The authors present the development of the Ethical and Legal Issues in Counseling Self-Efficacy Scale (ELICSES). The purpose of this article is threefold: (a) present a rationale for the ELICSES, (b) review statistical analysis procedures used to develop the ELICSES, and (c) offer implications for future research and counselor education.
American Counseling Association. (2005). Code of ethics. Alexandria, VA: Author.
2.
American School Counselor Association. (2010). Ethical standards for school counselors. Alexandra, VA: Author.
3.
BallardR. (1992). Short forms of the Marlowe–Crowne social desirability scale. Psychological Reports, 71, 1155–1160.
4.
BanduraA. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5.
BanduraA. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147.
6.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
7.
BanduraA. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In PajaresF.UrdanT. C. (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
8.
BargerS. (2002). The Marlowe–Crowne affair: Short forms, psychometric structure, and social desirability. Journal of Personality Assessment, 79, 286–305.
9.
BeretvasS. N.MeyersJ. L.LeiteW. L. (2002). A reliability generalization study of the Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 570–589.
10.
BodenhornN.SkaggsG. (2005). Development of the school counselor self-efficacy scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 38, 14–28.
11.
CohenJ. (1992). Power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
12.
CoreyG.CoreyM. S.CallananP. (2010). Issues and ethics in the helping professions. Melbourne, Australia: Brooks/Cole/Thomson Learning.
13.
Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs. (2009). 2009 CACREP standards. Alexandria, VA: Author.
14.
CostelloA. B.OsborneJ. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation, 10(7). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/pdf/v10n7.pdf
15.
CrockerL. M.AlginaJ. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
16.
CrowneD. P.MarloweD. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.
17.
DeVellisR. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
DillmanD. A.SmythJ. D.ChristianL. M. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
19.
DimitrovD. M. (2012). Statistical methods for validation of assessment scale data in counseling and related fields. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
20.
DrummondR. J.Jones (2010). Assessment procedures for counselors and helping professionals. Boston, MA: Pearson.
21.
DufreneR. L.GlosoffH. L. (2004). The Ethical Decision-Making Scale–Revised. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 37, 2–37.
22.
FabrigarL. R.WegenerD. T.MacCallumR. C.StrahanE. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299.
23.
FischerD. G.FickC. (1993). Measuring social desirability: Short forms of the Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 417–424.
24.
FloydF. J.WidamanK. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286–299.
25.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E.TathamR. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
26.
KocetM. M. (2006). Ethical challenges in a complex world: Highlights of the 2005 ACA code of ethics. Journal of Counseling and Development, 84, 228–234.
27.
LambieG. W.HagedornW. B.IevaK. P. (2010). Social-cognitive development, ethical and legal knowledge, and ethical decision making of counselor education students. Counselor Education and Supervision, 49, 228–246.
28.
LarsonL. M.DanielsJ. A. (1998). Review of the counseling self-efficacy literature. The Counseling Psychologist, 26, 179–218.
29.
LarsonL. M.SuzukiL. A.GillespieK. N.PotenzaM. T.BechtelM. A.ToulouseA. L. (1992). Development and validation of the counseling self-estimate inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 105–120.
30.
LentR. W.HillC. E.HoffmanM. (2003). Development and validation of the counselor activity self-efficacy scales. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 97–108.
31.
MertlerC. A.VannattaR. A. (2005). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods: Practical application and interpretation. Glendale, CA: Pyrczak.
32.
MitchellM. L.JolleyJ. M. (2004). Research design explained (5th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Wadsworth.
33.
OsborneJ. W.FitzpatrickD. C. (2012). Replication analysis in exploratory factor analysis: What it is and why it makes you analysis better. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(15). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/pdf/v17n15.pdf
34.
RestJ. R. (1986). Manual for the defining issues test. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Center for the Study of Ethical Development.
35.
ShihT.FanX. (2009). Comparing response rates in e-mail and paper surveys: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 4(1), 26–40.
36.
SinkC. A.StrohH. (2006). Practical significance: Use of effect sizes in school counseling research. Professional School Counseling, 9, 401–411.
37.
StrahanR.GerbasiK. (1972). Short, homogeneous versions of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 191–193.
38.
Van HornP. S.GreenK. E.MartinussenM. (2009). Survey response rates and survey administration in counseling and clinical psychology: A meta-analysis. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 69, 389–403.
39.
WestS. G.FinchJ. F.CurranP. J. (1995). Structural equation models with non-normal variables: Problems and remedies. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 56–75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
