Genetically modified (GM) foods have attracted a great deal of controversy. While some consumers and organizations regard GM foods as safe, many other consumers and organizations remain concerned about their potential health risks. The results of three studies suggest that consumers respond differently to persuasive messages regarding GM foods on the basis of their preexisting attitudes. Weak anti-GM consumers tend to comply with a variety of pro-GM messages. In contrast, strong anti-GM consumers exhibit message-opposing behavior. Moreover, they respond just as negatively to a safety message (claiming that GM foods are safe) as to a risk message (claiming that GM foods are unsafe). The mechanism underlying these effects is consumers’ perceived health risk. A benefit message claiming that GM foods are beneficial (e.g., more nutritious than their conventional counterparts) is a better alternative for strong anti-GM consumers. Finally, the results suggest that persuasive messages do not significantly change pro-GM consumers’ evaluations of these foods.
AjzenIcekFishbeinMartin (2005), “The Influence of Attitudes on Behavior,” in The Handbook of Attitudes, AlbarracínDoloresJohnsonBlair T.ZannaMark P., eds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 173–221.
3.
BiswasDipayanBiswasAbhijitDasNeel (2006), “The Differential Effects of Celebrity and Expert Endorsements on Consumer Risk Perceptions: The Role of Consumer Knowledge, Perceived Congruency, and Product Technology Orientation,” Journal of Advertising, 35 (2), 17–31.
4.
BizerGeorge Y.TormalaZakary L.RuckerDerek D.PettyRichard E. (2006), “Memory-Based Versus On-line processing: Implications for Attitude Strength,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42 (5), 646–53.
5.
BlockLauren G.WilliamsPatti (2002), “Undoing the Effects of Seizing and Freezing: Decreasing Defensive Processing of Personally Relevant Messages,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32 (4), 803–30.
6.
BlockLauren G.GrierSonya A.ChildersTerry L.DavisBrennanEbertJane E.J.KumanyikaShiriki, et al. (2011), “From Nutrients to Nurturance: A Conceptual Introduction to Food Well-Being,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 30 (1), 5–13.
7.
BrehmJack W. (1966), A Theory of Psychological Reactance. Oxford, UK: Academic Press.
8.
BrileyDonnel A.ShrumL.J.Wyer JrRobert S.. (2013), “Factors Affecting Judgments of Prevalence and Representation: Implications for Public Policy and Marketing,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 32 (Special Issue), 112–18.
9.
BublitzMelissa G.PeracchioLaura A.AndreasenAlan R.KeesJeremyKidwellBlairMillerElizabeth Gelfand, et al. (2013), “Promoting Positive Change: Advancing the Food Well-Being Paradigm,” Journal of Business Research, 66 (8), 1211–18.
ChenMei-Fang (2008), “An Integrated Research Framework to Understand Consumer Attitudes and Purchase Intentions toward Genetically Modified Foods,” British Food Journal, 110 (6), 559–79.
12.
ClarksonJoshua J.TormalaZakary L.RuckerDerek D. (2008), “A New Look at the Consequences of Attitude Certainty: The Amplification Hypothesis,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95 (4), 810–25.
13.
CookAndrew J.KerrGeoff N.MooreKevin (2002), “Attitudes and Intentions Towards Purchasing GM Food,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 23 (5), 557–72.
FeldmanJack M.LynchJohn G. Jr. (1988), “Self-Generated Validity and Other Effects of Measurement on Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 73 (3), 421–35.
17.
FitzsimonsGavan J. (2008), “Death to Dichotomizing,” Journal of Consumer Research, 35 (1), 5–8.
18.
FrewerLynn J. (2003), “Societal Issues and Public Attitudes towards Genetically Modified Foods,” Trends Food Sci Technol, 14 (5), 319–32.
19.
FrewerLynn J.HowardChayaShepherdRichard (1996), “Effective Communication About Genetic Engineering and Food,” British Food Journal, 4 (5), 48–52.
20.
FunkCaryKennedyBrian (2016), The New Food Fights: U.S. Public Divides over Food Science. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
GreeneCatherineWechslerSeth J.AdaljaAaronHansonJames (2016), “Economic Issues in the Coexistence of Organic, Genetically Engineered (GE), and Non-GE Crops,” Economic Information Bulletin 232929, USDA, Economic Research Service, https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersib/232929.html.
24.
HayesAndrew F. (2013), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford Press.
25.
HigginsTory E. (1989), “Knowledge Accessibility and Activation: Subjectivity and Suffering from Unconscious Sources,” in Unintended Thought, UlemanJames S.BarghJohn A., eds. New York: Guilford Press, 75–123.
26.
HofstedeGeert (1980), Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.
27.
HylandMichaelBirrellJames (1979), “Government Health Warnings and the ‘Boomerang’ Effect,” Psychological Reports, 44 (2), 643–47.
28.
JohnsonDavidO’ConnorSiobhan (2015), “These Charts Show Every Genetically Modified Food People Already Eat in the U.S,” Time (April 30), http://time.com/3840073/gmo-food-charts/.
29.
KeesJeremyScot BurtonJ.AndrewsCraigKozupJohn (2010), “Understanding How Graphic Pictorial Warnings Work on Cigarette Packaging,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 29 (2), 265–76.
30.
Krosnick JonA.AbelsonRobert P. (1992), “The Case for Measuring Attitude Strength in Surveys,” in Questions About Questions: Inquiries into the Cognitive Bases of Surveys, TanurJudith M., ed. New York: Russell Sage, 177–203.
31.
Krosnick JonA.AbelsonRobert P.BoningerDavid S.ChuangYao C.BerentMatthew K.CarnotCatherine G. (1993), “Attitude Strength: One Construct or Many Related Constructs?” Journal of Personality and “Social Psychology, 65 (6), 1132–51.
32.
KundaZiva (1990), “The Case for Motivated Reasoning,” Psychological Bulletin, 108 (3), 480–98.
33.
LazardAllisonAtkinsonLucy (2015), “Putting Environmental Infographics Center Stage: The Role of Visuals at The Elaboration Likelihood Model’s Critical Point of Persuasion,” Science Communication, 37 (1), 6–33.
MagnussonMaria K.ArvolaAnneHurstiUlla-Kaisa KoivistoÅbergLarsSjödénPer-Olow (2001), “Attitudes Towards Organic Foods Among Swedish Consumers,” British Food Journal, 103 (3), 209–27.
36.
MaioGregory R.OlsonJames M. (1995), “The Effect of Attitude Dissimulation on Attitude Accessibility,” Social Cognition, 13 (2), 127–44.
37.
MilesSusanFrewerLynn J. (2001), “Investigating Specific Concerns About Different Food Hazards,” Food Quality and Preference, 12 (1), 47–61.
38.
MorrinMaureen (1999), “The Impact of Brand Extensions on Parent Brand Memory Structures and Retrieval Processes,” Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (4), 517–25.
39.
MussweilerThomas (2003), “Comparison Processes in Social Judgment: Mechanisms and Consequences,” Psychological Review, 110 (3), 472–89.
40.
NASEM (2016), Genetically Engineered Crops: Experiences and Prospects. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
41.
NyhanBrendanReiflerJason (2010), “When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions,” Political Behavior, 32 (2), 303–30.
42.
NyilasyGergelyGangadharbatlaHarsha (2016), “How to Reach Green Consumers on the Internet? Digital and Social Media Strategies for Addressing the Environmentally Conscious,” in American Academy of Advertising Conference Proceedings, 32–45.
PechmannCornelia (1997), “Does Antismoking Advertising Combat Underage Smoking: A Review of Past Practices and Research,” in Social Marketing: Theoretical and Practical Perspectives, GoldbergMarvin E.FishbeinMartinMiddlestadtSusan E., eds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 189–216.
45.
PechmannCornelia (2001), “A Comparison of Health Communication Models: Risk Learning Versus Stereotype Priming,” Media Psychology, 3 (2), 189–210.
PettyRichardKrosnickJon A. (2014), Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences. New York: Psychology Press.
49.
PhamNguyenMandelNaomiMoralesAndrea C. (2016), “Messages from the Food Police: How Food-Related Warnings Backfire Among Dieters,” Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 1 (1), 175–90.
50.
PhillipsDiane M.HallmanWilliam K. (2013), “Consumer Risk Perceptions and Marketing Strategy: The Case of Genetically Modified Food”, Psychology & Marketing, 30 (9), 739–48.
SanitiosoRasyidKundaZivaFongGeoffrey T. (1990), “Motivated Recruitment of Autobiographical Memories,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59 (2), 229–41.
53.
SlovicPaul (1987), “Perception of Risk,” Science, 236 (4799), 280–85.
54.
SlovicPaulFinucaneMelissa L.PetersEllenMacGregorDonald G. (2004), “Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts About Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality,” Risk Analysis, 24 (2), 311–22.
55.
SprancaMarkMinskElisaBaronJonathan (1991), “Omission and Commission in Judgment and Choice,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27 (1), 76–105.
StewartDavid W.MartinIngrid M. (1994), “Intended and Unintended Consequences of Warning Messages: A Review and Synthesis of Empirical Research,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 13 (1), 1–19.
58.
TyboutAlice M.CalderBobby J.SternthalBrian (1981), “Using Information Processing Theory to Design Marketing Strategies,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 73–9.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
