Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) combines mixed-ability cooperative learning teams and same-ability reading groups to teach reading, writing, and language arts in heterogeneous intermediate classes containing mainstreamed special education and remedial reading students. Students engage in a wide range of cooperative activities in four- to five-member teams. In reading, students read aloud with their partners, identify components of the story grammar; practice vocabulary, decoding, and spelling; and write a composition in response to stories. They receive direct instruction in reading comprehension skills and practice them in their teams. In writing/langauge arts, a structured writing process is used in which students work with teammates to plan, draft, revise, edit, and publish compositions. Two studies of the full CIRC model and one of the reading comprehension component found that the program increased the reading, language arts, and writing achievemnt of all students, including mainstreamed special education and remedial reading students.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CTB/McGraw-Hill. (1977). California achievement tests. Monterey, CA: Author.
2.
Dahl, P.R. (1979). An experimental program for teaching high speed word recognition and comprehension skills. In J.E. Button, T.C. Lovitt, & T. D. Rowland, (Eds.), Communication research in learning disabilities and mental retardation (pp. 33-65). Baltimore: University Park Press.
3.
Doctorow, M.Wittrock, M.C., & Marks, C. (1978). Generative processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 109-118.
4.
Durrell, D. & Catterson, J. (1980). Durrell analysis of reading difficulty. New York: Psychological Corp.
5.
Fitzgerald, J. & Spiegel, D. (1983). Enhancing children's reading comprehension through instruction in narrative structures. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14, 1-181.
6.
Hillocks, G. (1984). What works in teaching composition: A meta-analysis of experimental treatment studies. American Journal of Education, 93, 133-170.
7.
Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1980). Integrating handicapped children into the mainstream. Exceptional Children, 47, 90-98.
8.
Johnston, P. (1984). Assessment in reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 147-184). New York: Longman.
9.
Madden, N.A., & Slavin, R.E. (1983a). Mainstreaming students with mild academic handicaps: Academic and social outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 53, 519-569.
10.
Madden, N.A., & Slavin, R.E. (1983b). Cooperative learning and social acceptance of mainstreamed academically handicapped students. The Journal of Special Education, 17, 171-182.
11.
Madden, N.A., Stevens, R.J., & Slavin, R.E. (1986). Reading instruction in the mainstream: A cooperative learning approach (Tech. Rep. No. 5). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Research on Elementary and Middle Schools.
12.
Palincsar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and comprehension monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 117-175.
13.
Paris, S.Cross, D., & Lipson, M. (1984). Informal strategies for learning: A program to improve children's reading awareness and comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1239-1252.
14.
Paris, S.Lipson, M., & Wixson, K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293-316.
15.
Perfetti, C. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
Rosenshine, B. & Stevens, R.J. (1986). Teaching functions. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
17.
Samuels, S.J. (1981). Some essentials of decoding. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 2, 11-25.
18.
Sharan, S. (1980). Cooperative learning in small groups: Recent methods and effects on achievement, attitudes and ethnic relations. Review of Educational Research, 50, 241-249.
19.
Short, E. & Ryan, E. (1982). Remediating poor readers' comprehension failurts with a story grammar strategy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
20.
Slavin, R.E. (1983a). Cooperative learning. New York: Longman.
21.
Slavin, R.E. (1983b). When does cooperative learning increase student achievement?Psychological Bulletin, 94, 429-445.
22.
Slavin, R.E. (1984a). Team Assisted Individualization: Cooperative learning and individualized instruction in the mainstreamed classroom. Remedial and Special Education, 5(6), 33-42.
23.
Slavin, R.E. (1984b). Component building: A strategy for research-based instructional improvement. Elementary School Journal, 84, 255-269.
24.
Slavin, R.E. (1985a). Cooperative learning: Applying contact theory in desegregated schools. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 45-62.
25.
Slavin, R.E. (1985b). Team Assisted Individualization: Combining cooperative learning and individualized instruction in mathematics. In R.E. Slavin, S. Sharan., S. Kagan., R. Hertz-Lazarowitz, C. Webb., & R. Schmuc (Eds.), Learning to cooperating, to learn (pp. 177-209). New York: Plenum.
26.
Slavin, R.E. (in press-a). Cooperative learning: Where behavioral and humanistic approaches to classroom motivation meet. Elementary School Journal.
27.
Slavin, R.E. (in press-b). Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A best evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research.
28.
Slavin, R.E., & Karweit, N.L. (1981). Cognitive and affective outcomes of an intensive student team learning experience. Journal of Experimental Education, 50, 29-35.
29.
Slavin, R.E., Leavey, M., & Madden, N.A. (1984). Combining cooperative learning and individualized instruction: Effects on student mathematics achievement, attitudes, and behaviors. Elementary School Journal, 84, 409-422.
30.
Slavin, R.E., Madden, N.A., & Leavey, M. (1984). Effects of team assisted individualization on the mathematics achievement of academically handicapped and nonhandicapped students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 813-819.
31.
Stevens, R.J. (in press). The effects of strategy training on the identification of the main idea of expository passages. Journal of Educational Psychology.
32.
Stevens, R.J., Madden, N.A., Slavin, R.E., & Farnish, A.M. (in press). Cooperative integrated reading and composition: Two field experiments. Reading Research Quarterly.
33.
Stevens, R.J., Slavin, R.E., Farnish, A.M., & Madden, N.A. (1987). Effects of cooperative learning and direct instruction in reading comprehension strategies on main idea and inference skills. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Research on Elementary and Middle Schools.
34.
Thurlow, M.Graden, J., Ysseldyke, J., & Algozzine, R. (1984). Student reading during reading class: The lost activity in reading instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 77, 267-272.
