Motor activity consists of a large number of motor behaviors not placed under stimulus control. The Environmental Protection Agency defines motor activity in terms of “activity counts, ”and has incorporated it in the guidelines for the assessment of neurotoxicity. While motor activity testing has some enticing operating characteristics, a dose-related change in activity counts can reflect an effect on the nervous system only in the absence of systemic toxicity. Furthermore, when a motor activity effect has been documented, ancillary data or further testing is needed to determine whether this effect is indeed adverse. In addition, the results of a motor activity test do not usually provide information about either the origin of the problem, or the follow-up tests that need to be conducted.
Ammassari-TeuleM., D'AMATOF.R., SansoneM., OliverioA. (1986). Avoidance facilitation in adult mice by prenatal administration of the nootropic drug oxiracetam.Pharmacol. Res. Comm.18: 1169–1176.
2.
DewsP.B. (1962). Psychopharmacology. In: Experimental Foundations of Clinical Psychology (BachrachA.J., ed.), pp. 423–441. Basic Books, New York.
3.
DewsP.B. (1975). An Overview of Behavioral Toxicology. In: Behavioral Toxicology (WeissB., LatiesV.G., eds.), pp. 439–445. Plenum Press, New York.
4.
FEDERAL REGISTER (1985a). Motor activity. Vol. 50 (188), Sept. 27, p. 39461, Sect. 798.6200 (e)(2)(i)(B).
5.
FEDERAL REGISTER (1985b). Motor activity. Vol. 50 (188), Sept. 27, p. 39460, Sect. 798.6200 (a)(3).
6.
FEDERAL REGISTER (1985c). Motor activity. Vol. 50 (188), Sept. 27, p. 39460, Sect. 798.6200(b)(1).
7.
FEDERATION OF AMERICAN SOCIETIES FOR EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY (1986). Predicting Neurotoxicity and Behavioral Dysfunction from Preclinical Toxicological Data, pp. 35–37, Washington, DC.
8.
GerberG.J., and O'SH AUGHNESSYD. (1986). Comparison of the behavioral effects of neurotoxic and systemically toxic agents: How discriminatory are behavioral tests of neurotoxicity? Neurobehav.Toxicol. Teratol.8: 703–710.
9.
Kern AnW.J., MullenixP.J., HopperD.L. (1987). Pattern recognition of rat behavior.Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.27: 559–564.
10.
KrsiakM., SteinbergH., and StolermanI.P. (1970). Uses and limitations of photocell activity cages for assessing effects of drugs.Psychopharmacologia (Berlin)17: 258–274.
11.
MitchellC.L., TilsonH.A., and CabeP.A. (1982). Screening for Neurobehavioral Toxicity: Factors to Consider. In: Nervous System Toxicology (MitchellC.L., ed.), pp. 237–245. Raven Press, New York.
12.
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES (1975). Principles for Evaluating Chemicals in the Environment, pp. 196–216. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
13.
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES (1977). Principles and Procedures for Evaluating the Toxicity of Household Substances, pp. 111–118. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
14.
PerrotD., GuillaumeC., DelafosseD., BouffardY., FauvetM., BouletreauP., and MotinJ. (1985). Intoxication aiguë par l'eau induite par l'oxytocine.Ann. Fr. Anesth. Réanim.4: 418–420.
15.
RafalesL.S. (1986). Assessment of Locomotor Activity. In: Neurobehavioral Toxicology (AnnauZ., ed.), pp. 54–68. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
16.
ReiterL.W. (1978a). An introduction to neurobehavioral toxicology.Environ. Hlth. Perspect.26: 5–7.
17.
ReiterL.W. (1978b). Use of activity measures in behavioral toxicology.Environ. Hlth. Perspect.26: 9–20.
18.
ReiterL.W., and MacphailR.C. (1979). Motor activity: A survey of methods with potential use in toxicity testing.Neurobehav. Toxicol.1(Suppl. 1): 53–66.
19.
ReiterL.W., and MacphailR.C. (1982). Factors Influencing Motor Activity Measurements in Neurotoxicology. In: Nervous System Toxicology (MitchellC.L., ed.), pp. 45–65. Raven Press, New York.
20.
RobbinsT.W. (1977). A Critique of the Methods Available for the Measurement of Spontaneous Motor Activity. In: Handbook of Psychopharmacology (IversenL.L., IversenS.D., SnyderS.H., eds.), pp. 37–82. Plenum Press, New York.
21.
SetteW.F. (1987). Complexity of neurotoxicological assessment.Neurotox. Teratol.9: 411–416.
22.
SpielmannH., BomhardE., LehrE., LeuschnerF., PortigJ., SchlattererB., and StotzerH. (1987). Test guideline.Behavioral toxicity testing in animal experiments according to § 9, para. 1, No. 2 of the Chemical Act (Chemikaliengesetz) of the Federal Republic of Germany. Zbl. Bakt. Hyg. B185: 16–20.
23.
SpragueG.L. (1987). Be careful what label you use!Neurotox.8: 637–638.
24.
ThompsonT., and SchusterC.R. (1968). Behavioral Pharmacology.Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
25.
TilsonH.A., and MitchellC.L. (1984). Neurobehavioral techniques to assess the effects of chemicals on the nervous system.Ann. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.24: 425–450.
26.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (1986). Principles and Methods for the Assessment of Neurotoxicity Associated with Exposure to Chemicals. Environmental Health Criteria 60, Geneva.
