The improvement and modification of special education programs should be based, in part, on data about the postschool outcomes of students who were in the programs. For schools and districts, this requires an established, school-based follow-up system that incorporates both the tracking of students and the application of postschool follow-up study procedures. This paper examines considerations for designing a postschool follow-up system in special education. It focuses on survey research techniques, which are widely used in the investigation of the postschool adjustment of former students with disabilities. Specific considerations and applications of survey methodology, particularly as they relate to students with disabilities, include, (a) identifying needed information; (b) mode of data collection; (c) questionnaire construction (wording and format, pretesting, reliability, and validity); (d) sample design; (e) contacting the sample; (f) response rates; (g) reporting survey procedures; and (h) tracking procedures. Sound procedures in designing and implementing follow-up systems for special education programs are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Borg, W.R., & Gall, M.D. (1983). Educational research: An introduction. New York: Longman.
2.
Bruininks, R.H., Lewis, D.R., & Thurlow, M.L. (Eds.). (1988). Assessing outcome. costs, and benefits of special education programs (Project Report Number 88-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, University Affiliated Program.
3.
Bruininks, R.H., McGrew, K.S., Thurlow, M.L., & Lewis, D.R. (1988, August). Dimensions of community adjustment among young adults with intellectual disabilities. Paper presented at the Eighth World Congress of the International Association for the Scientific Study of Mental Deficiency, Dublin, Ireland.
4.
Bruininks, R.H., & Thurlow, M.L. (1988). Evaluating post-school transition of secondary students with moderate to severe handicaps (Final Report). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, University Affiliated Program.
5.
Bruininks, R.H., Thurlow, M.L., Lewis, D.R., & Larson, N.W. (1988). Post-school outcomes for students in special education and other students one to eight years after high school. In R.H. Bruininks, D.R. Lewis, & M.L. Thurlow (Eds.), Assessing outcomes. costs. and benefits of special education programs (pp. 9–111) (Project Report Number 88-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, University Affiliated Program.
6.
Colton, D.A., & Kane, M.T. (1989, March). The effect of pre-letters on survey study response rates. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
7.
Delbecq, A.L., Van de Ven, A., & Gustafson, D. (1975). Group techniques for program planning. A guide to nominal group and Delphi. Chicago: Scott, Foresman.
8.
Dillman, D.A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
9.
Edgar, E. (1987). Secondary programs in special education: Are many of them justifiable?Exceptional Children,53(6), 555–561.
10.
Edgar, E. (1988). Markers of effectiveness at the secondary level in special education. Proceedings of the Research in Education of the Handicapped Project Director's Meeting (pp. 95–110). Washington, DC: Office of Special Education Programs.
Fowler, F.J. (1984). Survey research methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13.
Frey, J.H. (1983). Survey research by telephone. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14.
Green, K.E. (1989, March). Reluctant respondents: Differences between early, late and nonresponders to a mail survey. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
15.
Halpern, A.S., Nave, G., Close, D.W., & Nelson, D. (1986). An empirical analysis of the dimensions of community adjustment for adults with mental retardation in semi-independent living programs. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 12(3), 147–157.
16.
Hasazi, S.B., Gordon, L.R., & Roe, C.A. (1985). Factors associated with the employment status of handicapped youth exiting high school from 1978 to 1983. Exceptional Children, 51(6), 455–469.
17.
Johnson, D.R., Thurlow, M.L., Bruininks, R.H., Weatherman, R.G., & Sinclair, M.F. (1988). Design of secondary transition follow-along follow-up system. Project funded by U.S. Department of Education (Grant No. H158R80022).
18.
Lange, C., Thurlow, M.L., & Bruininks, R.H. (1988). Practitioner's views of follow-up and cost-benefit information needed to evaluate secondary instructional programs for handicapped students. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
19.
Levin, E., Zigmond, N., & Birch, J. (1985). A follow-up study of 52 learning disabled students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, 2–7.
20.
Light, R.J., & Pillemar, D.B. (1984). Summing up: The science of reviewing research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
Mathematica Policy Research. (1982). Videotape on "role and bias" and "probing."Princeton, NJ: Author.
22.
Mckensie Senter, S.J., & Houston, R. (1981). Perceptions of teacher educators, futurists, and laymen concerning the future of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 32(5), 35–39.
23.
Mithaug, D.E.. Horiuchi, C.N., & Fanning P.N. (1985). A report on the Colorado statewide follow-up survey of special education students. Exceptional Children, 51(5), 397–404.
24.
Moore, C.M. (1987). Group techniques for idea buildingBeverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25.
Putnam, J., & Bruininks, R.H. (1986). Future directions in de-institutionalization and education of children with handicaps: A Delphi investigation. Exceptional Children, 53, 58–61.
26.
Schalock, R.L., Wolzen, B., Ross, I., Elliott, B., Werbel, G., & Peterson, K. (1986). Postsecondary community placement of handicapped students. A five-year follow-up. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9(4), 295–303.
27.
Schroedel, J.G. (1984). Analyzing surveys on deaf adults: Implications for survey research on persons with disabilities. Social Science Medicine, 19(6), 619–627.
28.
Semmel, D.S., Cosden, M.A., & Konopak, B. (1985, April). A comparative study of employment outcomes for special education students in a cooperative work placement program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Council for Exceptional Children, Anaheim, CA.
29.
Sigelman, C.K., Schoenrock, C.J., Winer, J.L., Spanhel, C.L., Hromas, S.G., Martin, PW., Budd, E.C., & Bensberg, G.J. (1981). Issues in interviewing mentally retarded persons: An empirical study. In R.H. Bruininks, C.E., Meyers, B.B. Sigford, & K.C. Lakin (Eds.), Deinstitutionalization and community adjustment of mentally retarded people (pp. 114–129). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Deficiency.
30.
Sinclair, M.F., & Johnson, D.R. (1989). Minnesota post-school follow-up system: Procedures manual. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration.
31.
Thurlow, M.L., Bruininks, R.H., & Lange, C.M. (1989). Assessing post-school outcomes for students with moderate to severe mental retardation (Project Report No. 89-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration.
32.
Thurlow, M.L., Bruininks, R.H., Wolman, C., & Steffens, K. (1989). Occupational and social status of persons with moderate, severe, and profound mental retardation after leaving school. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration.
33.
Thurlow, M.L., Larson, N.W., & Bruininks, R.H. (1989). A follow-up analysis of students served in programs for emotional or behavior problems. Unpublished manuscript.
34.
Van Houten, T., & Hatty, H.P. (1987). How to conduct a citizen survey. Chicago: American Planning Association.
35.
Wehman, P., Kregel, J., & Seyfarth, J. (1985). Employment outlook for young adults with mental retardation. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 29(2), 90–99.
36.
White, W.J., Schumaker, J.B., Warner, M.M., Alley, G.R., & Deshler, D.D. (1980). The current status of young adults identified as learning disabled during their school career (Research Report No. 21). Lawrence: University of Kansas, Institute for Research in Learning Disabilities.
37.
Williams, P., & MacDonald, A. (1986). The effect of non-response bias on the results of two-stage screening surveys of psychiatric disorder. Social Psychiatry, 21. 182–186.
38.
Wolman, C., Bruininks, R.H., & Thurlow, M.L. (1989). Drop-outs and drop out programs: Implications for special education. Remedial and Special Education, 10(5), 6–20.
39.
Worthen, B.R., & Sanders, J.R. (1987). Educational evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. New York: Longman.
40.
Wyngaarden, M. (1981). Interviewing mentally retarded persons: Issues and strategies. In R.H. Bruininks, C.E. Meyers. B.B. Sigford, & K.C Lakin (Eds.), Deinstitutionalization and community adjustment of mentally retarded people (pp. 107–115). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Deficiency.
41.
Zigmond, N., & Thornton, H. (1985). Follow-up of postsecond-ary age learning disabled graduates and dropouts. Learning Disabilities Research. 1(1), 50–55.
