School Citizenship Education Through YPAR: What Works? A Mixed-Methods Study in Italy

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the quality of the processes of a Youth-led Participatory Action Research (YPAR) citizenship education project by examining a 2-year intervention that involved 43 Italian high school students. We collected qualitative data (focus groups with students and interviews with teachers) to capture participants’ perspectives, as well as longitudinal quantitative data to monitor the process over time (assessing school climate, perceived quality of participation, and group participation norms). The results revealed that YPAR was successful in reducing hierarchy, facilitating group activities, and recognizing youth voice, thus changing students’ perception of their school environment and views on participation and active citizenship. The intervention also changed teachers’ perceptions of students. YPAR proved to be a suitable option for citizenship education in school.

Keywords

school YPAR citizenship education students school climate

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albanesi

(2018). Citizenship education in Italian textbooks. How much space is there for Europe and active citizenship? Journal of Social Science Education, 17(2), 21–30. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1189294

Anderson

A. J.

(2019). A qualitative systematic review of youth participatory action research implementation in US high schools. American Journal of Community Psychology, 65(1–2), 242–257. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12389

Anyon

Bender

Kennedy

Dechants

(2018). A systematic review of youth participatory action research (YPAR) in the United States: Methodologies, youth outcomes, and future directions. Health Education and Behavior, 45, 865–878. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198118769357

Ballonoff Suleiman

Ballard

P. J.

Hoyt

L. T.

Ozer

E. J

. (2019). Applying a developmental lens to youth-led participatory action research: A critical examination and integration of existing evidence. Youth & Society, 53(1), 26–53. https://doi.org/0044118X19837871

Barrett

de Bivar Black

Byram

Faltýn

Gudmundson

van’t Land

Zgaga

(2018). Reference framework of competences for democratic culture: Vol. 1. Context, concepts and model. Council of Europe.

Barrett

Zani

(Eds.). (2015). Political and civic engagement. Multidisciplinary perspectives. Routledge.

Bombardelli

Codato

(2017). Country report: Civic and citizenship education in Italy: Thousands of fragmented activities looking for a systematization. Journal of Social Science Education, 16(2), 74–81. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2016.11.36

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brion-Meisels

Alter

(2018). The quandary of youth participatory action research in school settings: A framework for reflecting on the factors that influence purpose and process. Harvard Educational Review, 88(4), 429–454. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-88.4.429

10.

Bryman

(2007). Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 8–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906290531

11.

Cammarota

Fine

(2008). Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion. Routledge.

12.

Christens

B. D.

Peterson

N. A.

(2012). The role of empowerment in youth development: A study of sociopolitical control as mediator of ecological systems’ influence on developmental outcomes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(5), 623–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9724-9

13.

Creswell

J. W.

(2015). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE.

14.

Creswell

J. W.

Plano Clark

V. L.

(2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.

15.

Ekman

Amnå

(2012). Political participation and civic engagement: Towards a new typology. Human Affairs, 22(3), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-012-0024-1

16.

Eldh

A. C.

Årestedt

Berterö

(2020). Quotations in qualitative studies: Reflections on constituents, custom, and purpose. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920969268

17.

European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice. (2017). Citizenship education at school in Europe—2017. Eurydice Report.

18.

European Parliament and the Council. (2006). Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning. Official Journal of the European Union, 394, 10–18.

19.

Faison

Flanagan

(2001). Youth civic development: Implications of research for social policy and programs. Social Policy Report, 15(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2379-3988.2001.tb00040.x

20.

Ferreira

P. D.

Azevedo

C. N.

Menezes

(2012). The developmental quality of participation experiences: Beyond the rhetoric that “participation is always good!” Journal of Adolescence, 35(3), 599–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.09.004

21.

Flanagan

C. A.

Cumsille

Gill

Gallay

L. S.

(2007). School and community climates and civic commitments: Patterns for ethnic minority and majority students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 421–431. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.421

22.

Freire

(1970). The pedagogy of the oppressed. Seabury Press.

23.

Gingold

(2013). Building an evidence-based practice of action civics (CIRCLE Working Paper #78). www.civicyouth.org

24.

Jacquez

Vaughn

L. M.

Wagner

(2013). Youth as partners, participants or passive recipients: A review of children and adolescents in community-based participatory research (CBPR). American Journal of Community Psychology, 51(1), 176–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-012-9533-7

25.

Kagan

. (2012). La ricerca-azione partecipata e la psicologia di comunità [Participatory action research and community psychology]. In Zani

(Ed.), Psicologia di Comunità: Prospettive, Idee, Metodi (pp. 257–279). Carocci Editore.

26.

Kennedy

DeChants

Bender

Anyon

(2019). More than data collectors: A systematic review of the environmental outcomes of youth inquiry approaches in the United States. American Journal of Community Psychology, 63(1–2), 208–226. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12321

27.

Kohfeldt

Chhun

Grace

Langhout

R. D.

(2011). Youth empowerment in context: Exploring tensions in school-based YPAR. American Journal of Community Psychology, 47(1–2), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9376-z

28.

Lenzi

Vieno

Sharkey

Mayworm

Scacchi

Pastore

Santinello

(2014). How school can teach civic engagement besides civic education: The role of democratic school climate. American Journal of Community Psychology, 54(3–4), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-014-9669-8

29.

London

J. K.

(2007). Power and pitfalls of youth participation in community-based action research. Children Youth and Environments, 17(2), 406–432. www.jstor.org/stable/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.17.2.0406

30.

Niemi

(2002). Active learning—A cultural change needed in teacher education and schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(7), 763–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00042-2

31.

Nieuwelink

Dekker

Geijsel

ten Dam

(2016). “Democracy always comes first”: Adolescents’ views on decision-making in everyday life and political democracy. Journal of Youth Studies, 19(7), 990–1006. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2018.1529738

32.

Ozer

E. J.

(2016). Youth-led participatory action research. In Jason

Glenwick

D. S.

(Eds.), Handbook of methodological approaches to community-based research: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods (pp. 263–272). Oxford University Press.

33.

Ozer

E. J.

(2017). Youth-led participatory action research: Overview and potential for enhancing adolescent development. Child Development Perspectives, 11(3), 173–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12228

34.

Ozer

E. J.

Douglas

(2015). Assessing the key processes of youth-led participatory research: Psychometric analysis and application of an observational rating scale. Youth & Society, 47(1), 29–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X12468011

35.

Ozer

E. J.

Ritterman

M. L.

Wanis

M. G.

(2010). Participatory action research (PAR) in middle school: Opportunities, constraints, and key processes. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46(1–2), 152–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9335-8

36.

Prati

Mazzoni

Guarino

Albanesi

Cicognani

(2020). Evaluation of an active citizenship intervention based on youth-led participatory action research. Health Education & Behavior, 47(6), 894–904. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198120948788

37.

Rodríguez

L. F.

Brown

T. M.

(2009). From voice to agency: Guiding principles for participatory action research with youth. New directions for youth development, (123), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.312

38.

Rubin

B. C.

Ayala

Zaal

(2017). Authenticity, aims, and authority: Navigating youth participatory action research in the classroom. Curriculum Inquiry, 47, 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2017.1298967

39.

Schulz

Ainley

Fraillon

Kerr

Losito

(2010). ICCS 2009 International report: Civic knowledge, attitudes, and engagement among lower-secondary school students in 38 countries. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED520018

40.

Shamrova

D. P.

Cummings

C. E.

(2017). Participatory action research (PAR) with children and youth: An integrative review of methodology and PAR outcomes for participants, organizations, and communities. Children and Youth Services Review, 81, 400–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.08.022

41.

Sullivan

P. J.

Larson

R. W.

(2010). Connecting youth to high-resource adults: Lessons from effective youth programs. Journal of Adolescent Research, 25(1), 99–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558409350505

42.

Tzankova

Albanesi

Cicognani

(2021). Perceived school characteristics fostering civic engagement among adolescents in Italy. Frontiers in Political Science, 3, Article 611824. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.611824

43.

UNESCO, Education Sector, & Tang

(2014). Global citizenship education: Preparing learners for the challenges of the 21st century. UNESCO.