Self-harm is associated with mental illness and suicide risk. The present study aims to increase knowledge of adolescent girls’ pathways into and out of self-harm. The participants were 19 girls, 13 to 18 years of age, who were strategically selected from an outpatient care unit. A naturalistic multiple case study was done with personal interviews. The interviews were analyzed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis, and the capacity for “mentalization”—representation of behavior in terms of mental states—was measured with the Reflective Functioning Scale. The analysis of the topic “beginning self-harm” resulted in two meta-themes: (a) beginning self-harm as a way to handle difficult feelings and relational problems and (b) becoming influenced by peers to experiment with self-harm. The analysis of the topic “quitting self-harm” resulted in three meta-themes: (a) ambivalence toward help, treatment, and ending self-harm; (b) finding one’s own way of quitting self-harm; and (c) exploring self-harm together with the therapist. Three case stories illustrate variations in trajectories of change and capacity for mentalization. The findings suggest that self-harm may be a way of handling developmental challenges in autonomy and identity formation during adolescence. Adolescents need an opportunity to discover their own way of quitting self-harm. Variations in mentalization may provide for different pathways.
AbramsL. S.GordonA. L. (2003). Self-harm narratives of urban and suburban young women. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 18, 429-444. doi:10.1177/0886109903257668
2.
BinderP. E.MoltuC.HummelsundK.SagenS. H.HolgersenH. (2011). Meeting an adult ally on the way out into the world: Adolescent patients’ experiences of useful psychotherapeutic ways of working at an age when independence really matters. Psychotherapy Research, 21, 554-566. doi:10.1080/10503307.2011.587471
3.
BlattS. J. (2008). Polarities of experience. Relatedness and self-definition in personality development, psychopathology, and the therapeutic process. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
4.
BouchardM. A.LecoursS. (2008). Contemporary approaches to mentalization in the light of Freud’s project. In BuschF. (Ed.), Mentalization: Theoretical considerations, research findings, and clinical implications (pp. 103-129). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
5.
BrownT. B.KimballT. (2012). Cutting to live: A phenomenology of self-harm. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 39, 195-208. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00270.x
6.
ClarkinJ. F.YeomansJ. F.KernbergO. F. (2007). Psychotherapy for borderline personality: Focusing on object relations. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publications.
7.
CrittendenP. M. (2005). The Transition to Adulthood Attachment Interview (TAAI). Unpublished manuscript, Miami, FL.
8.
EriksonE. H. (1980). Identity and life cycle. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
9.
EvansR.HurrellC. (2016). The role of schools in children and young people’s self-harm and suicide: Systematic review and meta-ethnography of qualitative research. BMC Public Health, 16, 401-416. doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3065-2
10.
FlickU. (2002). An introduction to qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
FonagyP.GergerlyG.JuristE. L.TargetM. (2002). Affect regulation, mentalization and the development of the self. New York, NY: Other Press.
GeorgeC.KaplanN.MainM. (1985). The adult attachment interview protocol. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley.
14.
GullestadS. E. (1993). A contribution to the psychoanalytic concept of autonomy. The Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 16, 22-34. doi:10.1080/01062301.1993.10592286
15.
HaavindH. (2019). Livsformsintervjuet: En veiviser til subjektive erfaringer. In JansenA.AndenæsA. (Eds.), Hverdagsliv, barndom og oppvekst (pp. 26-56). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
16.
HawtonK.SaundersK. E. A.O’ConnorR. C. (2012). Self-harm and suicide in adolescents. The Lancet, 379, 2373-2382. doi:1.1016/S0140-6736(12)60322-5
17.
HawtonK.WittK. G.Taylor SalisburyT. L.ArensmanE.GunnellD.TownsendE.. . . HazellP. (2015). Interventions for self-harm in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 12, CD012013. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD012013
18.
HillC. E.KnoxS.ThompsonB. J.WilliamsE. N.HessS. A.LadanyN. (2005). Consensual qualitative research: An update. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 196-205. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.196
19.
JohnsenD. R.FergusonK.CopleyJ. (2017). Residential staff responses to adolescents’ self-harm: The helpful and unhelpful. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 22, 443-454. doi:10.1177/1359104516689378
20.
KlonskyE. D. (2007). The functions of deliberate self-injury: A review of the evidence. Clinical Psychology Review, 27, 226-239. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2006.08.002
21.
LarkinC.Di BlasiZ.ArensmanE. (2014). Risk factors for repetition of self-harm: A systematic review of prospective hospital-based studies. PLoS ONE, 9(1), e84282. doi:10.1371/annotation/b3dfd1b3-ada1-4f7e-89d4-a25ddf5d204a
22.
LevittH.PomervilleA.SuraceF. I. (2016). A qualitative meta-analysis examining clients’ experiences of psychotherapy: A new agenda. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 801-830. doi:10.1037/bul0000057
23.
LinehanM. M.ComtoisK. (1996). Lifetime parasuicide history. Unpublished work, University of Washington, Seattle.
24.
LiuH.-C.LiuS.-I.TjungJ.-J.SunF.-J.HuangH.-C.FangC.-K. (2017). Self-harm and its association with internet addiction and internet exposure to suicidal thought in adolescents. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 116, 153-160. doi:10.1016/j.jfma.2016.03.010
25.
MarchantA.HawtonK.StewartA.MontgomeryP.SingaraveluV.LloydK.. . . JohnA. (2017). A systematic review of the relationship between internet use, self-harm and suicidal behaviour in young people: The good, the bad and the unknown. PLoS ONE, 12(8), e0181722. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0181722
26.
McAndrewS.WarneT. (2014). Hearing the voices of young people who self-harm: Implications for service providers. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 23, 570-579. doi:10.1111/inm.12093
27.
McLeodJ. (2010). Case study research in counselling and psychotherapy. London, England: Sage.
28.
MorganC.WebbR. T.CarrW. J.KontopantelisE.GreenJ.Chew-GrahamC. A.. . . AshcroftD. M. (2017). Incidence, clinical management, and mortality risk following self-harm among children and adolescents: Cohort study. British Medical Journal, 359, Article j4351. doi:10.1136/bmj.j4351
29.
PfohlB.BlumN.ZimmermanM. (1997). Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality (SIDP-IV). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
30.
RossouwT. I.FonagyP. (2012). Mentalization-based treatment for self-harm in adolescents: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 51, 1304-1313. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2012.09.018
31.
SaundersK. E.SmithK. A. (2016). Interventions to prevent self-harm: What does the evidence say?Evidence-Based Mental Health, 19, 69-72. doi:10.1136/eb-2016-102420
32.
SheehanD. V.LecrubierY.SheehanK. H.AmorimP.JanavsJ.WeillerE.. . . DunbarG. C. (1998). The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI): The development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 59, 22-33.
33.
SiegelD. J. (2015). Brainstorm: The power and purpose of the teenage brain. New York, NY: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Penguin.
34.
SinclairJ.GreenJ. (2005). Understanding resolution of deliberate self-harm: Qualitative interview study of patients’ experiences. British Medical Journal, 330, Article 1112. doi:10.1136/bmj.38441.503333.8F
35.
SmithJ. A. (2015). Qualitative psychology. A practical guide to research methods. London, England: Sage.
36.
SolbakkenO. A.HansenR.MonsenJ. T. (2011). Affect integration and reflective function: Clarification of central conceptual issues. Psychotherapy Research, 21, 482-496. doi:10.1080/10503307.2011.583696
37.
SoyemotoK. L. (1998). The functions of self-mutilation. Clinical Psychology Review, 18, 531-554. doi:10.1016/S0272-7358(97)00105-0
38.
StänickeL. I.HaavindH.GullestadS. E. (2018). How do young people understand their own self-harm? A meta-synthesis of adolescents’ subjective experience of self-harm. Adolescent Research Review, 3, 173-191. doi:10.1007/s40894-018-0080-9
39.
SwannellS. V.MartinG. E.PageA.HaskingP.St JohnN. J. (2014). Prevalence of nonsuicidal self-injury in nonclinical samples: Systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 44, 273-303. doi:10.1111/sltb.12070
40.
TaylorT. L.HawtonK.FortuneS.KapurN. (2009). Attitudes towards clinical services among people who self-harm: Systematic review. British Journal of Psychiatry, 194, 104-110. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.107.046425
41.
WadmanR.VostanisP.SayalK.MajumderP.HarroeC.ClarkeD.. . . TownsendE. (2018). An interpretative phenomenological analysis of young people’s self-harm in the context of interpersonal stressors and supports: Parents, peers, and clinical services. Social Science and Medicine, 212, 120-128. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.021
42.
WhitlockJ. L.SelekmanM. (2014). Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) across the lifespan. In NockM. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of suicide and self-injury (pp. 133-154). Oxford, UK: Oxford Library of Psychology, Oxford University.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
