Previous research has shown differential counts by race and ethnicity across several recent United States decennial censuses. This article presents findings from a 2010 Census ethnographic evaluation with a record check, conducted to identify factors affecting enumeration among racial/ethnic groups. In eight sites targeted to major racial/ethnic groups, ethnographers observed live census interviews and assessed where persons should have been counted. In the record check, housing unit rosters were matched with four data sources to identify inconsistencies in where to count persons. Ethnographic themes that contributed to record check inconsistencies include respondent access difficulty, language issues, and cultural issues. Ways to improve enumeration include improving access to hard-to-reach respondents and increasing the cultural awareness of enumerators.
BatesNMulryM (2011) Using a Geographic Segmentation to Understand, Predict, and Plan for Census and Survey Mail Nonresponse. Journal of Official Statistics, December: 601–618.
2.
BruceARobinsonJGSandersMV (2001) Hard-to-Count Scores and Broad Demographic Groups Associated with Patterns of Response Rates in Census 2000. Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section. American Statistical Association, August, 2001, Atlanta, Georgia.
3.
BuntenA (2011) Comparative Ethnographic Studies of Enumeration Methods and Coverage in Race/Ethnic Groups - Alaska Natives and Others in the Kodiak Borough 2010 Nonresponse Followup Operation. Comparative Ethnographic Studies of Enumeration Methods and Coverage across Race/Ethnic Groups Site Report - The 2010 Census Nonresponse Followup Operation. Suitland, MD: US Census Bureau.
4.
ClarkJMoulD (2004) ‘Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation, and Evaluation Program Topic No. 10, Tr-10, Coverage Improvement in the Census 2000 Enumeration’. Washington DC: US Census Bureau.
5.
De la PuenteM (1993) Why are People Missed or Erroneously Enumerated in the Census - A Summary of Findings from Ethnographic Research. Proceedings of the 1993 Research Conference on Undercounted Ethnic Populations. Suitland, MD: US Census Bureau: 29–66.
6.
De la Puente M (2004) Census 2000 Ethnographic Studies - Census Topic Report Number 15. Census 2000 Testing, Experimentation and Evaluation Program TR-15, issued March 2004. Suitland, MD: US Census Bureau.
7.
GarciaV (2011) 2010 Census CPEX - Ethnographic Evaluation of Enumeration Methods and Coverage - Nonresponse Followup 2010 Observations of Hispanics and Others in the Greater Dallas Area. Comparative Ethnographic Studies of Enumeration Methods and Coverage across Race/Ethnic Groups Site Report. Suitland, MD: US Census Bureau.
8.
GarciaV (2012) Enumerating Hispanic Immigrants - Observations from Census Studies and Recommendations for an Accurate Count. Paper presented at the International Conference on Methods for Surveying and Enumerating Hard-to-Reach Populations. 3 November 2012, New Orleans, Louisiana.
9.
GovernKCoombsJGloriosoR (2012) ‘2010 Census Coverage Followup Assessment Report’. 2010 Census Program for Evaluations and Experiments Evaluation. 2010 Census Planning Memoranda Series, No. 197. 23 May 2012. Available at:http://www.census.gov/2010census/pdf/2010_Census_CFU_Assessment.pdf.
10.
Hogan H (1993) The1990Post-Enumeration Survey - Operations and Results. Journal of the American Statistical Association88(423): 1047–60.
11.
HumesKRJonesNARamirezRR (2011) Overview of Race and Hispanic Origin - Census 2010 Brief. Washington, DC: Economics and Statistics Administration, US Census Bureau. Available online athttp://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-02.pdf.
12.
JacksonGZhangB (2012) ‘2010 Census Update Enumerate Operations Assessment Report’. 2010 Census Program for Evaluations and Experiments Evaluation. 2010 Census Planning Memoranda Series, No 244. October 11, 2012. Available at: http://www.census.gov/2010census/pdf/2010_Census_UEOs_Assessment.pdf.
13.
JarrettR (2010) ‘Comparative Ethnographic Study of Enumeration Methods and Coverage in Race/Ethnic Groups - African Americans and Others in the 2010 Census Nonresponse Followup Operation’. Comparative Ethnographic Studies of Enumeration Methods and Coverage across Race/Ethnic Groups Site Report. Suitland, MD: US Census Bureau.
14.
LahrenS (2012) ‘Comparative Study of Enumeration Methods and Coverage on a Rural American Indian Reservation - A Case Study’. Comparative Ethnographic Studies of Enumeration Methods and Coverage across Race/Ethnic Groups Site Report - The 2010 Census Update Enumerate Operation. Suitland, MD: US Census Bureau.
15.
LamasE (2009) “Residence Rule and Residence Situations for the 2010 Census.” Memorandum from Enrique Lamas, Chief, Population Division, to Frank Vitrano, Chief, Decennial Management Division, 24 April 2009. Suitland, MD: US Census Bureau.
16.
LaporteA (1999) Social Cultural Factors and Presenation of Self in Different Survey Contexts : Analysis of an Example of Disagreement. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique. 63: 29–45.
17.
MarpsatM (2012) Statistical Measure, Policy Measure – The Case of Rough Sleepers. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique. 115: 21–44.
18.
Martin E BrownriggLFayR (1989) “Results of Ethnographic Studies of 1988 Rehearsal Census Coverage. Suitland, MD: U.S. Census Bureau. Available at: https://www.census.gov/srd/papers/pdf/ev89-09.pdf.
19.
McMillen-WolfeH (2011) ‘Ethnographic Evaluation of Enumeration Methods and Coverage in the 2010 Nonresponse Followup Operation on the Island of Hawaii, with Special Focus on Native Hawaiians and Other Pacific Islanders’. Comparative Ethnographic Studies of Enumeration Methods and Coverage across Race/Ethnic Groups Site Report - The 2010 Census Nonresponse Followup Operation. Suitland, MD: US Census Bureau.
20.
MuleT(2012) ‘Census Coverage Measurement Estimation Report - Summary of Estimates of Coverage for Persons in the United States’. DSSD 2010 Census Coverage Measurement Memorandum series #2010-G_01. Washington, DC: Census Bureau, 22 May 2012.
21.
RenschlerIKleinerB (2011) Considering Dialect in Survey Research. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique. 118: 51–59.
22.
RobinsonJGAdlakhaA (2002) ‘Comparison of A.C.E. Revision II Results with Demographic Analysis’. A.C.E. Revision II Estimates Memorandum Series #PP-41, US Census Bureau, December 31, 2002.
SchwedeLTerryRHunter ChildsJ (2014) Ethnographic Evaluations on Coverage of Hard-to-Count Minorities in US Decennial Censuses. In: TourangeauRBatesNEdwardsBJohnsonTWolterK (eds) Hard-to-Survey Populations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 293–315.
25.
US Census Bureau (1993) ‘Programs to Improve Coverage in the 1990 Census’. 1990 Census of the Population and Housing Evaluation and Research Reports, 1990 CPH-E-3. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office, November 1993.
ValentineCAValentineBL (1971) “Missing Men - A Comparative Methodological Study of Underenumeration and Related Problems.” Report prepared under Joint Statistical Agreement with the Brookdale Hospital Center, Washington. Suitland, MD: US Census Bureau.
29.
WalkerSWinderSJacksonGHeimelS. (2012) “The 2010 Census Nonresponse Followup Operations Assessment.” Census Program for Evaluations and Experiments. 2010 Census Planning Memoranda Series No. 190, April 30, 2012. Suitland, MD: US Census Bureau.
