Researchers concerned about intergenerational inequalities study absolute and relative mobility (e.g., whether people’s adult incomes exceed their parents’ incomes in dollars or ranks). Absolute and relative mobility are connected, by definition. Yet, they are not equivalent. Indeed, they often diverge. To illuminate why, when, and for whom such divergence occurs—and why, when, and for whom convergence is possible—this article provides two frameworks for connecting absolute and relative mobility. One framework is formal and one is typological. Both frameworks center micro-level socioeconomic experiences across generations. Illustrative analyses employ these frameworks using National Longitudinal Survey of Youth data. Results suggest that divergent experiences, like upward absolute mobility despite downward relative mobility, may be more common among more advantaged social groups. Future researchers could use the two frameworks introduced here to further advance our understanding of how intergenerational inequalities evolve differently in absolute and relative terms.
BergerThorEngzellPer. 2020. “Trends and Disparities in Subjective Upward Mobility Since 1940.” Socius6, 1–11.
2.
BermanYonatan. 2022. “The Long-Run Evolution of Absolute Intergenerational Mobility.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics14, 61–83.
3.
BlauPeterDuncanOtis Dudley. 1967. The American Occupational Structure. New York: Free Press.
4.
BloomeDeirdre. 2014. “Racial Inequality Trends and the Intergenerational Persistence of Income and Family Structure.” American Sociological Review79, 1196–1225.
5.
BloomeDeirdreDyerShaunaZhouXiang. 2018. “Educational Inequality, Educational Expansion, and Intergenerational Income Persistence in the United States.” American Sociological Review83, 1215–1253.
6.
BloomeDeirdreOpacicAleksei. 2024. “Absolute Income Mobility Obscures Marginalized Children’s Disadvantages.” The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences121, e2321418121.
7.
BoudonRaymond. 1974. Education, Opportunity, and Social Inequality. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
8.
BreenRichardMoodCarinaJonssonJan. 2016. “How Much Scope for a Mobility Paradox?.” Sociological Science3, 39–60.
9.
BrunoriPaoloFerreiraFranciscoPeragineVito. 2013. “Inequality of Opportunity, Income Inequality and Economic Mobility.” Working Paper 6304, The World Bank.
10.
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Manhattan Institute. 2015. “Policy Options for Improving Economic Opportunity and Mobility.” Peter G. Peterson Foundation.
11.
ChettyRajGruskyDavidHellMaximillianHendrenNathanielManducaRobertNarangJimmy. 2017. “The Fading American Dream: Trends in Absolute Income Mobility Since 1940.” Science356, 398–406.
12.
DeutscherNathanMazumderBhashkar. 2023. “Measuring Intergenerational Income Mobility: A Synthesis of Approaches.” Journal of Economic Literature61, 988–1036.
13.
DuncanOtis Dudley. 1966. “Methodological Issues in the Study of Social Mobility.” Pp. 51–97 in Social Structure and Mobility in Economic Development, edited by LipsetSeymour M.SmelserNeil J.. Chicago: Aldine.
14.
DurlaufStevenJohnsonPaulTempleJonathan. 2005. “Growth Econometrics.” Pp. 555–677 in Handbook of Economic Growth, Vol. 1A, edited by AghionPhilippeDurlaufSteven. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
15.
FeathermanDavidHauserRobert. 1978. Opportunity and Change. New York: Academic Press.
16.
FeenbergDanielCouttsElisabeth. 1993. “An Introduction to the TAXSIM Model.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management12, 189–194.
17.
FriedmanBenjamin. 2005. The Moral Consequences of Economic Growth. New York: Knopf.
18.
GoldthorpeJohn. 2000. “Outline of a Theory of Social Mobility.” Pp. 230–258 in On Sociology, edited by GoldthorpeJohn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
HauserRobertDickinsonPeterTravisHarryKoffelJohn. 1975. “Structural Changes in Occupational Mobility Among Men in the United States.” American Sociological Review40, 585–598.
20.
HoutMichael. 1989. Following in Father’s Footsteps. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
21.
HoutMichael. 2015. “A Summary of What We Know About Social Mobility.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science657, 27–36.
22.
HoutMichael. 2018. “Americans’ Occupational Status Reflects the Status of Both of Their Parents.” The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115, 9527–9532.
23.
HoutMichaelJanusAlexander. 2011. “Educational Mobility in the United States Since the 1930s.” Pp. 165–185 in Whither Opportunity, edited by DuncanGregMurnaneRichard. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
24.
JencksChristopher. 1988. “What Must be Equal for Opportunity to be Equal?” Pp. 47–74 in Equal Opportunity, edited by BowieNorman. Boulder: Westview Press.
25.
JohnsonPaulPapageorgiouChris. 2020. “What Remains of Cross-Country Convergence?” Journal of Economic Literature58, 129–175.
26.
KasardaJohnBillyJohnWestKirsten. 1986. Status Enhancement and Fertility. New York: Academic Press.
27.
KennedyTomasSiminskiPeter. 2022. “Are We Richer Than Our Parents Were? Absolute Income Mobility in Australia.” Economic Record98, 22–41.
28.
KenworthyLane. 2018. “America’s Great Decoupling.” Pp. 333–362 in Inequality and Inclusive Growth in Rich Countries, edited by BrianNolan. New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
LiYaojunZhangShunKongJianxun. 2015. “Social Mobility in China and Britain: A Comparative Study.” International Review of Social Research5, 20–34.
30.
LissErikKorpiMartinWennbergKarl. 2023. “Absolute Income Mobility and the Effect of Parent Generation Inequality: An Extended Decomposition Approach.” European Economic Review152, 104359.
31.
ManducaRobertHellMaximilian, et al. 2024. “Measuring Absolute Income Mobility: Lessons From North America and Europe.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics16, 1–30.
32.
MatrasJudah. 1961. “Differential Fertility, Intergenerational Occupational Mobility, and Change in the Occupational Distribution.” Population Studies15, 187–197.
33.
MazumderBhashkar. 2014. “Black–White Differences in Intergenerational Economic Mobility in the United States.” Economic PerspectivesQ1, 1–18.
34.
MitnikPabloBryantVictoriaWeberMichaelGruskyDavid. 2015. “New Estimates of Intergenerational Mobility Using Administrative Data.” Working Paper, Stanford Center on Poverty and Inequality.
35.
NarayanAmbarVan der WeideRoy, et al. 2018. Fair Progress? Economic Mobility Across Generations Around the World. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
36.
RayDebrajGenicotGarance. 2023. “Measuring Upward Mobility.” American Economic Review113, 3044–3089.
37.
RoemerJohn. 2004. “Equal Opportunity and Intergenerational Mobility.” Pp. 48–57 in Generational Income Mobility in North America and Europe, edited by CorakMiles. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
SawhillIsabelMortonJohn. 2007. Economic Mobility: Is the American Dream Alive and Well?Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trusts.
39.
SobelMichaelBeckerMarkMinickSusan. 1998. “Origins, Destinations, and Association in Occupational Mobility.” American Journal of Sociology104, 687–721.
40.
SongXiMasseyCatherineRolfKarenFerrieJosephRothbaumJonathanXieYu. 2020. “Long-Term Decline in Intergenerational Mobility in the United States Since the 1850s.” The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117, 251–258.
41.
StockhausenMaximilian. 2021. “Like Father, Like Son? A Comparison of Absolute and Relative Intergenerational Labour Income Mobility in Germany and the United States.” Journal of Economic Inequality19, 667–683.
42.
TorcheFlorencia. 2015. “Analyses of Intergenerational Mobility: An Interdisciplinary Review.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science657, 37–62.
43.
TrivediPravinZimmerDavid. 2007. “Copula Modeling.” Foundations and Trends in Econometrics1, 1–111.
44.
Van KermPhilippe. 2004. “What Lies Behind Income Mobility? Reranking and Distributional Change in Belgium, Western Germany and the USA.” Economica71, 223–239.
45.
WinshipScott. 2022. “Was Rising Inequality Behind Falling Absolute Mobility?Reassessing Chetty et al. (2017).” Working Paper, American Enterprise Institute.
46.
XieYuDongHaoZhouXiangSongXi. 2022. “Trends in Social Mobility in Postrevolution China.” The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences119, e2117471119.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
