Cautionary Tales of Classroom Misunderstandings

Abstract

The language environment of the classroom is a mutually constructed reality created by the teacher and students involved in that particular context. It is understandable that classroom observers on a once-only visit misinterpret, misunderstand, or overlook meanings being made by teachers and students. But teachers and students in their own classrooms can also misinterpret or overlook meanings being made by their companions in learning. By examination of examples taken from transcripts of classroom language in a variety of high school content areas, classroom practitioners can be alerted to communication situations in which learning and understanding have been lost. This chapter reports research on classroom discourse in Australian high schools, and the implications of the findings for teachers. Misunderstanding of each others' communication can occur for both teachers and students. The misunderstandings of students encountering unfamiliar or ambiguous subject-specific language are wellknown, as are the difficulties of students who are not at home with school language and its style of presentation. While these problems for students in understanding and expression have been explored in the past, such problems still continue to be overlooked, as indicated by examples taken from the transcripts. Less well documented is the ability of students to appear to be learning through engaging in classroom discourse while merely play-acting learning. Such students have an awareness of how classroom discourse operates which enables them to present a persuasive facade of understanding. In reality, all they understand is how to interact plausibly in classroom discourse. Some strategies for appropriate teacher-response to this range of misunderstandings are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barnes, D. , Britton, J. , & Rosen, H. (1971). Language, the learner and the school (rev. ed.). Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Barnes, D. (1976). From communication to curriculum. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Bellack, A. A. , Kliebard, H. M. , Hyman, R. T. , & Smith, F L. (1966). The language of the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.

Ervin-Tripp, S. (1982). Structures of control. In L. C. Wilkinson (Ed.), Communicating in the classroom. New York: Academic Press.

Green, J. L. & Harker, J. O. (1982) Gaining access to learning: Conversational, social and cognitive demands of group participation. In L. C. Wilkinson (Ed.), Communicating in the classroom. New York: Academic Press.

Green, J. & Weade, R. (1985). Reading between the words: Social cues to lesson participation. Theory into Practice, 24, 14-21.

Hull, R. (1985). The language gap. London: Methuen.

Lazarus, P. G. (1984). What children know and teach about language competence. Theory into Practice, 23, 225-231.

Lindgren, A. (1971). Pippi Longstocking. London: Oxford University Press.

10.

Martin, N. , Williams, P. , Wilding, J. , Hemmings, S. , & Medway, P. (1976). Understanding children talking. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

11.

Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

12.

Sinclair, J. M. & Coulthard, R. M. (1974). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.

13.

Stubbs, M. (1983). Language, schools and classrooms (Rev. Ed.). London: Methuen.