This article examines the possible implications of reintegrating the concept of context into identity theory. Through the analysis of a case study of one individual attempting to form an identity within the larger juxtaposed sociocultural contexts of premodernity, modernity, and postmodernity, the article demonstrates how diversity of sociocultural context is reflected not only in identity content but also in identity structure, suggesting multiple diverse identity structures and developmental trajectories. Erikson’s concept of identity configuration is reintroduced as a concept that can deal with the diversity and dynamics of the identity of the individual-in-context. The article claims that identity development should be redefined as the configuration of identity elements in a goal-oriented structure negotiated and co-constructed within context.
Adams, G. R., & Marshall, S. K. (1996). A developmental social psychology of identity: Understanding the person-in-context. Journal of Adolescence, 19, 429-442.
2.
Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469-480.
3.
Arnett, J. J. (2002). The psychology of globalization. American Psychologist, 57, 774-783.
4.
Arnett, J. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
Bar-Lev, M., & Krausz, E. (1989). Varieties of Orthodox religious behavior: A case study of yeshiva high school graduates in Israel. In E. Krausz (Ed.), Education in a comparative context (pp. 75-90). New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishing.
6.
Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
7.
Baumeister, R. F., & Muraven, M. (1996). Identity as adaptation to social, cultural, and historical context. Journal of Adolescence, 19, 405-416.
8.
Benet-Martinez, V., & Haritatos, J. (in press). Bicultural identity integration (BII): Components and psychosocial antecedents. Journal of Personality.
9.
Berger, P. L. (1979). The heretical imperative. New York: Anchor.
10.
Bosma, H. A., & Kunnen, E. S. (2001). Determinants and mechanisms in ego-identity development: A review and synthesis. Developmental Review, 21(1), 39-66.
11.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
Côté, J. E. (1996). Identity: A multidimensional approach. In G. R. Adams, R. Montemayor, & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.), Psychosocial development during adolescence (pp. 130-180). London: Sage.
14.
Côté, J. E. (2000). Arrested adulthood: The changing nature of maturity and identity. New York: New York University Press.
15.
Côté, J. E., & Levine, C. G. (1988). A critical examination of the ego identity status paradigm. Developmental Review, 8(2), 147-184.
16.
Côté, J. E., & Levine, C. G. (2002). Identity formation, agency, and culture: A social psychological synthesis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Côté, J. E., & Schwartz, S. (2002). Comparing psychological and sociological approaches to identity: Identity status, identity capital, and the individualization process. Journal of Adolescence, 25(6), 571-586.
18.
Cushman, P. (1990). Why the self is empty: Toward a historically situated psychology. American Psychologist, 45, 599-611.
19.
Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). New York: Norton.
20.
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crises. New York: Norton.
21.
Fox, D.,& Prilleltensky, I. (Eds.). (1997). Critical psychology: An introduction. London: Sage.
22.
Freud, S. (1961). The ego and the id. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 19, pp. 3-66). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1923)
23.
Gergen, K. J. (1968). Personal consistency and the presentation of the self. In C. Gordon & K. J. Gergen (Eds.), The self in social interaction: Classic and contemporary perspectives (Vol. I, pp. 299-308). New York: John Wiley.
24.
Gergen, K. J. (1991). The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New York: Basic Books.
25.
Gjerde, P. F. (2004). Culture, power, and experience: Toward a person-centeredcultural psychology. Human Development, 47(3), 138-157.
26.
Heilman, S. C., & Cohen, S. M. (1989). Cosmopolitans & parochials: Modern Orthodox Jews in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Hermans, H. J. (2001). The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture & Psychology, 7(3), 243-281.
28.
Kaniel, S. (2000). Thereligious Zionist: Towarda new era. Religious Education, 9(4), 453-473.
29.
Larson, R. W. (2002). Globalization, societal change, and new technologies: What they mean for the future of adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 12, 1-30.
30.
Lerner, R. M. (2002). Concepts and theories of human development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31.
Lifton, R. J. (1993). The protean self: Human resilience in an age of fragmentation. New York: Basic Books.
32.
Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
33.
Marcia, J. E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In J. Adelson (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 159-187). New York: John Wiley.
34.
Marcia, J. E., Waterman, A. S., Matteson, D. M., Archer, S. L., & Orlofsky, J. (Eds.). (1993). Ego identity: A handbook for psychosocial research. New York: Springer-Verlag.
35.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1994). A collective fear of the collective: Implications for selves and theories of selves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 568-579.
36.
McAdams, D. P. (1988). Power, intimacy and the life story: Personological inquiries into identity. New York: Guilford.
37.
McAdams, D. P. (1997). The case for unity in the (post)modern self: A modest proposal. In R. Ashmore & L. Jussim (Eds.), Self and identity: Fundamental issues (pp. 46-78). New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
Phinney, J. S., & Devich-Navarro, M. (1997). Variations in bicultural identification among African American and Mexican American adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 7, 3-32.
39.
Phinney, J., & Goossens, L. (Eds.). (1996). Identity development in context. Journal of Adolescence, 19(5), 401-500.
40.
Rattansi, A., & Phoenix, A. (1997). Rethinking youth identities: Modernist and postmodernist frameworks. In J. Bynner, L. Chisholm, & A. Furlong (Eds.), Youth, citizenship and social change in a European context (pp. 121-150). Aldershot, UK: Avebury.
41.
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43.
Sampson, E. E. (1985). The decentralization of identity: Toward a revised concept of personal and social order. American Psychologist, 40, 1203-1211.
44.
Sampson, E. E. (1988). The debate on individualism: Indigenous psychologies of the individual and their role in personal and societal functioning. American Psychologist, 43(1), 15-22.
45.
Sampson, E. E. (1993). Identity politics: Challenges to psychology’s understanding. American Psychologist, 48, 1219-1230.
46.
Schachter, E. P. (2002). Identity constraints: The perceived structural requirements of a “good” identity. Human Development, 45(6), 416-433.
47.
Schachter, E. P. (2004). Identity configurations: A new perspective on identity formation in contemporary society. Journal of Personality, 72(1), 167-200.
48.
Schachter, E. P. (2005). Erikson meets the postmodern: Can classic identity theory rise to the challenge?Identity, 5(2), 137-160.
49.
Schwartz, S. J. (2001). The evolution of Eriksonian and neo-Eriksonian identity theory and research: A review and integration. Identity, 1(1), 7-58.
50.
Shweder, R. A. (1990). Cultural psychology: What is it? In J. W. Stigler, R. A. Shweder, & G. Herdt (Eds.), Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development (pp. 1-43). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
51.
Shweder, R. A., Goodnow, J., Hatano, G., LeVine, R.A., Markus, H., & Miller, P. (1998). The cultural psychology of development: One mind, many mentalities. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & R. M. Lerner (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (Vol. 1, 5th ed., pp. 865-937). New York: John Wiley.
52.
Shweder, R. A., Much, N. C., Mahapatra, M., & Park, L. (1997). The “big three” of morality (autonomy, community, divinity), and the “big three” explanations of suffering. In P. Rozin & A. Brandt (Eds.), Morality and health (pp. 119-172). New York: Routledge.
53.
Super, C., & Harkness, S. (2002). Culture structures the environment for development. Human Development, 45, 270-274.
54.
Valsiner, J., Branco, A. U. & Dantas, C. M. (1997). Co-construction of human development: Heterogeneity within parental belief orientations. In J. E. Grusec & L. Kuczynski (Eds.), Parenting and children’s internalization of values (pp. 283-304). New York: John Wiley.
55.
van Hoof, A. (1999). The identity status field re-reviewed: An update of unresolved and neglected issues with a view on some alternative approaches. Developmental Review, 19, 497-556.
56.
Waterman, A. S. (1988). Identity status theory and Erikson’s theory: Communalities and differences. Developmental Review, 8, 185-208.
57.
Waterman, A. S. (1993). Developmental perspectives on identity formation: From adolescence to adulthood. In J. E. Marciaet al. (Eds.), Ego identity: A handbook for psychosocial research (pp. 42-68). New York: Springer-Verlag.
58.
Waterman, A. S. (1999). Identity, the identity statuses, and identity status development: A contemporary statement. Developmental Review, 19, 591-621.
59.
Yoder, A. E. (2000). Barriers to ego identity formation: A contextual qualification of Marcia’s identity status paradigm. Journal of Adolescence, 23(1), 95-106.
