The Quality of IEP Objectives and Their Relevance to Instruction for Students with Mental Retardation and Behavioral Disorders

Abstract

Individualized education program (IEP) plans for students with mild mental retardation and behavior disorders who attended integrated elementary and secondary schools were evaluated on the presence or absence of current, appropriate practices across the categories of generalization, functionality, and age-appropriateness. The IEPs were also analyzed by curricular area of emphasis. Students were observed in general and special education classrooms to discern the relationship, if any, between the written IEP and actual delivery of instruction. Results indicated that, although IEPs contained certain appropriate practices, their emphasis was almost solely on academic skills, to the exclusion of other important domains, such as vocational, recreation/leisure, and community integration. There was little indicated relationship between written IEPs and instruction.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Banbury, M. (1987). The IEP revisited. In A. Rotatori , M. Banbury , & R.A. Fox (Eds.), Issues in special education (pp. 42–50). New York: Mayfield.

Edgar, E. (1987). Secondary programs in special education: Are many of them justifiable? Exceptional Children, 53, 240–246.

Gerber, M.M. (1981). Economic considerations of "appropriate" education for exceptional children. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 2, 49–57.

Gilliam, J.E. , & Coleman, M.C. (1981). Who influences IEP committee decisions? Exceptional Children, 47, 335–397.

Hasazi, S.B. , Gordon, L.R. , & Roe, C.A. (1985). Factors associated with the employment status of handicapped youth exiting high school from 1979-1983. Exceptional Children, 51, 455–469.

Hunt, P. , Goetz, L. , & Anderson, J. (1986). The quality of IEP objectives associated with placement on integrated versus segregated school sites. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 11, 125–130.

Odel, S.J. , & Galtelli, B. (1980). The Individualized Education Program (IEP): Foundation for appropriate and effective instruction. In J.W. Schiefani , R.M. Anderson , S.J. Odel (Eds.), Implementing learning in the least restrictive environment: Handicapped children in the mainstream (pp. 235–288).Baltimore: University Park Press.

Patton, J.R. , Cronin, M.E. , Polloway, E.A. , Hutchinson, D. , & Robinson, G.A. (1989). Curricular considerations: A life skills orientation. In G. Robinson , J.R. Patton , E.A. Polloway , & L.R. Sargent (Eds.), Best practices in mental retardation (pp. 21–37). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.

Polloway, E.A. , Patton, J.R. , Epstein, M.H. , & Smith, T.E. C. (1989). Comprehensive curriculum for students with mild handicaps. Focus on Exceptional Children, 21, 1–12.

10.

Rusch, F.R. , & Phelps, A. (1987). Secondary special education and transition from school to work: A national priority. Exceptional Children, 53, 487–492.

11.

Ysseldyke, J.E. , Algozzine, B. , Richey, L. , & Graden, J. (1982). Declaring students eligible for learning disability services: Why bother with the data? Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 37–44.