This study compares face-to-face interviews (PAPI) and computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATI) on voter turnout of the 2004 presidential election in Taiwan. Results of voting behavior from both surveys are not consistent with actual voter turnout. Results from the PAPI sample are consistent with previous findings that respondents are partial toward the elected officials, but the CATI results are not. The latter results may be attributed to the disproportional distribution of parents’ ethnicity in the sample, although it is also possible that CATI respondents are simply telling the truth.
BowlingA (2005) Mode of Questionnaire Administration Can Have Serious Effects on Data Quality. Journal of Public Health27: 281–91.
2.
CasselC (2003) Overreporting and Electoral Participation Research. American Politics Research31: 81–92.
3.
ChangMK (2005) Taiwan’s Nationalistic Politics and Its Difficult “Status Quo”. Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies21: 91–124.
4.
ChangYHYCFu (2006) 2004 Taiwan Social Change Survey (Round 4, Year 5) - Citizenship[Data file]. Available from Survey Research Data Archive, Academia Sinica. DOI: 10.6141/TW-SRDA-C00112_1-1.
5.
ChiuHY (2004) First Social Image Survey in 2004[Data file]. Available from Survey Research Data Archive, Academia Sinica. DOI: 10.6141/TW-SRDA-C00135-1.
6.
CrowneDPMarloweDA (1960) A New Scale of Social Desirability Independent of Pathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology24: 349–54.
7.
De LeeuwEDvan der ZouwenJ (1988) Data Quality in Telephone and Face to Face Surveys - A Comparative Meta-analysis. In GrovesRMBiemerPPLybergLEMasseyJTNichollsII WLWaksbergJ (eds) Telephone Survey Methodology. New York: Wiley, 283–99.
8.
Díaz de RadaV (2011) Face-to face versus Telephone Surveys on Political Attitudes - A Comparative Analysis. Quality and Quantity45: 817–27.
9.
FuYCLuL (2012) Response to Social Desirability Bias in Interactions with Strangers - Influence of External Circumstances and Personal Attitudes. In ChuRLChiuHYChangLY (eds), Social Change in Taiwan, 1985-2005 - Psychology, Values, and Religion. (in Chinese: 台灣的社會變遷1985~2005: 心理、價值與宗教)Taipei: Academia Sinica, 293–346.
10.
HolbrookAGreenMCKrosnickJA (2003) Telephone versus Face-to-face Interviewing of National Probability Samples with Long Questionnaires - Comparisons of Respondent Satisficing and Social Desirability Response Bias. Public Opinion Quarterly67: 79–125.
11.
HuangC (2005) Dimensions of Taiwanese/Chinese Identity and National Identity in Taiwan - A Latent Class Analysis. Journal of Asian and African Studies40(1/2): 51–70.
12.
HuangC (2013) Taiwan’s Election and Democratization Study (TEDS) - Its Methodology in Retrospect and Prospect (in Chinese: 台灣選舉與民主化調查(TEDS)方法論之回顧與前瞻). Taipei: Wu Nan.
13.
HungYT (2001) Respondent Selection within Households (in Chinese: 戶中選樣之研究). Taipei: Wu Nan.
14.
PresserSStinsonL (1998) Data Collection Mode and Social Desirability Bias in Self-reported Religious Attendance. American Sociological Review63: 137–45.
15.
RichmanWLWaegeSHAgneessensF (2003) Respondent Related Correlates of Response Behavior in Audience Research. Quality & Quantity37: 411–34.
16.
RockwoodTHSangsterRLDillmanDA (1997) The Effect of Response Categories on Questionnaire Answers - Context and Mode Effects. Sociological Methods & Research26: 118–40.
17.
SelbPMunzertS (2013) Voter Overrepresentation, Vote Misreporting, and Turnout Bias in Postelection Surveys. Electoral Studies32(1): 186–96.
18.
StockéVStarkT (2007) Political Involvement and Memory Failure as Interdependent Determinants of Vote Overreporting. Applied Cognitive Psychology21: 239–57.
19.
TourangeauRSmithTW (1996) Asking Sensitive Questions - The Impact of Data Collection Mode, Question Format, and Question Context. Public Opinion Quarterly60: 275–304.
20.
TourangeauRRipsLJRasinskiK (2000) The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
TourangeauRYanT (2007) Sensitive Questions in Surveys. Psychological Bulletin133(5): 859–83.
22.
VoogtRJJSarisWE (2005) Mixed Mode Designs - Finding the Balance between Nonresponse Bias and Mode Effects. Journal of Official Statistics21(3): 367–87.
23.
ZeglovitsEKritzingerS (2014) New Attempts to Reduce Overreporting of Voter Turnout and Their Effects. International Journal of Public Opinion Research26(2): 224–34.
