Reading comprehension is conceptualized as a problem-solving activity in which the reader constructs meaning for the text while simultaneously reconstructing prior conceptions. Comprehension instruction is conceptualized as teaching students the thinking skills that foster interactions with the text. A specific instructional technique, reciprocal teaching, which is conducted as a group problemsolving activity in which the students practice the use of four strategies to promote thinking while reading, is described and illustrated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alvermann, D.E., Smith, L.C., & Readance, J.E. (1985). Prior knowledge activation and the comprehension of compatible and incompatible text. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(4), 420-436.
2.
Anderson, L. (1985). What are students doing when they do all that seatwork? In C. Fisher & D. Berliner (Eds.), Perspectives on instructional time (pp. 189-202). New York: Longman.
3.
Bartlett, E.J. (1979). Curriculum, concepts of literacy, and social class. In L. B. Resnick & P. A. Weaver, (Eds.), Theory and practice of early reading (Vol. 2, pp. 229-242). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
Bereiter, C. & Bird, M. (1985). Identification and teaching of reading strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 2(2), 131-156.
5.
Binet, A. (1909). Les idees modernes sur les enfants. Paris: Ernest Flammarion.
6.
Brown, A.L. (1985). Mental orthopedics: A conversation with Alfred Binet. In S. Chipman, J. Segal., & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Research and open questions (Vol. 2, pp. 319-337). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
Brown, A.L., Campione, J.C., & Day, J.D. (1981). Learning to learn: On training students to learn from texts. Educational Researcher, 10, 14-21.
8.
Brown, A.L. & Palincsar, A.S. (1982). Inducing strategic learning from text by means of informed, self-control training. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 2(1), 1-17.
9.
Brown, A.L., & Palincsar, A.S. (in press). Guided cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), Cognition and instruction: Issues and agenda. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
Brown, A.L., Palincsar, A.S., & Purcell, L. (1986). Poor readers: Teach, don't label. In U. Neisser (Ed.), The academic performance of minority children: A new perspective (pp. 105-143). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11.
Brown, A.L., & Reeves, R. (in press). Bandwidths of competence: The role of supportive contexts in learning and development. In L.S. Lieben & D.H. Feldman (Eds.), Development and learning: Conflict or congruence? Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
Bruner, J. (1978). The role of dialogue in language acquisition. In A. Sinclair, R. J. Jarvella, & J. M. Levelt, (Eds.), The child's conception of language (pp. 241-256). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
13.
Chipman, S.Segal, J., & Glaser, R. (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Research and open questions. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14.
Commission on Reading of the National Academy of Education. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers. Springfield, IL: Philips Bros.
15.
Corno, L. & Mandinach, E. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18, 88-108.
16.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think (2nd ed.). Boston: Heath. (Original work published 1910).
17.
Eaton, J.J., Anderson, C.A., & Smith, E.L. (1984). Students' misconceptions interfere with science learnsing: Case studies of fifth-grade students. Elementary School Journal, 84(4), 366-379.
18.
Feuerstein, R. (1980). Instrumental enrichment: An intervention program for cognitive modifiability. Baltimore: University Park Press.
19.
Levin, J. & Pressley, M. (1981). Improving children's prose comprehension: Selected strategies that seem to succeed. In C.M. Santa & B.L. Hayes (Eds.), Children's prose comprehension: Research and practice (pp. 44-71). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
20.
Michigan State Board of Education. (1987, August). The position of the Michigan State Board of Education regarding thinking skills.
21.
Nickerson, R.S., Perkins, D.N., & Smith, E.E. (1985). The teaching of thinking. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22.
Palincsar, A.S. (1986). The role of dialogue in providing scaffolded instruction. Educational Psychologist, 21(1 & 2), 73-98.
23.
Palincsar, A.S. (1987, April). Collaborating for collaborative learning from text. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
24.
Palincsar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (1984). The reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.
25.
Palincsar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (1986). Interactive teaching to promote independent learning from text. The Reading Teacher, 39(8), 771-777.
26.
Palincsar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (in press). Advances in the cognitive instruction of handicapped students. In M. C. Wang, H. J. Walberg, & M. Reynolds (Eds.), The handbook of special education: Research and practice. New York: Pergamon Press.
27.
Paris, S.G., & Meyers, M. (1981). Comprehension monitoring, memory, and study strategies of good and poor readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 8, 5-22.
28.
Paris, S.G., & Oka, E. (1986). Self-regulated learning among exceptional children. Exceptional Children, 53(2), 103-108.
29.
Pearson, P.D., Hansen, J., & Gordon, C. (1979). The effect of background knowledge on young children's comprehension of explicit and implicit information. Journal of Reading Behavior, 11, 201-210.
Piaget, J. (1967). Biologie et connaissance. Paris: Gallimard.
32.
Samuels, S.J. (1983). Diagnosing reading problems. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 2(4), 1-11.
33.
Slavin, R.E. (1983). Cooperative learning. New York: Longman.
34.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner., & E. Souberman., Eds.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
Wood, D.Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.
