spira A., Bajos N. et al., 1992, "Analysis of sexual behaviour in France. A comparison between two modes of investigation : Telephone survey and face to face surveyé, AIDS, 6, pp. 315-323.
46.
Turner C.F., Ku L., Rodgers S.M., Lindberg L.D., Pleck J.H., Sonenstein F.L., 1998, « Adolescent Sexual Behavior, Drug Use, and Violence : Increased Reporting with Computer Survey Technology » , Science, (280), 867-873.
47.
Uitenbroek D., Mc Queen D.V., 1991, Continuous Collection of Sensitive Behavioural Data, US Bureau of Census.
