This study aimed to develop and validate the Attitude Toward Calculus Inventory (ATCI). Results from three studies are reported that establish the reliability and validity of this instrument. An examination of the factor structure confirms that student attitudes can be explained in terms of four factors: self-confidence, value, enjoyment, and motivation.
AdediwuraA. A. (2011). The development and confirmatory factor analysis of a scale for the measurement of gifted students attitude towards mathematics. World Journal of Education, 1(1), 52–62.
2.
ByrneB. M. (1989). A primer of LISREL: Basic applications and programming for confirmatory factor analytic models. New York, NY: Springer.
3.
ChapmanE. (2003). Alternative approaches to assessing student engagement rates. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 8(13). Retrieved February17, 2013, from http://www.PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=13
4.
DudaG.GarrettK. (2008). Blogging in the physics classroom: A research-based approach to shaping students’ attitudes toward physics. American Journal of Physics, 76(11), 1054–1065.
5.
FennemaE.ShermanJ. (1976). Fennema-Sherman mathematics attitudes scales: Instrument designed to measure attitudes toward mathematics, toward the learning of mathematics by females and males. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 7, 324–326.
6.
FogartyG.CretchleyP.HarmanC.EllertonN.KonkiN. (2001). Validation of a questionnaire to measure mathematics confidence, computer confidence, and attitudes towards the use of technology for learning mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 13(2), 154–160.
7.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural model with unobserved variables and measurement errors. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39–50.
8.
GalI.GinsburgL. (1994). The role of beliefs and attitudes in learning statistics: Towards an assessment framework. Journal of Statistics Education, 2(2), 1–18.
9.
HsinC. I.LinS. J.YehC. C. (2005). Pilot analysis of motivational strategies in learning calculus among technology college students. Journal of National University of Tainan, 39(2), 65–82.
10.
HuangC. H. (2011). Investigating the attitudes toward calculus of engineering students in Taiwan. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 9(2), 80–85.
KeS. P. (2012). A study on mathematics attitude, anxiety, and achievement among seventh grade students in areas of Taichung, Changhua, and Nantou. Master’s thesis, Changhua University of Education, Changhua, Taiwan.
13.
KraigerK.FordJ. K.SalasE. (1993). Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 311–328.
14.
LimS. Y.ChapmanE. (2013). Development of a short form of the attitudes toward mathematics inventory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(1), 145–164.
15.
LinS. H.HuangY. C. (2012). Development of learning engagement scale for college students. Psychological Testing, 59(3), 373–396.
16.
LoS. H. (2011). A case study on the relationship of mathematics anxiety, mathematics attitude and mathematics achievement among elementary school students in Toufen area of Miaoli. Master’s thesis, Hsinchu University of Education, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
17.
MaX.KishorN. (1997). Assessing the relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(1), 26–47.
18.
MiddletonA. J.SpaniasA. P. (1999). Motivation for achievement in mathematics: Findings, generalizations and criticisms of the research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30 (1), 65–88.
19.
NealeD. C. (1969). The role of attitude in learning mathematics. Arithmetic Teacher, 16, 631–640.
20.
NguyenD. M.HsiehY. C.AllenG. D. (2006). The impact of web-based assessment and practice on students’ mathematics learning attitudes. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 25(3), 251–279.
21.
NoarS. M. (2003). The role of structural equation modeling in scale development. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(4), 622–647.
22.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
23.
OrhunN. (2007). An investigation into the mathematics achievement and attitude towards mathematics with respect to learning style according to gender. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38(3), 321–333.
24.
PintrichP. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459–470.
25.
RivesB. S. (1992). A structural model of factors relating to success in calculus, college algebra and developmental mathematics. Dissertation Abstract International, 5309A, 3134.
26.
RuffellM.MasonJ.AllenB. (1998). Studying attitude to mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 35, 1–18.
27.
SaltaK.TzougrakiC. (2004). Attitudes toward chemistry among 11th grade students in high schools in Greece. Science Education, 88(4), 535–547.
28.
SinghK.GranvilleM.DikaS. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323–332.
29.
TanakaJ. S. (1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
30.
TapiaM.MarshG. E.II. (2004). An instrument to measure mathematics attitudes. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 8(2), 16–21.
TingM. U. (2008). A study on the learning effectiveness of the calculus in different e-learning types and happiness. Journal of National Huwei University of Science & Technology, 27(2), 75–94.
33.
TsoT. C.ChiangF. K.LuH. C.SunC. S. (2008). An empirical study on students’ positive learning attitudes, competitive attitudes, motivation participating and suitability of platform in web-based mathematics competition. Kaohsiung Normal University Journal, 25, 25–46.
34.
YehC. C. (2007). The analysis of student differences in calculus learning: A use of fuzzy theory. Psychological Testing, 54(1), 175–196.
