The widespread failure of schools to match reading instruction to children's needs is the underlying theme of this article. Three of the factors that account for such a shortcoming are identified: large class size, dependence on basal reader programs, and questionable testing practices. How dependence on basal materials leads to a “standard” curriculum for all, beginning as early as kindergarten, receives special attention. The difficulty of getting teachers to provide differentiated instruction when they use basal materials is also discussed, with references to a year-long effort to alter one teacher's goals and behavior.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allington, R.L. (1980). Teacher interruption behaviors during primary-grade oral reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 371–377.
2.
Allington, R.L. (1983). The reading instruction provided readers of differing reading abilities. Elementary School Journal, 83, 548–559.
3.
Durkin, D. (1978–1979). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 481–533.
4.
Durkin, D. (1987a). A classroom observation study of reading instruction in kindergarten. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 2, 275–300.
5.
Durkin, D. (1987b). Testing in the kindergarten. Reading Teacher, 40, 766–770.
6.
Durkin, D. (1989). Curriculum reform: Teaching reading in kindergarten (Tech. Report No. 465). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Center for the Study of Reading.
7.
Shannon, P. (1985). Reading instruction and social class. Language Arts, 62, 604–613.
