Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis.Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
2.
Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (1992). Primary care research: A multimethod typology and qualitative road map. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (pp. 3--28). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Eisner, E. (1993). Forms of understanding and the future of educational research. Educational Researcher, 22(7), 5–13.
4.
Ferguson, D. L. (1993). Something a little out of the ordinary: Reflections on becoming an interpretivist researcher in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 14(4), 35–43, 51.
5.
Ferguson, D., & Ferguson, P. (1993). Postmodern vexations: A reply to Meyer and Evans. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 18, 237--239.
6.
Ferguson, D., & Ferguson, P. (in press). The interpretivist view of special education and disability: The value of telling stories. In T. Skrtic & E. Gickling (Eds.), Exploring the theory/practice link in special education.New York: Teachers College Press.
7.
Gitlin, T. (1993, September). The left: Lost in the politics of identity. Harper's Magazine, 287, 16--19.
8.
Jacob, E. (1990). Alternative approaches for studying naturally occurring human behavior and thought in special education research. The Journal of Special Education, 24, 195--211.
9.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10.
Phillips, D. C. (1990). Postpositivistic science: Myths and realities. In E. G. Guba (Ed.), The paradigm dialog (pp. 31--45). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
Rorty, R. (1982). The consequences of pragmatism (Essays 1972--1980).Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
12.
Rorty, R. (1987). Science as solidarity. In J. S. Nelson, A. Magill, & D. N. McClaskey (Eds.), The rhetoric of the human sciences: Language and argument in scholarship and public affairs (pp. 38--52). Madison: University of Wisconsin.
13.
Ross, S. (1990). Positivism, pragmatism, and everyday life. Society, 28(1), 42--50.
14.
Schwandt, T. A. (1989). Solutions to the paradigm conflict: Coping with uncertainty. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 17, 379--407.
15.
Shank, G. (1993, January). Qualitative research? Quantitative research? What's the problem? Resolving the dilemma via a postconstructivist approach. Paper presented at the Research and Theory Division Membership Meeting, Association for Educational Communication and Technology, New Orleans.
16.
Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations. (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). New York: Macmillan.
17.
Wolcott, H. F. (1992). Posturing in qualitative inquiry. In M. D. LeCompte, W. L. Millroy, & J. Preissle (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 3--52). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
