This study explores the structure of the Big Five personality traits and the relationship of ethnicity and gender to this structure. Data from a previously published study on gender, ethnicity and the Abridged Big Five Circumplex are reanalyzed using Similarity Structure Analysis (SSA).1 This revealed a radex structure in which the pure five factor markers are arranged in a polar configuration, with Agreeableness placed opposite Neuroticism and Conscientiousness opposite Openness and Extraversion. The structure was verified among the entire survey population and among each sub-population by ethnicity and gender. The Agreeableness and Conscientiousness factors were the least stable.
AmarRCohenEH (2001) Hypothesized vs. Random Regionality in SSA. In ElizurD (ed.) Facet Theory: Integrating Theory Construction with Data Analysis. Prague: Facet Theory Association, 87–93.
3.
ArcherJ (2004) Sex Differences in Aggression in Real-world Settings: A Meta-analytic Review. Review of General Psychology8: 291–322.
4.
Benet-MartinezVJohnO (1998) Los Cinco Grandes across Cultures and Ethnic Groups: Multi-trait Multi-method Analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology75(3): 729–50.
5.
BorkenauPMcCraeRTerraccianoA (2013) Do Men Vary More than Women in Personality? A Study in 51 Cultures. Journal of Research in Personality47(2): 135–44.
6.
BriggsS (1992) Assessing the Five-factor Model of Personality Description. Journal of Personality60(2): 253–93.
7.
ChurchAKatigbakM (1989) Internal, External, and Self-report Structure of Personality in a Nonwestern Culture: Investigation of Cross-language and Cross-Cultural Generalizability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology57: 857–72.
8.
CohenA (1974) The Item-overlap Effect on the Scale Structure of the California Psychological Inventory. Dissertation Abstracts International34, 7534(12-A, Pt 1).
9.
CohenA (2003a) The Facets of Depression: Disturbance Domain and Level of Arousal. In LevySElizurD (eds) Facet Theory: Towards Cumulative Social Science. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, 347–55.
10.
CohenA (2003b) The Identification of Underlying Dimensionality in Social Sciences: Differences between Factor Analysis and Smallest Space Analysis. In: LevySElizurD (eds) Facet Theory: Towards Cumulative Social Science. Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, 61–71.
11.
CohenEHAmarR (2002) External Variables as Points in Smallest Space Analysis: A Theoretical, Mathematical and Computer-based Contribution. Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique75: 40–56.
12.
CollinsJGleavesD (1998) Race, Job Applicants, and the Five-factor Model of Personality: Implications for Black Psychology, Industrial/Organizational Psychology, and the Five-factor Theory. Journal of Applied Psychology83: 531–44.
13.
CostaPMcCraeR (1992) Manual for the NEO P-I-R. Odessa FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
14.
CostaPTerraccianoAMcCraeR (2001) Gender Differences in Personality Traits across Cultures: Robust and Surprising Findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology81: 322–31.
15.
CutlerC (2008) Brooklyn Style: Hip-hop Markers and Racial Affiliation among European Immigrants in New York City. International Journal of Bilingualism12(1-2): 7–24.
16.
DigmanJ (1990) Personality Structure: Emergence of the Five-factor Model. In RosenzweigMPorterL (eds) Annual Review of Psychology41. Palo Alto CA: Annual Reviews, 417–40.
17.
DigmanJInouyeJ (1986) Further Specification of the Five Robust Factors of Personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology50: 116–23.
18.
EaglyA (1987) Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social Role Interpretation. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
Else-QuestNMHydeJSGoldsmithHHVan HulleCA (2006) Gender Differences in Temperament: A Meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin132: 33–72.
20.
EysenckH (1983) Psychophysiology and Personality: Extraversion, Neuroticism and Psychoticism. In GaleAEdwardsIA (eds) Physiological Correlates of Human Behavior, Vol III: Individual Differences and Psychopathology. London: Academic Press, 13–30.
21.
EysenckH (1992) A Reply to Costa and McCrae: P or A and C-The Role of Theory. Personality and Individual Differences13(8): 867–68.
22.
EysenckH (2006) The Biological Basis of Personality. Piscataway NJ: Transaction Publishers.
23.
FeingoldA (1994) Gender Differences in Personality: A Meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin116: 429–56.
24.
FoldesHJDuehrEEOnesDS (2008) Group Differences in Personality: Meta-analyses Comparing Five US Racial Groups. Personnel Psychology61(3): 579–616.
25.
GainesS (1995) Relationships between Members of Cultural Minorities. In WoodJTDuckS (eds) Understudied Relationships: Off the Beaten Track. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage, 51–88.
26.
GleesonJFRawlingsDJacksonHJMcGorryPD. (2005) Agreeableness and Neuroticism as Predictors of Relapse after First-episode Psychosis: A Prospective Follow-up Study. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease193(3): 160–69.
27.
GoldbergL (1990) An Alternative ‘Description of Personality': The Big-five Factor Structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology59: 1216–29.
28.
GoldbergLSweeneyDMerendaPHughesJ (1998) Demographic Variables and Personality: The Effects of Gender, Age, Education, and Ethnic/Racial Status on Self-descriptions of Personality Attributes. Personality and Individual Differences24(3): 393–403.
29.
GurtmanM (1992) Construct Validity of Interpersonal Personality Measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology63(1): 105–18.
30.
GuttmanL (1954) A New Approach to Factor Analysis: The Radex. In LazarsfieldP (ed.) Mathematical Thinking in the Social Sciences. Glencoe IL: Free Press, 258–348.
31.
GuttmanL (1957) Empirical Verification of the Radex Structure of Mental Abilities and Personality Trait. Educational and Psychological Measurement17: 391–407.
32.
GuttmanL (1968) A General Nonmetric Technique for Finding the Smallest Co-ordinate Space for a Configuration of Points. Psychometrika33: 469–506.
33.
GuttmanL (1986) Coefficients of Polytonicity and Monotonicity. In KotzSJohnsonNReadC (eds) Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences Vol. 7. New York: John Wiley, 80–87.
34.
GuttmanL (1992) The Irrelevance of Factor Analysis for the Study of Group Differences. Multivariate Behavioral Research27(2): 175–204.
35.
GuttmanLLevyS (1987) Similarity Structure Analysis (SSAR) of European Elections. In JanssenJMarcotorchinoJProthJM (eds) Data Analysis: The Ins and Outs of Solving Real Problems. New York: Plenum Press, 193–204.
36.
GuttmanRGreenbaumC (1998) Facet Theory: Its Development and Current Status. European Psychologist3(1): 13–36.
37.
GuttmanRZoharA (1987) Spouse Similarities in Personality Items: Changes over Years of Marriage. Behavior Genetics17: 179–89.
38.
GuttmanRZoharAWillermanLKahnemanI. (1988) Spouse Similarities in Personality Traits for Intra- and Interethnic Marriages in Israel. Personality and Individual Differences9: 763–70.
39.
HofsteeWde RaadBGoldbergL (1992) Integration of the Big Five and Circumplex Approaches to Trait Structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology63: 146–63.
40.
Illinois State Board of Education (2009) New US Department of Education Race and Ethnicity Data Standards: Data Collection and Reporting Changes Starting School Year 2010-11. Illinois State Board of Education, available athttp://www.isbe.state.il.us/research/pdfs/race_ethnicity_standards.pdf.
41.
International Personality Item Pool (2001) A Scientific Collaboratory for the Development of Advanced Measures of Personality Traits and Other Individual Differences. Available athttp://ipip.ori.org.
42.
Jensen-CampbellLARosselliMWorkmanKASantisiMRiosJDBojanD (2002) Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, and Effortful Control Processes. Journal of Research in Personality36 (5): 476–89.
43.
JohnO (1990) The ‘Big Five' Factor Taxonomy: Dimensions of Personality in the Natural Language and in Questionnaires. In PervonL (ed.) Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. New York: Guildford Press, 66–100.
44.
JohnsonJ (1994) Clarification of Factor Five with the Help of the AB5C Model. European Journal of Personality8: 311–34.
45.
LepineJColquittJErezA (2000) Adaptability to Changing Task Contexts: Effects of General Cognitive Ability, Conscientiousness, and Openness to Experience. Personal Psychology53(3): 563–93.
46.
LevyS (1985) Lawful Roles of Facets in Social Theories. In: CanterD (ed.) Facet Theory: Approaches to Social Theory. New York: Springer Verlag, pp. 59–96.
47.
LevyS (1994) Louis Guttman on Theory and Methodology: Selected Writings. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing Co.
48.
LynnRMartinT (1997) Gender Differences in Extraversion, Neuroticism, and Psychoticism in 37 Countries. Journal of Social Psychology137: 369–73.
49.
MaraunM (1997) Appearance and Reality: Is the Big Five the Structure of Trait Descriptors?Personality and Individual Differences22(5): 629–47.
50.
MaraunR.ChrisjohnR (1995) Radex Structure of Jackson's Basic Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences19(6): 881–92.
51.
McCraeRAllikJ (eds) (2002) The Five-factor Model of Personality across Cultures. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
52.
McCraeRCostaP (1985) Comparison of EPI and Psychoticism Scales with Measures of the Five-factor Model of Personality. Personality and Individual Differences6(5): 587–97.
53.
McCraeRCostaP (1987) Validation of the Five-factor Model of Personality across Instruments and Observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology52(1): 81–90.
54.
McCraeRJohnO (1992) An Introduction to the Five-factor Model and its Applications. Journal of Personality60(2): 175–215.
55.
MitchelsonJKWicherEWLeBretonJMCraigSB (2009) Gender and Ethnicity Differences on the Abridged Big Five Circumplex (AB5C) of Personality Traits: A Differential Item Functioning Analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement69(4): 613–35.
56.
MuellerGPlugEJS (2006) Estimating the Effect of Personality on Male and Female Earnings. Industrial and Labor Relations Review60(1): 1–22.
57.
NettleDLiddleB (2008) Agreeableness is Related to Social-cognitive, but not Social-perceptual, Theory of Mind. European Journal of Personality22: 323–35.
58.
OmiMWinantH (1994) Racial Formations in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s, second edition. New York: Routledge.
59.
OnesDAndersonN (2002) Gender and Ethnic Group Differences on Personality Scales in Selection: Some British Data. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology75(3): 255–76.
60.
PoropatE (2009) A Meta-analysis of the Five-factor Model of Personality and Academic Performance. Psychological Bulletin135(2): 322–38.
61.
PukropRHerpertzSSassHSteinmeyerEM (1998) Special Feature: Personality and Personality Disorders. A Facet Theoretical Analysis of the Similarity Relationships. Journal of Personality Disorders12(3): 226–46.
62.
RajuN (2000) Notes Accompanying the Differential Functioning of Items and Tests (DFIT) Computer Program. Graded Response Model6: 30602–13.
63.
RobinsonMWilkowskiB (2006) Loving, Hating, Vacillating: Agreeableness, Implicit Self-esteem, and Neurotic Conflict. Journal of Personality74(4): 935–78.
64.
RoccasSSagivLSchwartzSHKnafoA (2002) The Big Five Personality Factors and Personal Values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin28(6): 789–801.
65.
SchmittDPRealoAVoracekMAllikJ (2008) Why Can’t a Man be More Like a Woman? Sex Differences in Big Five Personality Traits across 55 Cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology94(1): 168–82.
66.
SchwartzSHMelechGLehmannABurgessSHarrisMOwensV (2001) Extending the Cross-cultural Validity of the Theory of Basic Human Values with a Different Method of Measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology32: 519–42.
67.
ShermanRNaveCFunderD (2013) Situational Construal is Related to Personality and Gender. Journal of Research in Personality47(1): 1–14.
68.
StoughCDonaldsonCScarlataBCiorciariJ (2001) Psychophysiological Correlates of the NEO PI-R Openness, Agreeableness and Conscientiousness: Preliminary Results. International Journal of Psychophysiology41(1): 87–91.
69.
SulsJMartinRDavidJ (1998) Person-environment Fit and its Limits: Agreeableness, Neuroticism and Emotional Reactivity to Interpersonal Conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin24(1): 88–98.
