This study evaluated a model linking internalization and dieting behaviors in a sample (n = 499) of Latina/o and White college students. Analyses revealed that the scales were invariant across ethnic and gender groups and generally supported the invariance of the proposed model across these groups. Analyses also revealed no ethnic mean differences between the constructs, but females did score higher than males on most constructs.
Augustus-HorvathC. L.TylkaT. L. (2009). A test and extension of objectification theory as it predicts disordered eating: Does women’s age matter?Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 253–265. doi:10.1037/a0014637
3.
BoieI. (2012). The intersection of cultural factors on Mexican American college women’s body image: A constructivist grounded theory (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses. (UMI No. 3508591)
4.
BreitkopfC.LittletonH.BerensonA. (2007). Body image: A study in a tri-ethnic sample of low income women. Sex Roles, 56, 373–380. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9177-x
5.
BuchananT. S.FischerA. R.TokarD. M.YoderJ. D. (2008). Testing culture-specific extension of objectification theory regarding African American women’s body image. Counseling Psychologist, 36, 697–718. doi:10.1177/ 0011000008316322
6.
CashT. F. (2002). The Situational Inventory of Body-Image Dysphoria: Psychometric evidence and development of a short form. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 32, 362–366. doi:10.1002/eat.
7.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504.
8.
ChenF. F.RussoN. F. (2010). Measurement invariance and the role of body consciousness in depressive symptoms. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 405–417. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.010.01585.x
9.
ChenF. F.SousaK. H.WestS. G. (2005). Testing measurement invariance of second-order factor models. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 471–492.
10.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
DeniousJ. E.RussoN. F.RubinL. R. (2004). The role of shame in socio- and subcultural influences on disordered eating. In PaludiM. (Ed.), Praeger guide to the psychology of gender (pp. 219–238). Westport, CT: Praeger.
12.
DimitrovD. M. (2010). Testing for factorial invariance in the context of construct validation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 43, 121–149. doi:10.1177/0748175610373459
13.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.
14.
GarnerD. M.OlmstedM. P.BohrY.GarfinkelP. E. (1982). The Eating Attitudes Test: Psychometric features and clinical correlates. Psychological Medicine, 12, 871–878. doi:10.1017/S0033291700049163
15.
GordonK. H.PerezM.JoinerT. E. (2002). The impact of racial stereotypes on eating disorder recognition. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 32, 219–224. doi:10.1002/eat.10070
16.
GrabeS.HydeJ. S.LindbergS. M. (2007). Body objectification and depression in adolescents: The role of gender, shame, and rumination. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 164–175.
17.
HakstianA. R.WhalenT. E. (1976). A k-sample significance test for independent alpha coefficients. Psychometrika, 51, 393–413.
18.
HallsworthL.WadeT.TiggemannM. (2005). Individual differences in male body image: An examination of self-objectification in recreational body builders. British Journal of Health Psychology, 10, 453–465. doi:10.1348/135910705x26966
19.
HeblM. R.KingE. B.LinJ. (2004). The swimsuit becomes us all: Ethnicity, gender, and vulnerability to self-objectificationPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1322–1331. doi:10.1177/0146167204264052
20.
HeinbergL. J.ThompsonJ. K.StormerS. (1995). Development and validation of the sociocultural attitudes towards appearance questionnaire. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 17(1), 81–89.
21.
HuL.BentlerP. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
22.
JacobiC.HaywardC.deZwaanM.KraemerH.AgrasW. (2004). Coming to terms with risk factors for eating disorders: Application of risk terminology and suggestions for a general taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 19–65.
23.
JamesL. R.MulaikS. A.BrettJ. M. (2006). A tale of two methods. Organizational Research Methods, 9, 233–244.
24.
Kashubeck-WestS.MintzL. B.SaundersK. J. (2001). Assessment of eating disorders in women. Counseling Psychologist, 29, 662–694. doi:10.1177/0011000001295003
25.
LittleT. D.SlegersD. W.CardN. A. (2006). A non-arbitrary method of identifying and scaling latent variables in SEM and MACS models. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 59-72. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1301_3
26.
LubkeG. H.MuthénB. O. (2004). Applying multi-group confirmatory factor models for continuous outcomes to Likert scale data complicates meaningful group comparisons. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 514–534.
27.
MarshH. W.HauK. T.WenZ. L. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralising Hu & Bentler (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
28.
MarshH. W.HocevarD. (1985). The application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First and higher order factor structures and their invariance across age groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 562–582.
29.
McKinleyN.HydeJ. (1996). The Objectified Body Consciousness Scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00467.x
30.
MillsapR. E. (2011). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. New York, NY: Routledge.
MitchellK. S.MazzeoS. E. (2009). Evaluation of a structural model of objectification theory and eating disorder symptomatology among European American and African American undergraduate women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 384–395.
33.
MoradiB. (2010). Addressing gender and cultural diversity in body image: Objectification theory as a framework for integrating theory and grounding research. Sex Roles, 63, 138–148. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9824-0
34.
MoradiB.DirksD.MattesonA. V. (2005). Roles of sexual objectification experiences and internalization of standards of beauty in eating disorder symptomatology: A test and extension of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 420–428. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.420
35.
MoradiB.HuangY. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398.
36.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
NollS. M.FredricksonB. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636. doi:10.1111/ j.1471-6402.1998. tb00181.x
40.
PopeH. G.OlivardiaR.BorowieckiJ. J.CohaneG. H. (2001). The growing commercial value of the male body: A longitudinal survey advertising in women’s magazines. Psychoterhapy and Psyhosomatics, 70, 189–192.
41.
SassD. A. (2011). Testing measurement invariance and comparing latent means within a confirmatory factor analysis framework. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 347–363. doi:10.1177/0734282911406661
42.
SassD. A.SchmittT. A.MarshH. W. (2012, April). Evaluating model fit with ordered categorical data within a measurement invariance framework: A comparison of estimators. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
43.
SchmittT. A.SassD. A. (2011). Rotation criteria and hypothesis testing for exploratory factor analysis: Implications for factor pattern loadings and interfactor correlations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71, 95–113. doi:10.1177/0013164410387348
44.
ShawH.RamirezL.TrostA.RandallP.SticeE. (2004). Body image and eating disturbances across ethnic groups: More similarities than differences. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18(1), 12–18. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.18.1.12
45.
SticeE.MartiC. N.SpoorS.PresnellK.ShawI. (2008). Dissonance and healthy weight eating disorder prevention programs: Long-term effects from a randomized efficacy trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 329–340. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.76.2.329
46.
SlaterA.TiggemannM. (2010). Body image and disordered eating in adolescent girls and boys. Sex Roles, 63, 42–49. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9794-2
47.
TabachnickG. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Experimental designs using ANOVA. Belmont, CA: Duxbury.
48.
ThompsonJ.van den BergP.RoehrigM.GuardaA. S.HeinbergL. J. (2004). The Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Scale-3 (SATAQ-3): Development and validation. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 35, 293–304. doi:10.1002/eat.10257
49.
TiggemannM.KuringJ. K. (2004). The role of body objectification in disordered eating and depressed mood. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 299–311. doi:10.1348/ 0144665031752925
50.
TylkaT. L.HillS. (2004). Objectification theory as it relates to disordered eating among college women. Sex Roles, 51, 719–730. doi:10.1007/s11199-004-0721-2
51.
TylkaT. L.SabikN. J. (2010). Integrating social comparison theory and self-esteem within objectification theory to predict women’s disordered eating. Sex Roles, 63, 138–148. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9785-3
WisemanM. C.MoradiB. (2010). Body image and eating disorder symptoms in sexual minority men: A test and extension of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 154–166. doi:10.1037/a0018937
54.
WoodN. A.PetrieT. A. (2010). Body dissatisfaction, ethnic identity, and disordered eating among African American women. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 141–153. doi:10.1037/a/0018922
