The Math and Me Survey was designed to measure elementary students’ attitudes toward mathematics. The authors conducted content validation, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, item response theory, reliability, and external validity analyses to improve it and to test its psychometric properties. The final Math and Me Survey consists of two scales: Mathematical Self-Perceptions and Enjoyment of Mathematics.
AdamsR. (Ed.). (2005). PISA 2003 technical report. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
2.
AdelsonJ. L. (2006). Math and Me Survey. Unpublished instrument.
3.
AdelsonJ. L.McCoachD. B. (2010). Measuring the mathematical attitudes of elementary students: The effects of a 4-point or 5-point Likert scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 796-807.
4.
American Association of University Women. (1991). Shortchanging girls, shortchanging America. Washington, DC: Author.
5.
AndermanE. M.EcclesJ. S.YoonK. S.RoeserR.WigfieldA.BlumenfeldP. (2001). Learning to value mathematics and reading: Relations to mastery and performance-oriented instructional practices. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 76–95.
6.
AnjumR. (2006). The role of self-concept in mathematics achievement of primary school children. Pakistan Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4, 21–38.
7.
BanduraA. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 261–271.
8.
BanduraA. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147.
9.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10.
BanduraA. (1994). Self-efficacy. In RamachandranV. S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp 71–81). New York, NY: Academic Press.
11.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
BrownD. F.CanniffM. (2007). Designing curricular experiences that promote young adolescents’ cognitive growth. Middle School Journal, 39(1), 16–23.
14.
CalderonJ. L.MoralesL. S.LiuH.HaysR. D. (2006). Variation in the readability of items within surveys. American Journal of Medical Quality, 21, 49–56.
15.
ChipmanS. F. (2005). Research on the women and mathematics issue: A personal case history. In GallagherA. M.KaufmanJ. C. (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach (pp. 1–24). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
ColeD. A.MartinJ. M.PeekeL. A.SeroczynskiA. D.FierJ. (1999). Children’s over- and underestimation of academic competence: A longitudinal study of gender differences, depression, and anxiety. Child Development, 70, 459–473.
EcclesJ. S.WigfieldA. (1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents’ achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215–225.
21.
EcclesJ. S.WigfieldA. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.
22.
EcclesJ.WigfieldA.HaroldR. D.BlumenfeldP. (1993). Age and gender differences in children’s self- and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64, 830–847.
23.
EriksonE. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
24.
EriksonE. H. (1968). Identity, youth and crisis. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
25.
EriksonE. H. (1980). Identity and the life cycle (2nd ed.). New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
26.
FanX.ThompsonB. (2001). Confidence intervals about score reliability coefficients, please: An EPM guideline editorial. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 517–531.
27.
FennemaE.ShermanJ. A. (1976). Fennema-Sherman Mathematics Attitudes Scales: Instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by females and males. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 7, 324–336.
28.
FennemaE.ShermanJ. A. (1978). Fennema-Sherman Mathematics Attitudes Scales: Instruments designed to measure attitudes towards the learning of mathematics by females and males. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
29.
FleschR. F. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, 221–224.
30.
FredricksJ. A.EcclesJ. S. (2002). Children’s competence and value beliefs from childhood through adolescence: Growth trajectories in two male-sex-typed domains. Developmental Psychology, 38, 519–533.
31.
FriedmanD. B.Hoffman-GoetzL. (2006). A systematic review of readability and comprehension instruments used for print and web-based cancer information. Health Education and Behavior, 33, 352–373.
32.
FuchsM. (2002, August). Children and juveniles as respondents: Experiments on question order, response order and scale effects. Paper presented at the International Conference on Improving Statistics, Copenhagen, Denmark.
33.
GottfriedA. E.FlemingJ. S.GottfriedA. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 3–13.
34.
GottfriedA. E.MarcoulidesG. A.GottfriedA. W.OliverP. H.GuerinG. W. (2007). Multivariate latent change modeling of developmental decline in academic intrinsic math motivation and achievement: Childhood through adolescence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 317–327.
35.
HackettG.BetzN. E. (1989). An exploration of the mathematics self-efficacy/mathematics performance correspondence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 261–273.
36.
HambletonR. K.SwaminathanH.RogersH. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37.
HaytonJ. C.AllenD. G.ScarpelloV. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7, 191–205.
38.
JacobsJ. E.LanzaS.OsgoodD. W.EcclesJ. S.WigfieldA. (2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain difference across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73, 509–527.
39.
KincaidJ. P.FishburneR. P.RogersR. L.ChissomB. S. (1975). Derivation of new readability formula for navy enlisted personnel. Millington, TN: Navy Research Branch.
40.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.GoreP. A. (1997). Descriptive and predictive validity of academic self-concept, academic self-efficacy, and mathematics-specific self-efficacy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44, 307–315.
41.
LentR. W.LopezF. G.BieschkeK. J. (1991). Mathematics self-efficacy: Sources and relation to science-based career choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 424–430.
42.
LyonM. A. (1993). Academic self-concept and its relationship to achievement in a sample of junior high school students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 201–211.
43.
MarshH. W.BarnesJ.CairnsL.TidmanM. (1984). Self-Description Questionnaire: Age and sex effects in the structure and level of self-concept for preadolescent children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 5, 940–956.
44.
MarshH. W.ChessorD.CravenR.RocheL. (1995). The effects of gifted and talented programs on academic self-concept: The big fish strikes again. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 285–319.
45.
MarshH. W.RelichJ. D.SmithI. D. (1983). Self-concept: The construct validity of interpretations based upon the SDQ. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 173–187.
46.
MarshH. W.SmithI. D.BarnesJ. (1983). Multitrait-multimethod analyses of the Self-Description Questionnaire: Student-teacher agreement on multidimensional ratings of student self-concept. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 333–357.
47.
MarshH. W.SmithI. D.BarnesJ.ButlerS. (1983). Self-concept: Reliability, stability, dimensionality, validity, and the measurement of change. Journal of Educational Psychology, 5, 772–790.
48.
MartinM. O.PreuschoffC. (2008). Creating the TIMSS 2007 background indices. In OlsonJ. F.MartinM. O.MullisI. V. S. (Eds.), TIMSS 2007 technical report (pp. 281–338). Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
49.
McCoachD. B.AdelsonJ. L. (2010). Dealing with dependence (Part I): Understanding the effects of clustered data. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 152–155. doi:10.1177/001698621036307610.1177/0016986210363076
50.
MeyerD. K.TurnerJ. C.SpencerC. A. (1997). Challenge in a classroom: Students’ motivation and strategies in project-based learning. Elementary School Journal, 97, 501–521.
51.
MeyerM. R.KoehlerM. S. (1990). Internal influences on gender differences in mathematics. In FennemaE.LederG. C. (Eds), Mathematics and gender (pp. 60–95). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
52.
MiddletonJ. A.SpaniasP. A. (1999). Motivation for achievement in mathematics: Findings, generalizations, and criticisms of the research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 65–88.
53.
MulhernF.RaeG. (1998). Development of a shortened form of the Fennema-Sherman Mathematics Attitudes Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 295–306.
54.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
55.
NielsonI. L.MooreK. A. (2003). Psychometric data on the Mathematics Self-efficacy Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 128–138.
56.
PajaresF. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs and mathematical problem-solving of gifted students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 325–344.
57.
PajaresF.KranzlerJ. (1995). Self-efficacy beliefs and general mental ability in mathematical problem-solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 426–443.
58.
PajaresF.MillerD. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 193–203.
59.
PastorelliC.CapraraG. V.BarbaranelliC.RolaJ.RozsaS.BanduraA. (2001). The structure of children’s perceived self-efficacy: A cross-national study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 87–97.
60.
PettM. A.LackeyN. R.SullivanJ. J. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
61.
PhillipsD.ZimmermanM. (1990). The developmental course of perceived competence and incompetence among competent children. In SternbergR.KolligianJ. (Eds.), Competence considered (pp. 41–66). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
62.
PiagetJ. (1954). The construction of reality in the child (CookM., Trans.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
63.
PiagetJ. (1963). Origins of intelligence in children. New York, NY: Norton.
64.
PiagetJ. (1970). The science of education and the psychology of the child. New York, NY: Orion Press.
65.
PintrichP. R.ZushoA. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. In WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S. (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 249–284). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
66.
PreacherK. J.MacCullumR. C. (2003). Repairing Tom Swift’s electric factor analysis machine. Understanding Statistics, 2, 13–43.
67.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
68.
RenningerK. A.HidiS. (2002). Student interest and achievement: Developmental issues raised by a case study. In WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S. (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 173–195). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
69.
RussellD. W. (2002). In search of underlying dimensions: The use and abuse of factor analysis in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1629–1646.
70.
SandmanR. S. (1979). Mathematics Attitude Inventory (Mental Measurements Yearbook 09, No. 09089233). Abstract retrieved from Mental Measurements Yearbook.
71.
SchunkD. H. (1996, April). Self-efficacy for learning and performance. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
72.
SchunkD. H.GunnT. P. (1986). Self-efficacy and skill development: Influence of task strategies and attributions. Journal of Educational Research, 79, 238–244.
73.
SchunkD. H.PajaresF. (2002). The development of academic self-efficacy. In WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S. (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 15–31). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
74.
ScottJ. (1997). Children as respondents: Methods for improving data quality. In LybergL.BiemerP.CoolinsM.deLeeuwE. D.DippoC.SchwarzN.TrewinD. (Eds.), Survey measurement and process quality (pp. 331–350). New York, NY: Wiley.
75.
ShavelsonR. J.BolusR. (1982). Self-concept: The interplay of theory and methods. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 3–17.
76.
SkaalvikE. M.SkaalvikS. (2006). Self-concept and self-efficacy in mathematics: Relation with mathematics motivation and achievement. In PrescottA. P. (Ed.), The concept of self in education, family and sports (pp. 51–74). New York, NY: Nova Science.
77.
StipekD. (2002). Good instruction is motivating. In WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S. (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 309–332). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
78.
TapiaM. (1996, November). The Attitudes Toward Mathematics Inventory. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Tuscaloosa, AL.
79.
TapiaM.MarshG. E. (2002, November). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Attitudes Toward Mathematics Inventory. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Chattanooga, TN.
80.
TapiaM.MarshG. E. (2004). An instrument to measure mathematics attitudes. Academic Exchange, 8(2), 16–21.
81.
ThompsonB. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
82.
Thorndike-ChristT. (1991). Attitudes toward mathematics: Relationships in mathematics achievement, gender, mathematics course-taking plans, and career interests. Bellingham, WA: Western Washington University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED347066)
83.
UrbinaS. (2004). Essentials of psychological testing. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
84.
ValentineJ. C.DuBoisD. L.CooperH. (2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 39,111–133.
85.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
86.
VygotskyL. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
87.
WeldyG. R. (1991). Stronger school transitions improve student achievement: A final report on a three-year demonstration project “Strengthening school transitions for students K-13.”Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
88.
WestC. K.FishJ. A.StevensR. J. (1980). General self-concept, self-concept of academic ability, and school achievement: Implications for “causes” of self-concept. Australian Journal of Education, 24, 194–213.
89.
WigfieldA.KarpathianM. (1991). Who am I and what can I do? Children’s self-concepts and motivation in achievement situations. Educational Psychologist, 26, 233–262.
90.
WilliamsT.WilliamsK. (2010). Self-efficacy and performance in mathematics: Reciprocal determinism in 33 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 453–466.
