A Metacognitive Approach to Phonics

Abstract

For poor readers, one roadblock to the construction of meaning from text may be the inability to decode words quickly and accurately. In most cases more phonics instruction, similar to what has not worked in the past, does not improve this situation. Based on an analysis of the research literature in decoding and linguistics and a 4-year cycle of program development, a new program was created for teaching decoding to poor readers of average or above intelligence in grades 1 through 8. The program guides students to become aware of patterns and consistencies in our language and to apply a decoding process of using what they have learned about words to decode words they do not know. It is a teacher directed, supplemental program to be taught to a whole class for approximately 15 to 20 minutes a day and is intended to be used in conjunction with a basal reader or trade book program. The program features a multisensory approach, strong emphasis on vocabulary and language development, and a direct teaching model. Goals of the program include teaching students to use known words to decode unknown words, to discriminate structural components of words, to see how our language is organized, to be flexible in pronouncing words, and to demonstrate automaticity in decoding---all as foundation blocks for the meaning-making process. Preliminary evidence suggests that the program has been successful in improving students' decoding skills.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson, R.C. , Hiebert, E.H. , Scott, J.A. , & Wilkinson, I.A.G. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the commission on reading. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Baker, L. & Brown, A.L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 453-494). New York: Longman.

Barr, R. & Drecben, R. (1983). How schools work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bradley, L. & Bryant, P.E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read---A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419-421.

Calfee, R. & Drum, P. (1986). Research on teaching reading. In M. W. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 804-849). New York: Macmillan.

Cunningham, P.M. (1975-76). Investigating a synthesized theory of mediated word identification. Reading Research Quarterly, 11, 127-143.

Cunningham, P.M. , Moore, S.A. , Cunningham, J.W. , & Moore, D.W. (1983). Reading in elementary classrooms. New York: Longman.

Durost, W.N. , Bixler, H.H. , Wrightstone, J.W. , Prescott, G.A. , & Balow, I.H. (1970). Metropolitan achievement tests, word knowledge. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Javanovich.

Fowler, C. Napps, S. , & Feldman, L. (1985). Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming. Memory and Cognition, 13, 241-255.

10.

Fry, E.B. , Foutoukidis, D.L. , & Polk, J.K. (1985). The new reading teacher's book of lists. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

11.

Gaskins, I.W. (1984). There's more to a reading problem than poor reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 467-471.

12.

Gaskins, I.W. , Downer, M.A. , & Gaskins, R.W. (1986). Introduction to the Benchmark School word identification/vocabulary development program. Media, PA: Benchmark Press.

13.

Gibson, E.J. , & Levin, H. (1975). The psychology of reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

14.

Gleitman, L.R. (1985). Orthographic resources affect reading acquisition---If they are used. Remedial and Special Education, 6, 24-36.

15.

Glushko, R.J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 674-691.

16.

Gough, P.B. (1983). Context, form, and interaction. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements in reading (pp. 203-211). New York: Academic Press.

17.

Jastak, S. & Wilkinson, G.S. (1984). The wide range achievement test---Revised. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.

18.

Johnson, D.D. , & Baumann, J.F. (1984). Word identification. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 583-608). New York: Longman.

19.

LaBerge, D. & Samuels, S.J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.

20.

Marsh, G. Densberg, P. , & Cooper, J. (1977). Developmental changes in reading strategies. Journal of Reading Behavior, 9, 391-394.

21.

Mason, J.M. , & Au, K.H. (1986). Reading instruction for today. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

22.

McClelland, J.L. , & Johnston, J.C. (1977). The role of familiar units in the perception of words and nonwords. Perception and Psychophysics, 22, 249-261.

23.

Perfetti, C.A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.

24.

Perfetti, C.A. (1986). Continuities in reading acquisition, reading skill, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 11-21.

25.

Prescott, G.A. , Balow, I.H. , Hogan, T.P. , & Farr, R.C. (1978). Metropolitan achievement tests, reading survey test. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.

26.

Shulman, L.S. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 3-36). New York: Macmillan.

27.

Stanovich, K.E. (1984). The interactive-compensatory model of reading: A confluence of developmental, experimental, and educational psychology. Remedial and Special Education, 5, 11-19.

28.

Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Matthew effect in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-406.

29.

Torgesen, J.K. (1985). Memory processes in reading disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, 350-357.

30.

Vellutino, F.R. , & Scanlon, D.M. (1984). Converging perspectives in the study of the reading process: Reactions to the papers presented by Morrison, Siegel and Ryan, and Stanovich. Remedial and Special Education, 5, 39-44.

31.

Wolff, D.E. , Densberg, P. , & Marsh, G. (1985). Analogy strategies for improving word recognition in competent and learning disabled readers. The Reading Teacher, 38, 412-416.

32.

Zinna, D.R. , Liberman, I.Y. , & Shankweiler, D. (1986). Children's sensitivity to factors influencing vowel reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 465-480.

33.

Zivian, M.T. , & Samuels, M.T. (1986). Performance on a wordlikeness task by normal readers and reading-disabled children. Reading Reserach Quarterly, 21, 150-160.